From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>
To: Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>
Cc: Reshabh K Sharma <reshabh@cs.washington.edu>, gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Describe instructions with same reg in def and use or mutiple defs and attach write latency
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 12:21:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220128182105.GF614@gate.crashing.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b7e6310-1376-91a0-fe50-a6b7e5dd125b@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 10:39:54AM -0700, Jeff Law via Gcc-help wrote:
> On 1/26/2022 6:20 PM, Reshabh K Sharma via Gcc-help wrote:
> >I am trying to implement a post address update load instruction in our
> >downstream riscv backend. I want to attach write latency information to a
> >use register. For example, rd = new_load rs1 rs2, I want to attach separate
> >write latency information to both rd and rs1.
> >
> >I am unable to find how to describe instructions that have an operand as
> >both def and use, and later attach write latency information for the
> >instruction scheduler to work properly.
> >
> >It will also be very helpful if you can point me to the implementation of
> >similar instructions in other backends, for example, LBZU in PowerPC, ARM's
> >LWD post/pre address update versions and ARM's neon simd load with update.
> I'm not sure the scheduler can model different latencies for the
> multiple outputs. If anyone knows for sure, it would be Vlad.
You can use TARGET_SCHED_ADJUST_COST?
> It may not matter in practice though. I'd hazard a guess these things
> hang out in the reorder buffer until both outputs are ready and only
> then will it move into the retirement queue.
The GCC scheduling description says when results are ready, not when the
instructions (can) finish or complete (aka retire). I do agree this
case doesn't matter so much, cases where it does matter will have their
dependency chains broken much earlier :-)
Segher
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-28 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-27 1:20 Reshabh K Sharma
2022-01-28 17:39 ` Jeff Law
2022-01-28 18:21 ` Segher Boessenkool [this message]
2022-02-04 1:06 ` Reshabh K Sharma
2022-02-04 1:31 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-02-16 19:41 ` Reshabh K Sharma
2022-02-17 18:48 ` Segher Boessenkool
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220128182105.GF614@gate.crashing.org \
--to=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=reshabh@cs.washington.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).