public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>
Cc: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Cgraph alias reorg 15/14 (New infrastructure for same body	aliases)
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 14:04:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110619125142.GA22865@kam.mff.cuni.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110619124502.GA1199@kam.mff.cuni.cz>

> > On Sat, 11 Jun 2011, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > > this patch complettes the same body alias rework by removing the old same body
> > > alias code and adding new representation.  Same body aliases are now separate
> > > function nodes that have IPA_REF_ALIAS reference to the node they are alias of.
> > >
> > > I am still getting one failure:
> > > FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr43879-1_1.C
> > >
> > > It tests IPA PTA in presence of same body aliases.  I honestly have no idea
> > > what is wrong there.  I decided to go ahead with the patch anyway, given the
> > > current state of affair of aliases and IPA-PTA. Hope Richard will help me
> > > fixing this on Monday.
> > 
> > Still there, see again PR49373.  Anything better than a xfail in the works?
> 
> Yes, we discussed the problem with Richi and the issue is that ipa-pta gets
> confused by inliner redirecting edge from alias to the real inline clone.
> The proper fix is to teach passmanager to do small ipa passes before final
> compilation.  I am currently at the GCC gathering, so I plan to implement
> this day after tomorrow after returning.
But for sure we can xfail it.
(It was prevoiusly latent problem and richi did quicker fix but that just
uncovered another problems. Sorry for the delays here).

Honza

  reply	other threads:[~2011-06-19 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-06-11 14:22 Jan Hubicka
2011-06-11 17:31 ` H.J. Lu
2011-06-12  9:02   ` H.J. Lu
2011-06-12 15:08     ` Jan Hubicka
2011-06-12 15:45       ` H.J. Lu
2011-06-12 15:55         ` Jan Hubicka
2011-06-12 16:33         ` H.J. Lu
2011-06-12 16:29       ` H.J. Lu
2011-06-12 17:06         ` Jan Hubicka
2011-06-12 17:46           ` H.J. Lu
2011-06-12 17:13         ` Jan Hubicka
2011-06-12 18:07           ` H.J. Lu
2011-06-12 22:11             ` Jan Hubicka
2011-06-19 12:52 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-06-19 12:55   ` Jan Hubicka
2011-06-19 14:04     ` Jan Hubicka [this message]
2011-06-20 11:23       ` Richard Guenther
2011-06-20 14:47         ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2011-06-22 21:54       ` Hans-Peter Nilsson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110619125142.GA22865@kam.mff.cuni.cz \
    --to=hubicka@ucw.cz \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hp@bitrange.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).