* [Bug fortran/91862] [9/10 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2394
[not found] <bug-91862-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2020-03-12 11:58 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-26 20:44 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-03-12 11:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91862
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.3 |9.4
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.3.0 has been released, adjusting target milestone.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/91862] [9/10 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2394
[not found] <bug-91862-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-12 11:58 ` [Bug fortran/91862] [9/10 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2394 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2020-04-26 20:44 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-26 21:35 ` [Bug fortran/91862] [9/10/11 " anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2020-04-26 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91862
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Replacing
character(3) :: a(3) = 'abc'
by
character(3), parameter :: a(3) = 'abc' ! No ICE
also avoids the ICE.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/91862] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2394
[not found] <bug-91862-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-03-12 11:58 ` [Bug fortran/91862] [9/10 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2394 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-04-26 20:44 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-01-26 21:35 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29 11:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-26 21:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91862
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
With r11-6917, I do not get any failures for the testcases in this PR.
Actually, z1.f90 works with 7.5.0, 8.4.1, 9.3.1, 10.2.1, and master.
z2.f90 works with 9.3.1, 10.2.1, and master.
It fails for 8.4.1 and 7.5.0: no ICE, but wrong output.
Does anybody know when this was fixed? Close the PR, add a testcase?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/91862] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2394
[not found] <bug-91862-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-01-26 21:35 ` [Bug fortran/91862] [9/10/11 " anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-01-29 11:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-01-29 12:39 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-29 11:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91862
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #5)
> With r11-6917, I do not get any failures for the testcases in this PR.
[...]
> z2.f90 works with 9.3.1, 10.2.1, and master.
> Does anybody know when this was fixed? Close the PR, add a testcase?
It fails here with gcc-9 (of Ubuntu) which was updated on 08 Aug 2020. Only
glancing at the GCC 9 log files:
I think the patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9db58db5b3986531475968dd383f13a3f925d7ae for PR 96100 and
PR 96101 fixes the issue, but I did not do any regression testing.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/91862] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2394
[not found] <bug-91862-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-01-29 11:29 ` burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-01-29 12:39 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-02 13:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-02 14:06 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-01-29 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91862
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |REOPENED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #6)
> (In reply to anlauf from comment #5)
> > With r11-6917, I do not get any failures for the testcases in this PR.
> [...]
> > z2.f90 works with 9.3.1, 10.2.1, and master.
>
> > Does anybody know when this was fixed? Close the PR, add a testcase?
>
> It fails here with gcc-9 (of Ubuntu) which was updated on 08 Aug 2020. Only
> glancing at the GCC 9 log files:
>
> I think the patch
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9db58db5b3986531475968dd383f13a3f925d7ae for PR 96100
> and PR 96101 fixes the issue, but I did not do any regression testing.
The patch for PRs 96100/101 was backported to 9-branch on 28th December.
Both testcases run fine with 9-branch now. They even give the intended result
:-)
Before closing, I will add a testcase to master. I have taken the PR and
reopened it.
Cheers
Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/91862] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2394
[not found] <bug-91862-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-01-29 12:39 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-02-02 13:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-02-02 14:06 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-02 13:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91862
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:831ff94a882149616b17132d23478c9d1fcbdcd6
commit r11-7041-g831ff94a882149616b17132d23478c9d1fcbdcd6
Author: Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
Date: Tue Feb 2 13:55:50 2021 +0000
Fortran: Check remains fixed by patch for PRs 96100/101 [PR91862].
2021-02-02 Paul Thomas <pault@gcc.gnu.org>
gcc/testsuite
PR fortran/91862
* gfortran.dg/pr91862.f90: New test.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/91862] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2394
[not found] <bug-91862-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2021-02-02 13:55 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-02-02 14:06 ` pault at gcc dot gnu.org
6 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pault at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-02-02 14:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91862
Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas <pault at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Closed. Thanks for the report Gerhard!
Paul
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread