* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2010-12-09 14:45 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-09 15:26 ` tstdenis at elliptictech dot com
` (35 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-09 14:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |gcc-bugs at nospam dot
| |pz.podzone.net
--- Comment #42 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-09 14:45:18 UTC ---
*** Bug 46853 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-12-09 14:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP) manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-12-09 15:26 ` tstdenis at elliptictech dot com
2010-12-09 16:07 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (34 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: tstdenis at elliptictech dot com @ 2010-12-09 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
--- Comment #43 from Tom St Denis <tstdenis at elliptictech dot com> 2010-12-09 15:25:25 UTC ---
Maybe it's high time someone address this shortcoming as opposed to adding
additional language front ends. If you can't even get the core ones right...
Just saying...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-12-09 14:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP) manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-09 15:26 ` tstdenis at elliptictech dot com
@ 2010-12-09 16:07 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-09 16:35 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
` (33 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-09 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
--- Comment #44 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-09 16:06:28 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #43)
> Maybe it's high time someone address this shortcoming as opposed to adding
> additional language front ends. If you can't even get the core ones right...
Generally the people who add front-ends aren't the people working on the
middle-end and optimisers, so work on one doesn't take resources away from the
other.
Feel free to pay someone to fix it if this is important to you. Just sayin'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-12-09 16:07 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-12-09 16:35 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-09 17:04 ` tstdenis at elliptictech dot com
` (32 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-09 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
--- Comment #45 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-09 16:34:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #44)
> (In reply to comment #43)
> > Maybe it's high time someone address this shortcoming as opposed to adding
> > additional language front ends. If you can't even get the core ones right...
>
> Generally the people who add front-ends aren't the people working on the
> middle-end and optimisers, so work on one doesn't take resources away from the
> other.
>
Moreover, the people that add new FEs are not the same people working on the
C/C++ FEs.
Anyway, in the comments above you can find the reasons why this is difficult,
how Clang has solved it (or so they say, I haven't seen a comparison over many
different testcases), and why you should not expect a fix in the medium term.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-12-09 16:35 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-12-09 17:04 ` tstdenis at elliptictech dot com
2010-12-09 18:09 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
` (31 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: tstdenis at elliptictech dot com @ 2010-12-09 17:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
--- Comment #46 from Tom St Denis <tstdenis at elliptictech dot com> 2010-12-09 17:03:37 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #44)
> (In reply to comment #43)
> > Maybe it's high time someone address this shortcoming as opposed to adding
> > additional language front ends. If you can't even get the core ones right...
>
> Generally the people who add front-ends aren't the people working on the
> middle-end and optimisers, so work on one doesn't take resources away from the
> other.
It still adds work to the project as a whole and serves as a distraction for
new people who have the time to contribute.
> Feel free to pay someone to fix it if this is important to you. Just sayin'
If fixing known bugs is not a priority then of what value is this project other
than being free? I thought the whole point was to also be correct. Granted
this isn't a show-stopper as far as bugs go, but the laissez-faire "if you hate
it fix it yourself" trend in OSS is really annoying.
When I ran my own OSS projects I never told the users "nyah nyah fix it
yourself!" When I ran out of time to work on the OSS projects I gave them up,
but so long as I called myself a maintainer I addressed issues as best as I
could.
I'd almost rather they leave it as WONTFIX then just leaving it open. I'd also
be happier if they documented this class of SSA fail in the man page so people
don't walk into it [as I and others have].
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-12-09 17:04 ` tstdenis at elliptictech dot com
@ 2010-12-09 18:09 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-10 0:09 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
` (30 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-09 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
--- Comment #47 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-09 18:06:05 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #46)
> It still adds work to the project as a whole and serves as a distraction for
> new people who have the time to contribute.
>
The same could be said of any feature or bugfix. It depends on your priorities
and viewpoint. In fact, the way GCC development works, making a new feature
work (like a new FE) may provide the motivation for someone to fix an old bug.
> I'd almost rather they leave it as WONTFIX then just leaving it open.
How is that a solution? People will keep reporting it. As said above, it took
more than 8 years to solve some bugs, but someone came around and fixed them.
There are much older bugs than this one that may get fixed in the next couple
of releases.
WONTFIX means GCC devs don't want a fix. This is not the case here. There are
even ideas above about how to fix this. It is just that there is no enough
motivation for anyone to deal with the probably huge amount of work it
requires.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-12-09 18:09 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-12-10 0:09 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-12-10 1:25 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
` (29 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: hp at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-10 0:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
--- Comment #48 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-10 00:08:40 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #47)
> WONTFIX means GCC devs don't want a fix.
Not quite, and saying it that way, sends the wrong message. It's more like
"are not going to put resources (of their own) into fixing it".
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2010-12-10 0:09 ` hp at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2010-12-10 1:25 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-06 20:40 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
` (28 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: redi at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2010-12-10 1:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
--- Comment #49 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2010-12-10 01:24:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #46)
>
> If fixing known bugs is not a priority then of what value is this project other
> than being free? I thought the whole point was to also be correct. Granted
> this isn't a show-stopper as far as bugs go, but the laissez-faire "if you hate
> it fix it yourself" trend in OSS is really annoying.
So is the trend of users who leave snarky "just saying" comments claiming
things "can't be done right." GCC is not a static analysis tool, it will never
be as good at some things as some other tools - that doesn't make it useless or
incorrect. Imperfect, yes, and noone disputes that.
Fixing bugs is a priority, just look on the mailing lists to see how many are
fixed. Search for Manu's comments to see how hard he works (in his own time)
trying to fix longstanding bugs such as this, or at least try to improve the
situation slightly, or just identify duplicate reports.
But not all bugs are equal. To generalise from the fact that one particularly
difficult bug hasn't been fixed to claim that fixing known bugs is not a
priority, and to question the value of the entire project, just makes you sound
ridiculous.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2010-12-10 1:25 ` redi at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-06 20:40 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-02-06 21:32 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
` (27 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-06 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |zackw at panix dot com
--- Comment #50 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-06 20:25:13 UTC ---
*** Bug 47623 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-06 20:40 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-02-06 21:32 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-27 12:49 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (26 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-02-06 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
--- Comment #51 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-02-06 20:48:38 UTC ---
BTW, anyone interested in fixing this may want to take a look at the newest
proposal for improving Wuninitialized in Clang:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-dev/2011-February/013170.html
They specifically mention the issues of GCC's implementation and how they plan
to address them. Nevertheless, there are several problems for implementing
Clang's approach in GCC. First, they prefer to have false positives (a false
warning) than false negatives (a missed correct warning), whereas GCC tries as
hard as possible to not warn when it shouldn't. Second, their proposal makes
use of the static analysis checker build into clang, which GCC does not have
(and probably never will) in its front-ends.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2011-02-06 21:32 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-06-27 12:49 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-06-27 16:38 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " manu at gcc dot gnu.org
` (25 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-06-27 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.6 |4.4.7
--- Comment #52 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-27 12:12:29 UTC ---
4.3 branch is being closed, moving to 4.4.7 target.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2011-06-27 12:49 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-06-27 16:38 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2011-08-04 8:44 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
` (24 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-06-27 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
--- Comment #53 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-27 13:06:09 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #52)
> 4.3 branch is being closed, moving to 4.4.7 target.
Richard, I would suggest to remove the regression markers. This is a regression
since 4.0 that it is unlikely to be fixed in the near future. Hence, not really
worth to track as a regression. One less bug to handle by the release managers.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2011-06-27 16:38 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2011-08-04 8:44 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-13 13:18 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (23 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-08-04 8:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cernekee at gmail dot com
--- Comment #54 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-04 08:41:02 UTC ---
*** Bug 49971 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2011-08-04 8:44 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-03-13 13:18 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-02 13:02 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.6/4.7/4.8 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (22 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-03-13 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.4.7 |4.5.4
--- Comment #55 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-13 12:45:16 UTC ---
4.4 branch is being closed, moving to 4.5.4 target.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2012-03-13 13:18 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-07-02 13:02 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-24 22:06 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
` (21 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-07-02 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.5.4 |4.6.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2012-07-02 13:02 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.6/4.7/4.8 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-10-24 22:06 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-24 22:17 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
` (20 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-10-24 22:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |yellow at rg3 dot name
--- Comment #56 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-10-24 22:05:41 UTC ---
*** Bug 48414 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-24 22:06 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-10-24 22:17 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-24 23:52 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
` (19 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-10-24 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
--- Comment #57 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-10-24 22:16:09 UTC ---
BTW, Clang has decided to implement this in the FE for simple cases.
Quoting: http://clang.llvm.org/docs/ReleaseNotes.html
-Wuninitialized has been taught to recognise uninitialized uses which always
occur when an explicitly-written non-constant condition is either true or
false. For example:
int f(bool b) {
int n;
if (b)
n = 1;
return n;
}
sometimes-uninit.cpp:3:7: warning: variable 'n' is used uninitialized whenever
'if' condition is false [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
if (b)
^
sometimes-uninit.cpp:5:10: note: uninitialized use occurs here
return n;
^
sometimes-uninit.cpp:3:3: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true
if (b)
^~~~~~
sometimes-uninit.cpp:2:8: note: initialize the variable 'n' to silence this
warning
int n;
^
= 0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-24 22:17 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-10-24 23:52 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-10-24 23:58 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
` (18 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-10-24 23:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |william@witt-family.net
--- Comment #58 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-10-24 23:52:08 UTC ---
*** Bug 46684 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-24 23:52 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-10-24 23:58 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-12 15:15 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.7/4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-10-24 23:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |eggert at gnu dot org
--- Comment #59 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-10-24 23:57:21 UTC ---
*** Bug 48643 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2012-10-24 23:58 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-04-12 15:15 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-15 18:47 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
` (16 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-04-12 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.6.4 |4.7.4
--- Comment #60 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-12 15:15:48 UTC ---
GCC 4.6.4 has been released and the branch has been closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2013-04-12 15:15 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.7/4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-04-15 18:47 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-02-16 13:12 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
` (15 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-04-15 18:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ppluzhnikov at google dot
| |com
--- Comment #61 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-15 18:46:59 UTC ---
*** Bug 56972 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-420350-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Apr 15 18:47:03 2013
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-420350-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10577 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2013 18:47:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10381 invoked by uid 48); 15 Apr 2013 18:47:00 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/56972] Missing "may be used uninitialized" warning for "obvious" uninitialized
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 18:47:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Status CC Resolution
Message-ID: <bug-56972-4-vrFwdk4oOD@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-56972-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-56972-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg01495.txt.bz2
Content-length: 837
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56972
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution| |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-15 18:46:59 UTC ---
Infamous PR18501. With:
~/test1/197214/build/gcc/cc1 -Wall -Wextra -O1 pr56972.c -fdump-tree-all-lineno
you can see that pr56972.c.020t.copyrename1 contains the uninit use but
pr56972.c.021t.ccp1 has removed it.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 18501 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-420352-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Apr 15 19:37:33 2013
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-420352-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2993 invoked by alias); 15 Apr 2013 19:37:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 2929 invoked by uid 48); 15 Apr 2013 19:37:29 -0000
From: "pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/56921] [4.9 Regression] ICE in rtx_cost called by doloop_optimize_loops for PPC
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 19:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-56921-4-1WkjFTMhiK@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-56921-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-56921-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg01497.txt.bz2
Content-length: 708
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idV921
--- Comment #13 from Pat Haugen <pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-15 19:37:27 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> (In reply to comment #11)
> > Created attachment 29877 [details]
> > patch papering over the issue with TODO_do_not_ggc_collect
> >
> > Patch papering over (restoring non-GC collect) attached. Not exactly the
> > best solution as garbage is then again not collected during the in some
> > cases memory expensive passes.
>
> Fixes ICE while building libgfortran for arm-*-*.
> Also, no regressions on arm-none-eabi tested with qemu.
This also fixes the testsuite failures and numerous spec build failures on
powerpc.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2013-04-15 18:47 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-02-16 13:12 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
2014-03-13 18:00 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com @ 2014-02-16 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Jackie Rosen <jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
--- Comment #69 from Jackie Rosen <jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com> ---
*** Bug 260998 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Seen from the domain http://volichat.com
Page where seen: http://volichat.com/adult-chat-rooms
Marked for reference. Resolved as fixed @bugzilla.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2014-02-16 13:12 ` jackie.rosen at hushmail dot com
@ 2014-03-13 18:00 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-03-13 18:03 ` tstdenis at elliptictech dot com
` (13 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-03-13 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |chengniansun at gmail dot com
--- Comment #70 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 60444 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-446211-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Mar 13 18:00:03 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-446211-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5755 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2014 18:00:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 5577 invoked by uid 48); 13 Mar 2014 17:59:59 -0000
From: "manu at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/60444] No -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:00:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: manu at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status cc resolution
Message-ID: <bug-60444-4-F1n2Nje0EV@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-60444-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-60444-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg01080.txt.bz2
Content-length: 616
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60444
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |manu at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Infamous bug 18501.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 18501 ***
>From gcc-bugs-return-446213-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Thu Mar 13 18:02:25 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-446213-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10734 invoked by alias); 13 Mar 2014 18:02:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10694 invoked by uid 55); 13 Mar 2014 18:02:21 -0000
From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/57320] [4.9 Regression] Shrink-wrapping leaves unreachable blocks in the CFG
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 18:02:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: rtl-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 4.9.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-57320-4-xTKy1LGGAk@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-57320-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-57320-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg01082.txt.bz2
Content-length: 466
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?idW320
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Mar 13 18:01:48 2014
New Revision: 208551
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev 8551&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/57320
* function.c (rest_of_handle_thread_prologue_and_epilogue): Cleanup
the CFG after thread_prologue_and_epilogue_insns.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/function.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2014-03-13 18:00 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-03-13 18:03 ` tstdenis at elliptictech dot com
2014-06-12 13:42 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: tstdenis at elliptictech dot com @ 2014-03-13 18:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
--- Comment #71 from Tom St Denis <tstdenis at elliptictech dot com> ---
Hey guys, this year will be the 10 year anniversary of this bug. We should
order cake!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
2014-03-13 18:03 ` tstdenis at elliptictech dot com
@ 2014-06-12 13:42 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-19 13:35 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.8/4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-12 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #72 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The 4.7 branch is being closed, moving target milestone to 4.8.4.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-12 13:42 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-19 13:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-23 8:16 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.8/4.9/5/6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-19 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.8.4 |4.8.5
--- Comment #73 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.8.4 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (25 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-19 13:35 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.8/4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-23 8:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:04 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-23 8:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.8.5 |4.9.3
--- Comment #74 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The gcc-4_8-branch is being closed, re-targeting regressions to 4.9.3.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-23 8:16 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.8/4.9/5/6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-26 20:04 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-26 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
--- Comment #75 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (27 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-26 20:04 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-26 20:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-07-29 15:58 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [8/9/10/11 " manu at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-26 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.9.3 |4.9.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (28 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-26 20:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-07-29 15:58 ` manu at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-07 23:41 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: manu at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-07-29 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |felix at piedallu dot me
--- Comment #94 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 96368 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (29 preceding siblings ...)
2020-07-29 15:58 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [8/9/10/11 " manu at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-07 23:41 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-04-15 23:05 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-07 23:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Known to fail| |10.2.0, 11.0, 4.7.0, 4.8.4,
| |4.9.4, 5.5.0, 6.4.0, 7.2.0,
| |8.3.0, 9.1.0
Last reconfirmed|2018-11-03 00:00:00 |2021-4-7
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 |
--- Comment #95 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Reconfirmed with GCC 11.
I wonder if running CCP first, just before the early uninit pass, but only to
propagate constants and without modifying the CFG, and then the "late"
uninitialized pass to look for uninitialized operands in the PHIs while
evaluating the predicates using the CCP lattice values, would be a way to get
back the warnings without introducing false positives.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [8/9/10/11 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (30 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-07 23:41 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-04-15 23:05 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14 9:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: msebor at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-04-15 23:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
--- Comment #96 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
*** Bug 89202 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (31 preceding siblings ...)
2021-04-15 23:05 ` msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-05-14 9:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-14 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|8.5 |9.4
--- Comment #97 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 8 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (32 preceding siblings ...)
2021-05-14 9:45 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-01 8:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:33 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-01 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5
--- Comment #98 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (33 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-01 8:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-27 9:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:28 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4
--- Comment #99 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (34 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-27 9:33 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:28 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5
--- Comment #100 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread* [Bug tree-optimization/18501] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Missing 'used uninitialized' warning (CCP)
[not found] <bug-18501-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (35 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-28 10:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-07 10:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
36 siblings, 0 replies; 37+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18501
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.5 |11.5
--- Comment #101 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 37+ messages in thread