public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com>
To: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru>
Cc: Jose Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>,
	"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Disable sched1 in functions that call setjmp
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2022 14:34:36 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D53E1E66-F51C-47BF-99B1-EA49BDB29C9E@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cf62c3ec-0a9e-275e-5efa-2689ff1f00e2@ispras.ru>



> On Dec 23, 2022, at 2:33 AM, Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2022, Qing Zhao wrote:
> 
>>> I think scheduling across calls in the pre-RA scheduler is simply an oversight,
>>> we do not look at dataflow information and with 50% chance risk extending
>>> lifetime of a pseudoregister across a call, causing higher register pressure at
>>> the point of the call, and potentially an extra spill.
>> 
>> I am a little confused, you mean pre-RA scheduler does not look at the data flow
>> information at all when scheduling insns across calls currently?
> 
> I think it does not inspect liveness info, and may extend lifetime of a pseudo
> across a call, transforming
> 
>  call foo
>  reg = 1
>  ...
>  use reg
> 
> to
> 
>  reg = 1
>  call foo
>  ...
>  use reg
> 
> but this is undesirable, because now register allocation cannot select a
> call-clobbered register for 'reg’.
Okay, thanks for the explanation.

Then, why not just check the liveness info instead of inhibiting all scheduling across calls?

Qing
> 
> Alexander


  reply	other threads:[~2022-12-23 14:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-22 17:32 Jose E. Marchesi
2022-12-22 17:56 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-12-22 19:28   ` Qing Zhao
2022-12-23  7:33     ` Alexander Monakov
2022-12-23 14:34       ` Qing Zhao [this message]
2022-12-23 15:03         ` Alexander Monakov
2022-12-23 17:27           ` Jose E. Marchesi
2022-12-23 17:31             ` Alexander Monakov
2022-12-23 17:45               ` Jose E. Marchesi
2022-12-23 19:21               ` Qing Zhao
2022-12-23 19:36                 ` Alexander Monakov
2022-12-23 19:57                   ` Qing Zhao
2022-12-24  8:10                     ` Alexander Monakov
2022-12-24  9:26                       ` Richard Biener
2022-12-24  9:58                         ` Jose E. Marchesi
2022-12-24 10:06                           ` Richard Biener
2022-12-24 10:18                           ` Alexander Monakov
2022-12-26  0:29                           ` Segher Boessenkool
2023-01-05 18:11                       ` Qing Zhao
2022-12-23 10:05   ` Richard Sandiford
2022-12-23 10:42     ` Jose E. Marchesi
2023-01-13 18:20       ` [PATCH] sched-deps: do not schedule pseudos across calls [PR108117] Alexander Monakov
2023-01-13 18:23         ` Richard Sandiford
2023-01-13 18:33         ` Jose E. Marchesi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D53E1E66-F51C-47BF-99B1-EA49BDB29C9E@oracle.com \
    --to=qing.zhao@oracle.com \
    --cc=amonakov@ispras.ru \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=jose.marchesi@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).