From: <juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai>
To: "Jeff Law" <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>, jakub <jakub@redhat.com>
Cc: gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
kito.cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>, palmer <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
richard.sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>,
rguenther <rguenther@suse.de>
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] machine_mode type size: Extend enum size from 8-bit to 16-bit
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 07:03:05 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8265FCA64198613F+20230411070304621057216@rivai.ai> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5e938afc-c7eb-d610-1756-8aa834b41681@gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1313 bytes --]
Another feasible solution: Maybe we can drop supporting segment intrinsics
in upstream GCC.
We let the downstream companies support segment in their own downstream GCC ?
juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai
From: Jeff Law
Date: 2023-04-11 04:42
To: juzhe.zhong; jakub
CC: gcc-patches; kito.cheng; palmer; richard.sandiford; rguenther
Subject: Re: [PATCH] machine_mode type size: Extend enum size from 8-bit to 16-bit
On 4/10/23 09:22, juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai wrote:
> Yeah, aarch64 already has 178, RVV has much more types than aarch64...
> You can see intrinsic doc:
> https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/rvv-intrinsic-doc/blob/eopc/tuple-type-for-seg-load-store/auto-generated/intrinsic_funcs/02_vector_unit-stride_segment_load_store_instructions_zvlsseg.md <https://github.com/riscv-non-isa/rvv-intrinsic-doc/blob/eopc/tuple-type-for-seg-load-store/auto-generated/intrinsic_funcs/02_vector_unit-stride_segment_load_store_instructions_zvlsseg.md>
> api number explodes.
>
> As well as tuples types in RVV much more than aarch64.
> Maybe we need to ask RVV api doc maintainer to reduce types && api of RVV?
> Not sure.
> I think kito may help for this.
I think it's a discussion we need to have. I really expect efforts to
have > 256 modes are going to be very controversial.
jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-10 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-10 14:48 juzhe.zhong
2023-04-10 14:54 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-10 15:02 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-04-10 15:14 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-04-11 9:16 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-11 9:46 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-04-11 10:11 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-11 10:25 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-04-11 10:52 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-11 9:46 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-04-11 9:59 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-11 10:11 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-04-11 10:05 ` Richard Earnshaw
2023-04-11 10:15 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-04-11 10:59 ` Richard Biener
2023-04-11 11:11 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-04-11 11:19 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-04-11 13:50 ` Kito Cheng
2023-04-12 7:53 ` Richard Biener
2023-04-12 9:06 ` Kito Cheng
2023-04-12 9:21 ` Richard Biener
2023-04-12 9:31 ` Kito Cheng
2023-04-12 23:22 ` 钟居哲
2023-04-13 13:06 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-04-13 14:02 ` Richard Biener
2023-04-15 2:58 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2023-04-17 6:38 ` Richard Biener
2023-04-20 5:37 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2023-05-05 1:43 ` Li, Pan2
2023-05-05 6:25 ` Richard Biener
2023-05-06 1:10 ` Li, Pan2
2023-05-06 1:53 ` Kito Cheng
2023-05-06 1:59 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-05-06 2:12 ` Li, Pan2
2023-05-06 2:18 ` Kito Cheng
2023-05-06 2:20 ` Li, Pan2
2023-05-06 2:48 ` Li, Pan2
2023-05-07 1:55 ` Li, Pan2
2023-05-07 15:23 ` Jeff Law
2023-05-08 1:07 ` Li, Pan2
2023-05-08 6:29 ` Richard Biener
2023-05-08 6:41 ` Li, Pan2
2023-05-08 6:59 ` Li, Pan2
2023-05-08 7:37 ` Richard Biener
2023-05-08 8:05 ` Li, Pan2
2023-05-09 6:13 ` Li, Pan2
2023-05-09 7:04 ` Richard Biener
2023-05-09 10:16 ` Richard Sandiford
2023-05-09 10:26 ` Richard Biener
2023-05-09 11:50 ` Li, Pan2
2023-05-10 5:09 ` Li, Pan2
2023-05-10 7:22 ` Li, Pan2
2023-05-08 1:35 ` Li, Pan2
2023-04-10 15:18 ` Jakub Jelinek
2023-04-10 15:22 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-04-10 20:42 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-10 23:03 ` juzhe.zhong [this message]
2023-04-11 1:36 ` juzhe.zhong
[not found] ` <20230410232205400970205@rivai.ai>
2023-04-10 15:33 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-04-10 20:39 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-10 20:36 ` Jeff Law
2023-04-10 22:53 ` juzhe.zhong
2023-04-10 15:10 ` Jakub Jelinek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8265FCA64198613F+20230411070304621057216@rivai.ai \
--to=juzhe.zhong@rivai.ai \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jakub@redhat.com \
--cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).