public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug fortran/93483] ICE in gfc_constructor_copy, at fortran/constructor.c:103
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 19:24:21 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-93483-4-BuhsJqmuR1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-93483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93483
--- Comment #21 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #17)
> Like this for the first part of the test from the patch:
>
> diff --git a/gcc/fortran/arith.cc b/gcc/fortran/arith.cc
> index 9e079e42995..5e96bb9658e 100644
> --- a/gcc/fortran/arith.cc
> +++ b/gcc/fortran/arith.cc
> @@ -1267,6 +1267,9 @@ reduce_unary (arith (*eval) (gfc_expr *, gfc_expr **),
> gfc_expr *op,
> if (op->expr_type == EXPR_CONSTANT)
> return eval (op, result);
>
> + if (op->expr_type != EXPR_ARRAY)
> + return ARITH_INVALID_TYPE;
> +
> rc = ARITH_OK;
> head = gfc_constructor_copy (op->value.constructor);
> for (c = gfc_constructor_first (head); c; c = gfc_constructor_next (c))
>
>
Yeah, I was getting just rather close to this one...
This is probably the right way to go.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-14 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-93483-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2020-12-06 22:13 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2020-12-07 21:52 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-11 16:59 ` gscfq@t-online.de
2022-10-12 19:46 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-13 16:35 ` kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-13 18:43 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-13 18:52 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2022-10-13 19:09 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-13 19:26 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2022-10-13 19:35 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-13 19:55 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-13 20:02 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2022-10-13 20:29 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-13 20:56 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-13 21:39 ` sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu
2022-10-14 19:06 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-14 19:13 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-14 19:14 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-14 19:19 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-14 19:24 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2022-10-14 20:14 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-14 21:21 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-15 9:28 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-15 13:55 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-15 13:56 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-15 17:38 ` mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-15 19:56 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-17 17:26 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-10-17 17:39 ` anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-93483-4-BuhsJqmuR1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).