From: Andreas Krebbel <krebbel@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>, GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libgcc: Use initarray section type for .init_stack
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 09:25:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86d73007-692c-51b4-d6a6-fc9265187141@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <050edd6f-0ad9-fbad-a9e5-03ec7b937971@linux.ibm.com>
On 3/20/23 07:33, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of my workmates found there is a warning like:
>
> libgcc/config/rs6000/morestack.S:402: Warning: ignoring
> incorrect section type for .init_array.00000
>
> when compiling libgcc/config/rs6000/morestack.S.
>
> Since commit r13-6545 touched that file recently, which was
> suspected to be responsible for this warning, I did some
> investigation and found this is a warning staying for a long
> time. For section .init_stack*, it's preferred to use
> section type SHT_INIT_ARRAY. So this patch is use
> "@init_array" to replace "@progbits".
>
> Although the warning is trivial, Segher suggested me to
> post this to fix it, in order to avoid any possible
> misunderstanding/confusion on the warning.
>
> As Alan confirmed, this doesn't require a premise check
> on if the existing binutils supports "@init_array" or not,
> "because if you want split-stack to work, you must link
> with gold, any version of binutils that has gold has an
> assembler that understands @init_array". (Thanks Alan!)
>
> Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-redhat-linux
> and powerpc64{,le}-linux-gnu.
>
> Is it ok for trunk when next stage 1 comes?
>
> BR,
> Kewen
> -----
> libgcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * config/i386/morestack.S: Use @init_array rather than
> @progbits for section type of section .init_array.
> * config/rs6000/morestack.S: Likewise.
> * config/s390/morestack.S: Likewise.
s390 parts are ok. I did run a bootstrap and regression. Looks all good. Thanks!
Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-05-25 7:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-20 6:33 Kewen.Lin
2023-05-17 6:24 ` PING^1 " Kewen.Lin
2023-05-25 7:25 ` Andreas Krebbel [this message]
2023-05-31 7:39 ` Kewen.Lin
2023-05-31 7:45 ` Uros Bizjak
2023-05-31 16:57 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2023-06-05 5:24 ` Kewen.Lin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86d73007-692c-51b4-d6a6-fc9265187141@linux.ibm.com \
--to=krebbel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).