From: Andrea Corallo <andrea.corallo@arm.com>
To: <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>, <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,
"Stam Markianos-Wright" <stam.markianos-wright@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/10] arm: Fix overloading of MVE scalar constant parameters on vbicq, vmvnq_m
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 13:29:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230428113002.482343-6-andrea.corallo@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230428113002.482343-1-andrea.corallo@arm.com>
From: Stam Markianos-Wright <stam.markianos-wright@arm.com>
We found this as part of the wider testsuite updates.
The applicable tests are authored by Andrea earlier in this patch series
Ok for trunk?
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/arm/arm_mve.h (__arm_vbicq): Change coerce on
scalar constant.
(__arm_vmvnq_m): Likewise.
---
gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h b/gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h
index 3d386f320c3..3a1cffb4063 100644
--- a/gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h
+++ b/gcc/config/arm/arm_mve.h
@@ -35906,10 +35906,10 @@ extern void *__ARM_undef;
#define __arm_vbicq(p0,p1) ({ __typeof(p0) __p0 = (p0); \
__typeof(p1) __p1 = (p1); \
_Generic( (int (*)[__ARM_mve_typeid(__p0)][__ARM_mve_typeid(__p1)])0, \
- int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_int16x8_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vbicq_n_s16 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, int16x8_t), __ARM_mve_coerce1 (__p1, int)), \
- int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_int32x4_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vbicq_n_s32 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, int32x4_t), __ARM_mve_coerce1 (__p1, int)), \
- int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_uint16x8_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vbicq_n_u16 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, uint16x8_t), __ARM_mve_coerce1 (__p1, int)), \
- int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_uint32x4_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vbicq_n_u32 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, uint32x4_t), __ARM_mve_coerce1 (__p1, int)), \
+ int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_int16x8_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vbicq_n_s16 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, int16x8_t), __ARM_mve_coerce3 (p1, int)), \
+ int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_int32x4_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vbicq_n_s32 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, int32x4_t), __ARM_mve_coerce3 (p1, int)), \
+ int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_uint16x8_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vbicq_n_u16 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, uint16x8_t), __ARM_mve_coerce3 (p1, int)), \
+ int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_uint32x4_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vbicq_n_u32 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, uint32x4_t), __ARM_mve_coerce3 (p1, int)), \
int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_int8x16_t][__ARM_mve_type_int8x16_t]: __arm_vbicq_s8 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, int8x16_t), __ARM_mve_coerce(__p1, int8x16_t)), \
int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_int16x8_t][__ARM_mve_type_int16x8_t]: __arm_vbicq_s16 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, int16x8_t), __ARM_mve_coerce(__p1, int16x8_t)), \
int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_int32x4_t][__ARM_mve_type_int32x4_t]: __arm_vbicq_s32 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, int32x4_t), __ARM_mve_coerce(__p1, int32x4_t)), \
@@ -38825,10 +38825,10 @@ extern void *__ARM_undef;
#define __arm_vbicq(p0,p1) ({ __typeof(p0) __p0 = (p0); \
__typeof(p1) __p1 = (p1); \
_Generic( (int (*)[__ARM_mve_typeid(__p0)][__ARM_mve_typeid(__p1)])0, \
- int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_int16x8_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vbicq_n_s16 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, int16x8_t), __ARM_mve_coerce1 (__p1, int)), \
- int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_int32x4_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vbicq_n_s32 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, int32x4_t), __ARM_mve_coerce1 (__p1, int)), \
- int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_uint16x8_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vbicq_n_u16 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, uint16x8_t), __ARM_mve_coerce1 (__p1, int)), \
- int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_uint32x4_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vbicq_n_u32 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, uint32x4_t), __ARM_mve_coerce1 (__p1, int)), \
+ int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_int16x8_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vbicq_n_s16 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, int16x8_t), __ARM_mve_coerce3 (p1, int)), \
+ int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_int32x4_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vbicq_n_s32 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, int32x4_t), __ARM_mve_coerce3 (p1, int)), \
+ int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_uint16x8_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vbicq_n_u16 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, uint16x8_t), __ARM_mve_coerce3 (p1, int)), \
+ int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_uint32x4_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vbicq_n_u32 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, uint32x4_t), __ARM_mve_coerce3 (p1, int)), \
int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_int8x16_t][__ARM_mve_type_int8x16_t]: __arm_vbicq_s8 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, int8x16_t), __ARM_mve_coerce(__p1, int8x16_t)), \
int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_int16x8_t][__ARM_mve_type_int16x8_t]: __arm_vbicq_s16 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, int16x8_t), __ARM_mve_coerce(__p1, int16x8_t)), \
int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_int32x4_t][__ARM_mve_type_int32x4_t]: __arm_vbicq_s32 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, int32x4_t), __ARM_mve_coerce(__p1, int32x4_t)), \
@@ -40962,10 +40962,10 @@ extern void *__ARM_undef;
int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_uint8x16_t][__ARM_mve_type_uint8x16_t]: __arm_vmvnq_m_u8 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, uint8x16_t), __ARM_mve_coerce(__p1, uint8x16_t), p2), \
int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_uint16x8_t][__ARM_mve_type_uint16x8_t]: __arm_vmvnq_m_u16 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, uint16x8_t), __ARM_mve_coerce(__p1, uint16x8_t), p2), \
int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_uint32x4_t][__ARM_mve_type_uint32x4_t]: __arm_vmvnq_m_u32 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, uint32x4_t), __ARM_mve_coerce(__p1, uint32x4_t), p2), \
- int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_int16x8_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vmvnq_m_n_s16 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, int16x8_t), __ARM_mve_coerce1(__p1, int) , p2), \
- int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_int32x4_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vmvnq_m_n_s32 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, int32x4_t), __ARM_mve_coerce1(__p1, int) , p2), \
- int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_uint16x8_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vmvnq_m_n_u16 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, uint16x8_t), __ARM_mve_coerce1(__p1, int) , p2), \
- int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_uint32x4_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vmvnq_m_n_u32 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, uint32x4_t), __ARM_mve_coerce1(__p1, int) , p2));})
+ int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_int16x8_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vmvnq_m_n_s16 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, int16x8_t), __ARM_mve_coerce3(p1, int) , p2), \
+ int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_int32x4_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vmvnq_m_n_s32 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, int32x4_t), __ARM_mve_coerce3(p1, int) , p2), \
+ int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_uint16x8_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vmvnq_m_n_u16 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, uint16x8_t), __ARM_mve_coerce3(p1, int) , p2), \
+ int (*)[__ARM_mve_type_uint32x4_t][__ARM_mve_type_int_n]: __arm_vmvnq_m_n_u32 (__ARM_mve_coerce(__p0, uint32x4_t), __ARM_mve_coerce3(p1, int) , p2));})
#define __arm_vorrq_m_n(p0,p1,p2) ({ __typeof(p0) __p0 = (p0); \
_Generic( (int (*)[__ARM_mve_typeid(__p0)])0, \
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-28 11:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-28 11:29 [PATCH 01/10] arm: Mve testsuite improvements Andrea Corallo
2023-04-28 11:29 ` [PATCH 02/10] arm: Fix vstrwq* backend + testsuite Andrea Corallo
2023-04-28 16:27 ` Kyrylo Tkachov
2023-05-02 8:21 ` Christophe Lyon
2023-05-02 8:45 ` Andrea Corallo
2023-05-02 10:18 ` Andrea Corallo
2023-04-28 11:29 ` [PATCH 03/10] arm: Mve backend + testsuite fixes 2 Andrea Corallo
2023-04-28 16:40 ` Kyrylo Tkachov
2023-05-02 11:53 ` Andrea Corallo
2023-04-28 11:29 ` [PATCH 04/10] arm: Stop vadcq, vsbcq intrinsics from overwriting the FPSCR NZ flags Andrea Corallo
2023-04-28 16:45 ` Kyrylo Tkachov
2023-05-03 12:19 ` Stamatis Markianos-Wright
2023-05-03 12:55 ` Kyrylo Tkachov
2023-04-28 11:29 ` [PATCH 05/10] arm: Add vorrq_n overloading into vorrq _Generic Andrea Corallo
2023-04-28 16:47 ` Kyrylo Tkachov
2023-04-28 11:29 ` Andrea Corallo [this message]
2023-04-28 16:47 ` [PATCH 06/10] arm: Fix overloading of MVE scalar constant parameters on vbicq, vmvnq_m Kyrylo Tkachov
2023-04-28 11:29 ` [PATCH 07/10] arm: Fix MVE header pointer overloads this time (and a bit more tidying) Andrea Corallo
2023-04-28 16:51 ` Kyrylo Tkachov
2023-04-28 11:30 ` [PATCH 08/10] arm testsuite: Remove reduntant tests Andrea Corallo
2023-04-28 16:52 ` Kyrylo Tkachov
2023-04-28 11:30 ` [PATCH 09/10] arm testsuite: XFAIL or relax registers in some tests Andrea Corallo
2023-04-28 16:54 ` Kyrylo Tkachov
2023-05-02 12:17 ` Stamatis Markianos-Wright
2023-05-02 8:28 ` Christophe Lyon
2023-05-02 9:33 ` Stamatis Markianos-Wright
2023-04-28 11:30 ` [PATCH 10/10] arm testsuite: Shifts and get_FPSCR ACLE optimisation fixes Andrea Corallo
2023-04-28 16:58 ` Kyrylo Tkachov
2023-05-03 12:34 ` Stamatis Markianos-Wright
2023-05-03 12:56 ` Kyrylo Tkachov
2023-04-28 16:27 ` [PATCH 01/10] arm: Mve testsuite improvements Kyrylo Tkachov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230428113002.482343-6-andrea.corallo@arm.com \
--to=andrea.corallo@arm.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com \
--cc=stam.markianos-wright@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).