From: "Roger Sayle" <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
To: "'Uros Bizjak'" <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Cc: <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: RE: [x86 PATCH] PR target/31985: Improve memory operand use with doubleword add.
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 23:04:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <006701d99fd5$63e988c0$2bbc9a40$@nextmovesoftware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFULd4bpz5rqiHf-r5MG_=P=AmkNe5L+Dg0ZaBTa2OF8m7ZgpA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1252 bytes --]
Hi Uros,
> On the 7th June 2023, Uros Bizkak wrote:
> The register allocator considers the instruction-to-be-split as one instruction, so it
> can allocate output register to match an input register (or a register that forms an
> input address), So, you have to either add an early clobber to the output, or
> somehow prevent output to clobber registers in the second pattern.
This implements your suggestion of adding an early clobber to the output, a
one character ('&') change from the previous version of this patch. Retested
with make bootstrap and make -k check, with and without -m32, to confirm
there are no issues, and this still fixes the pr31985.c test case.
As you've suggested, I'm also working on improving STV in this area.
Ok for mainline?
2023-06-15 Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
gcc/ChangeLog
PR target/31985
* config/i386/i386.md (*add<dwi>3_doubleword_concat): New
define_insn_and_split combine *add<dwi>3_doubleword with a
*concat<mode><dwi>3 for more efficient lowering after reload.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
PR target/31985
* gcc.target/i386/pr31985.c: New test case.
Roger
--
[-- Attachment #2: patchad2.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2239 bytes --]
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
index e6ebc46..42c302d 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
@@ -6124,6 +6124,36 @@
(clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))])]
"split_double_mode (<DWI>mode, &operands[0], 2, &operands[0], &operands[3]);")
+(define_insn_and_split "*add<dwi>3_doubleword_concat"
+ [(set (match_operand:<DWI> 0 "register_operand" "=&r")
+ (plus:<DWI>
+ (any_or_plus:<DWI>
+ (ashift:<DWI>
+ (zero_extend:<DWI>
+ (match_operand:DWIH 2 "nonimmediate_operand" "rm"))
+ (match_operand:<DWI> 3 "const_int_operand"))
+ (zero_extend:<DWI>
+ (match_operand:DWIH 4 "nonimmediate_operand" "rm")))
+ (match_operand:<DWI> 1 "register_operand" "0")))
+ (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))]
+ "INTVAL (operands[3]) == <MODE_SIZE> * BITS_PER_UNIT"
+ "#"
+ "&& reload_completed"
+ [(parallel [(set (reg:CCC FLAGS_REG)
+ (compare:CCC
+ (plus:DWIH (match_dup 1) (match_dup 4))
+ (match_dup 1)))
+ (set (match_dup 0)
+ (plus:DWIH (match_dup 1) (match_dup 4)))])
+ (parallel [(set (match_dup 5)
+ (plus:DWIH
+ (plus:DWIH
+ (ltu:DWIH (reg:CC FLAGS_REG) (const_int 0))
+ (match_dup 6))
+ (match_dup 2)))
+ (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))])]
+ "split_double_mode (<DWI>mode, &operands[0], 2, &operands[0], &operands[5]);")
+
(define_insn "*add<mode>_1"
[(set (match_operand:SWI48 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=rm,r,r,r")
(plus:SWI48
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr31985.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr31985.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a6de1b5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr31985.c
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target ia32 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+void test_c (unsigned int a, unsigned int b, unsigned int c, unsigned int d)
+{
+ volatile unsigned int x, y;
+ unsigned long long __a = b | ((unsigned long long)a << 32);
+ unsigned long long __b = d | ((unsigned long long)c << 32);
+ unsigned long long __c = __a + __b;
+ x = (unsigned int)(__c & 0xffffffff);
+ y = (unsigned int)(__c >> 32);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "movl" 4 } } */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-15 22:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-06 23:05 Roger Sayle
2023-06-07 6:32 ` Uros Bizjak
2023-06-07 7:07 ` Uros Bizjak
2023-06-15 22:04 ` Roger Sayle [this message]
2023-06-16 7:13 ` Uros Bizjak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='006701d99fd5$63e988c0$2bbc9a40$@nextmovesoftware.com' \
--to=roger@nextmovesoftware.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).