public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
To: "Jose E. Marchesi" <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
Cc: Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com>,
	 "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Disable sched1 in functions that call setjmp
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 20:31:50 +0300 (MSK)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3183d104-b852-eb38-d5ba-9578594015bd@ispras.ru> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h6xmyqqq.fsf@oracle.com>


On Fri, 23 Dec 2022, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:

> > (scheduling across calls in sched2 is somewhat dubious as well, but
> > it doesn't risk register pressure issues, and on VLIW CPUs it at least
> > can result in better VLIW packing)
> 
> Does sched2 actually schedule across calls?  All the comments in the
> source code stress the fact that the second scheduler pass (after
> register allocation) works in regions that correspond to basic blocks:
> "(after reload, each region is of one block)".

A call instruction does not end a basic block.

(also, with -fsched2-use-superblocks sched2 works on regions like sched1)

Alexander

  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-23 17:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-22 17:32 Jose E. Marchesi
2022-12-22 17:56 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-12-22 19:28   ` Qing Zhao
2022-12-23  7:33     ` Alexander Monakov
2022-12-23 14:34       ` Qing Zhao
2022-12-23 15:03         ` Alexander Monakov
2022-12-23 17:27           ` Jose E. Marchesi
2022-12-23 17:31             ` Alexander Monakov [this message]
2022-12-23 17:45               ` Jose E. Marchesi
2022-12-23 19:21               ` Qing Zhao
2022-12-23 19:36                 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-12-23 19:57                   ` Qing Zhao
2022-12-24  8:10                     ` Alexander Monakov
2022-12-24  9:26                       ` Richard Biener
2022-12-24  9:58                         ` Jose E. Marchesi
2022-12-24 10:06                           ` Richard Biener
2022-12-24 10:18                           ` Alexander Monakov
2022-12-26  0:29                           ` Segher Boessenkool
2023-01-05 18:11                       ` Qing Zhao
2022-12-23 10:05   ` Richard Sandiford
2022-12-23 10:42     ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-01-13 18:20       ` [PATCH] sched-deps: do not schedule pseudos across calls [PR108117] Alexander Monakov
2023-01-13 18:23         ` Richard Sandiford
2023-01-13 18:33         ` Jose E. Marchesi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3183d104-b852-eb38-d5ba-9578594015bd@ispras.ru \
    --to=amonakov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
    --cc=qing.zhao@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).