public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/103771] [12 Regression] Missed vectorization under -mavx512f -mavx512vl after r12-5489
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2022 05:21:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-103771-4-7wsTcDpdwW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-103771-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103771

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #33 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Oh yes I remember why factor_out_conditional_conversion is not doing it. it is
because we have two bb but the current code does not handle that case.
That is we have:
  if (x.1_1 > 255)
    goto <bb 3>; [INV]
  else
    goto <bb 4>; [INV]

  <bb 3> :
  _2 = -x_5(D);
  _3 = _2 >> 31;
  iftmp.0_7 = (uint8_t) _3;
  goto <bb 5>; [INV]

  <bb 4> :
  iftmp.0_6 = (uint8_t) x_5(D);

  <bb 5> :
  # iftmp.0_4 = PHI <iftmp.0_7(3), iftmp.0_6(4)>

While the correct code only handles the case where the one of the bb4 does not
exist. Yes I am working on this for GCC 13.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-02-01  5:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-12-20  8:59 [Bug target/103771] New: " wwwhhhyyy333 at gmail dot com
2021-12-20 11:45 ` [Bug target/103771] [12 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-04 15:31 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-05  9:00 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-13  8:43 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-13  9:02 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-13  9:04 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-13  9:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-13  9:50 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-13 10:04 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-13 10:11 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-13 10:22 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-13 10:43 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-13 10:44 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2022-01-13 10:49 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2022-01-13 10:50 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-13 12:40 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-13 13:42 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2022-01-13 14:42 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-14  9:40 ` rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-14 10:18 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-17  8:22 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-18  8:31 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-18  8:36 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-18 10:44 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2022-01-18 10:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-19  6:03 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-19  6:10 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-19  6:25 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-19  7:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-19  8:33 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-01-19  8:48 ` rguenther at suse dot de
2022-01-20  8:52 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-01-27  6:03 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-02-01  5:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-02-01 16:13 ` law at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-01 16:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-13  9:58 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-14  7:36 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-14  7:45 ` crazylht at gmail dot com
2022-02-14  7:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-02-17 11:01 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-04-26  6:55 ` [Bug target/103771] [12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-06 23:21 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-08  7:38 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-05-08  7:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-103771-4-7wsTcDpdwW@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).