From: "Martin Liška" <mliska@suse.cz>
To: Rui Ueyama <rui314@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] lto-plugin: implement LDPT_GET_API_VERSION
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 14:51:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <252fef4a-c9f6-5bb4-2ad4-690cb730b9d6@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACKH++bGPP-ZnUuaNxKXLERhfruM25WVNVp=nnc34c1E52xm4Q@mail.gmail.com>
On 7/11/22 14:24, Rui Ueyama wrote:
> I updated my patch to support the proposed API:
> https://github.com/rui314/mold/commit/22bbfa9bba9beeaf40b76481d175939ee2c62ec8
>
> Martin,
>
> I think you want to apply this patch. Currently, your API always
> passes LAPI_V0 as the maximum API version.
Are you sure?
The function signature is:
(*ld_plugin_get_api_version) (const char *plugin_identifier,
const char *plugin_version,
enum linker_api_version minimal_api_supported,
enum linker_api_version maximal_api_supported,
...
Which means the plug-in always set minimal as LAPI_V0 and maximal
LAPI_V0/V1. That seems correct to me.
Martin
>
> diff --git a/lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c b/lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c
> index e9afd2fb76d..c97bda9de91 100644
> --- a/lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c
> +++ b/lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c
> @@ -1441,15 +1441,15 @@ negotiate_api_version (void)
> const char *linker_version;
>
> enum linker_api_version supported_api = LAPI_V0;
> #if HAVE_PTHREAD_LOCKING
> supported_api = LAPI_V1;
> #endif
>
> - api_version = get_api_version ("GCC", BASE_VERSION, LAPI_V0,
> + api_version = get_api_version ("GCC", BASE_VERSION, LAPI_V1,
> supported_api, &linker_identifier,
> &linker_version);
> if (api_version > supported_api)
> {
> fprintf (stderr, "requested an unsupported API version (%d)\n",
> api_version);
> abort ();
> }
>
> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 6:51 PM Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> wrote:
>>
>> On 7/11/22 11:55, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 11:16 AM Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022, Rui Ueyama wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> but ignoring min_api_supported is wrong, and assuming max_api_supported > 0
>>>>>> is also wrong. It really should check how given [min; max] range intersects
>>>>>> with its own range of supported versions.
>>>>>
>>>>> Currently only one version is defined which is LAPI_V1. I don't think
>>>>> LAPI_UNSPECIFIED is a version number; rather, it's an unspecified
>>>>> value. No ordering should be defined between a defined value and an
>>>>> unspecified value. If LAPI_UNSPECIFIED < LAPI_V1, it should be renamed
>>>>> LAPI_V0.
>>>>
>>>> You still cannot rely on API guarantees of LAPI_V1 when the plugin does not
>>>> advertise it (thread safety of claim_file in this particular case).
>>>
>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> All right, I think we should rename LAPI_UNSPECIFIED to LAPI_V0 in order
>> to support minimal_api_supported == LAPI_V0.
>>
>>> So with LAPI_UNSPECIFIED all the plugin gets is the linker name and version.
>>> Clarifying the documentation on LAPI_UNSPECIFIED might be nice, also
>>> what the expectation is on the linker when the plugin returns
>>> LAPI_UNSPECIFIED when it speficied minimal_api_supported == V1.
>>
>> I've clarified that linker should return a value that is in range
>> [minimal_api_supported, maximal_api_supported] and added an abort
>> if it's not the case.
>>
>> Having that, mold should respect if maximal_api_supported == LAPI_V0 is returned
>> by a plug-in (happens now as we miss locking for some targets).
>>
>> Martin
>>
>>> "minimal_api_supported == LAPI_UNSPECIFIED" does not make much
>>> sense if using Ruis reading of this value?
>>>
>>>> And you still should check the intersection of supported API ranges
>>>> and give a sane diagnostic when min_api_supported advertised by the plugin
>>>> exceeds LAPI_V1 (though, granted, the plugin could error out as well in this
>>>> case).
>>>>
>>>> Alexander
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-11 12:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-02 7:51 [PATCH] Support LDPT_GET_SYMBOLS_V3 Martin Liška
2022-05-04 12:20 ` [PATCH] lto-plugin: add support for feature detection Martin Liška
2022-05-04 12:32 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-05-04 12:41 ` Martin Liška
2022-05-04 13:10 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-05-04 13:31 ` Martin Liška
2022-05-04 15:06 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2022-05-05 6:15 ` Richard Biener
2022-05-05 6:31 ` Richard Biener
2022-05-05 10:52 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-05-05 12:50 ` Martin Liška
2022-05-06 14:46 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-05-09 9:05 ` Martin Liška
2022-05-15 6:57 ` Rui Ueyama
2022-05-15 7:53 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-05-15 8:07 ` Rui Ueyama
2022-05-15 8:50 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-05-15 10:01 ` Rui Ueyama
2022-05-15 10:09 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-05-15 10:32 ` Rui Ueyama
2022-05-15 11:37 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-05-15 11:52 ` Rui Ueyama
2022-05-15 12:07 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-05-16 2:41 ` Rui Ueyama
2022-05-16 6:38 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-05-16 8:37 ` Rui Ueyama
2022-05-16 9:10 ` Richard Biener
2022-05-16 9:15 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-05-16 9:25 ` Jan Hubicka
2022-05-16 9:38 ` Martin Liška
2022-05-16 9:50 ` Jan Hubicka
2022-05-16 10:22 ` Richard Biener
2022-05-16 9:58 ` Rui Ueyama
2022-05-16 10:28 ` Richard Biener
2022-05-16 10:44 ` Rui Ueyama
2022-05-16 12:04 ` Martin Liška
2022-05-16 13:07 ` Rui Ueyama
2022-05-16 13:38 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-05-16 15:16 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-05-17 6:20 ` Richard Biener
2022-05-17 13:44 ` Martin Liška
2022-06-16 6:59 ` [PATCH 1/3] lto-plugin: support LDPT_GET_SYMBOLS_V3 Martin Liška
2022-06-20 9:23 ` Richard Biener
2022-06-16 7:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] lto-plugin: make claim_file_handler thread-safe Martin Liška
2022-06-20 9:32 ` Richard Biener
2022-06-20 10:20 ` Martin Liška
2022-06-21 7:56 ` Richard Biener
2022-06-21 8:43 ` Martin Liška
2022-06-24 8:37 ` Richard Biener
2022-06-16 7:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] lto-plugin: implement LDPT_GET_API_VERSION Martin Liška
2022-06-16 8:00 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-06-16 12:25 ` Martin Liška
2022-06-20 9:35 ` Richard Biener
2022-06-20 13:01 ` Martin Liška
2022-06-30 6:43 ` Rui Ueyama
2022-06-30 8:42 ` Martin Liška
2022-07-01 6:36 ` Richard Biener
2022-07-04 14:17 ` Martin Liška
2022-07-07 2:19 ` Rui Ueyama
2022-07-08 8:42 ` Martin Liška
2022-07-08 12:41 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-07-11 7:23 ` Rui Ueyama
2022-07-11 9:16 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-07-11 9:55 ` Richard Biener
2022-07-11 10:51 ` Martin Liška
2022-07-11 12:24 ` Rui Ueyama
2022-07-11 12:38 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-07-11 12:51 ` Martin Liška [this message]
2022-07-12 1:36 ` Rui Ueyama
2022-07-11 16:35 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-07-12 6:28 ` Richard Biener
2022-07-12 7:36 ` Martin Liška
2022-07-12 11:50 ` Rui Ueyama
2022-07-12 13:21 ` Richard Biener
2022-07-12 13:31 ` Martin Liška
2022-07-13 7:44 ` Rui Ueyama
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=252fef4a-c9f6-5bb4-2ad4-690cb730b9d6@suse.cz \
--to=mliska@suse.cz \
--cc=amonakov@ispras.ru \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=rui314@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).