From: "Roger Sayle" <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
To: <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: "'Uros Bizjak'" <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Subject: [x86 PATCH] PR target/31985: Improve memory operand use with doubleword add.
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 00:05:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <037101d998cb$6aa8f120$3ffad360$@nextmovesoftware.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1748 bytes --]
This patch addresses the last remaining issue with PR target/31985, that
GCC could make better use of memory addressing modes when implementing
double word addition. This is achieved by adding a define_insn_and_split
that combines an *add<dwi>3_doubleword with a *concat<mode><dwi>3, so
that the components of the concat can be used directly, without first
being loaded into a double word register.
For test_c in the bugzilla PR:
Before:
pushl %ebx
subl $16, %esp
movl 28(%esp), %eax
movl 36(%esp), %ecx
movl 32(%esp), %ebx
movl 24(%esp), %edx
addl %ecx, %eax
adcl %ebx, %edx
movl %eax, 8(%esp)
movl %edx, 12(%esp)
addl $16, %esp
popl %ebx
ret
After:
test_c:
subl $20, %esp
movl 36(%esp), %eax
movl 32(%esp), %edx
addl 28(%esp), %eax
adcl 24(%esp), %edx
movl %eax, 8(%esp)
movl %edx, 12(%esp)
addl $20, %esp
ret
If this approach is considered acceptable, similar splitters can be
used for other doubleword operations.
This patch has been tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with make bootstrap
and make -k check, both with and without --target_board=unix{-m32}
with no new failures. Ok for mainline?
2023-06-07 Roger Sayle <roger@nextmovesoftware.com>
gcc/ChangeLog
PR target/31985
* config/i386/i386.md (*add<dwi>3_doubleword_concat): New
define_insn_and_split combine *add<dwi>3_doubleword with a
*concat<mode><dwi>3 for more efficient lowering after reload.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
PR target/31985
* gcc.target/i386/pr31985.c: New test case.
Roger
--
[-- Attachment #2: patchad.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2238 bytes --]
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
index e6ebc46..3592249 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.md
@@ -6124,6 +6124,36 @@
(clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))])]
"split_double_mode (<DWI>mode, &operands[0], 2, &operands[0], &operands[3]);")
+(define_insn_and_split "*add<dwi>3_doubleword_concat"
+ [(set (match_operand:<DWI> 0 "register_operand" "=r")
+ (plus:<DWI>
+ (any_or_plus:<DWI>
+ (ashift:<DWI>
+ (zero_extend:<DWI>
+ (match_operand:DWIH 2 "nonimmediate_operand" "rm"))
+ (match_operand:<DWI> 3 "const_int_operand"))
+ (zero_extend:<DWI>
+ (match_operand:DWIH 4 "nonimmediate_operand" "rm")))
+ (match_operand:<DWI> 1 "register_operand" "0")))
+ (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))]
+ "INTVAL (operands[3]) == <MODE_SIZE> * BITS_PER_UNIT"
+ "#"
+ "&& reload_completed"
+ [(parallel [(set (reg:CCC FLAGS_REG)
+ (compare:CCC
+ (plus:DWIH (match_dup 1) (match_dup 4))
+ (match_dup 1)))
+ (set (match_dup 0)
+ (plus:DWIH (match_dup 1) (match_dup 4)))])
+ (parallel [(set (match_dup 5)
+ (plus:DWIH
+ (plus:DWIH
+ (ltu:DWIH (reg:CC FLAGS_REG) (const_int 0))
+ (match_dup 6))
+ (match_dup 2)))
+ (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))])]
+ "split_double_mode (<DWI>mode, &operands[0], 2, &operands[0], &operands[5]);")
+
(define_insn "*add<mode>_1"
[(set (match_operand:SWI48 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=rm,r,r,r")
(plus:SWI48
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr31985.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr31985.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..a6de1b5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr31985.c
@@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
+/* { dg-do compile { target ia32 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O2" } */
+
+void test_c (unsigned int a, unsigned int b, unsigned int c, unsigned int d)
+{
+ volatile unsigned int x, y;
+ unsigned long long __a = b | ((unsigned long long)a << 32);
+ unsigned long long __b = d | ((unsigned long long)c << 32);
+ unsigned long long __c = __a + __b;
+ x = (unsigned int)(__c & 0xffffffff);
+ y = (unsigned int)(__c >> 32);
+}
+
+/* { dg-final { scan-assembler-times "movl" 4 } } */
next reply other threads:[~2023-06-06 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-06 23:05 Roger Sayle [this message]
2023-06-07 6:32 ` Uros Bizjak
2023-06-07 7:07 ` Uros Bizjak
2023-06-15 22:04 ` Roger Sayle
2023-06-16 7:13 ` Uros Bizjak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='037101d998cb$6aa8f120$3ffad360$@nextmovesoftware.com' \
--to=roger@nextmovesoftware.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).