public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] testsuite: Add test for r11-4123
@ 2022-08-22 16:57 Marek Polacek
  2022-08-22 17:16 ` Andrew Pinski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marek Polacek @ 2022-08-22 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: GCC Patches, Richard Biener

r11-4123 came without a test but I happened upon a nice test case that
got fixed by that revision.  So I think it'd be good to add it.  The
ICE was:

phi-1.C: In constructor 'ElementManager::ElementManager()':
phi-1.C:28:1: error: missing definition
   28 | ElementManager::ElementManager() : array_(makeArray()) {}
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
for SSA_NAME: _12 in statement:
_10 = PHI <_12(3), _11(5)>
PHI argument
_12
for PHI node
_10 = PHI <_12(3), _11(5)>
during GIMPLE pass: fixup_cfg
phi-1.C:28:1: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

Incidentally, do you think it's safe to backport r11-4123 to GCC 8
(downstream)?  Thanks.

Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C: New test.
---
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..26cade052e3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "-O --param early-inlining-insns=14" }
+
+struct Element;
+template <int _Nm> struct __array_traits { typedef Element _Type[_Nm]; };
+template <int _Nm> struct array {
+  typename __array_traits<_Nm>::_Type _M_elems;
+};
+bool logLevel();
+struct LogCapture {
+  void stream();
+};
+struct Element {
+  Element();
+  long data_;
+};
+using ElementArray = array<6>;
+struct ElementManager {
+  ElementManager();
+  ElementArray array_;
+};
+static ElementArray makeArray() {
+  if (logLevel())
+    LogCapture().stream();
+  ElementArray foo;
+  return foo;
+}
+ElementManager::ElementManager() : array_(makeArray()) {}

base-commit: b6316324fceaef431799a8b386de5cc9881d6898
-- 
2.37.2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Add test for r11-4123
  2022-08-22 16:57 [PATCH] testsuite: Add test for r11-4123 Marek Polacek
@ 2022-08-22 17:16 ` Andrew Pinski
  2022-08-22 17:45   ` [PATCH v2] " Marek Polacek
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Pinski @ 2022-08-22 17:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marek Polacek; +Cc: GCC Patches, Richard Biener

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 9:58 AM Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> r11-4123 came without a test but I happened upon a nice test case that
> got fixed by that revision.  So I think it'd be good to add it.  The
> ICE was:
>
> phi-1.C: In constructor 'ElementManager::ElementManager()':
> phi-1.C:28:1: error: missing definition
>    28 | ElementManager::ElementManager() : array_(makeArray()) {}
>       | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> for SSA_NAME: _12 in statement:
> _10 = PHI <_12(3), _11(5)>
> PHI argument
> _12
> for PHI node
> _10 = PHI <_12(3), _11(5)>
> during GIMPLE pass: fixup_cfg
> phi-1.C:28:1: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
>
> Incidentally, do you think it's safe to backport r11-4123 to GCC 8
> (downstream)?  Thanks.
>
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
>
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
>         * g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C: New test.
> ---
>  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..26cade052e3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> +// { dg-options "-O --param early-inlining-insns=14" }

It seems better to put it in g++.dg/torture and remove -O part.
And then it will be tested for more than before.
Maybe even just mark makeArray as always_inline/inline and you might
be able to remove the param also.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski

> +
> +struct Element;
> +template <int _Nm> struct __array_traits { typedef Element _Type[_Nm]; };
> +template <int _Nm> struct array {
> +  typename __array_traits<_Nm>::_Type _M_elems;
> +};
> +bool logLevel();
> +struct LogCapture {
> +  void stream();
> +};
> +struct Element {
> +  Element();
> +  long data_;
> +};
> +using ElementArray = array<6>;
> +struct ElementManager {
> +  ElementManager();
> +  ElementArray array_;
> +};
> +static ElementArray makeArray() {
> +  if (logLevel())
> +    LogCapture().stream();
> +  ElementArray foo;
> +  return foo;
> +}
> +ElementManager::ElementManager() : array_(makeArray()) {}
>
> base-commit: b6316324fceaef431799a8b386de5cc9881d6898
> --
> 2.37.2
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] testsuite: Add test for r11-4123
  2022-08-22 17:16 ` Andrew Pinski
@ 2022-08-22 17:45   ` Marek Polacek
  2022-08-23  6:27     ` Richard Biener
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Marek Polacek @ 2022-08-22 17:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Pinski; +Cc: GCC Patches, Richard Biener

On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:16:23AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 9:58 AM Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
> <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > r11-4123 came without a test but I happened upon a nice test case that
> > got fixed by that revision.  So I think it'd be good to add it.  The
> > ICE was:
> >
> > phi-1.C: In constructor 'ElementManager::ElementManager()':
> > phi-1.C:28:1: error: missing definition
> >    28 | ElementManager::ElementManager() : array_(makeArray()) {}
> >       | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > for SSA_NAME: _12 in statement:
> > _10 = PHI <_12(3), _11(5)>
> > PHI argument
> > _12
> > for PHI node
> > _10 = PHI <_12(3), _11(5)>
> > during GIMPLE pass: fixup_cfg
> > phi-1.C:28:1: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
> >
> > Incidentally, do you think it's safe to backport r11-4123 to GCC 8
> > (downstream)?  Thanks.
> >
> > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
> >
> > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> >
> >         * g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C: New test.
> > ---
> >  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C
> >
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 00000000000..26cade052e3
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C
> > @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> > +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> > +// { dg-options "-O --param early-inlining-insns=14" }
> 
> It seems better to put it in g++.dg/torture and remove -O part.
> And then it will be tested for more than before.

Sure, I can move it.

> Maybe even just mark makeArray as always_inline/inline and you might
> be able to remove the param also.

I can't, it doesn't reproduce the issue then.

-- >8 --
r11-4123 came without a test but I happened upon a nice test case that
got fixed by that revision.  So I think it'd be good to add it.  The
ICE was:

phi-1.C: In constructor 'ElementManager::ElementManager()':
phi-1.C:28:1: error: missing definition
   28 | ElementManager::ElementManager() : array_(makeArray()) {}
      | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
for SSA_NAME: _12 in statement:
_10 = PHI <_12(3), _11(5)>
PHI argument
_12
for PHI node
_10 = PHI <_12(3), _11(5)>
during GIMPLE pass: fixup_cfg
phi-1.C:28:1: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

	* g++.dg/torture/phi-1.C: New test.
---
 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/phi-1.C | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/phi-1.C

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/phi-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/phi-1.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..69fb3d7ba38
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/phi-1.C
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-options "--param early-inlining-insns=14" }
+
+struct Element;
+template <int _Nm> struct __array_traits { typedef Element _Type[_Nm]; };
+template <int _Nm> struct array {
+  typename __array_traits<_Nm>::_Type _M_elems;
+};
+bool logLevel();
+struct LogCapture {
+  void stream();
+};
+struct Element {
+  Element();
+  long data_;
+};
+using ElementArray = array<6>;
+struct ElementManager {
+  ElementManager();
+  ElementArray array_;
+};
+static ElementArray makeArray() {
+  if (logLevel())
+    LogCapture().stream();
+  ElementArray foo;
+  return foo;
+}
+ElementManager::ElementManager() : array_(makeArray()) {}

base-commit: b6316324fceaef431799a8b386de5cc9881d6898
-- 
2.37.2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] testsuite: Add test for r11-4123
  2022-08-22 17:45   ` [PATCH v2] " Marek Polacek
@ 2022-08-23  6:27     ` Richard Biener
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Richard Biener @ 2022-08-23  6:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Marek Polacek; +Cc: Andrew Pinski, GCC Patches

On Mon, 22 Aug 2022, Marek Polacek wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 10:16:23AM -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 22, 2022 at 9:58 AM Marek Polacek via Gcc-patches
> > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > r11-4123 came without a test but I happened upon a nice test case that
> > > got fixed by that revision.  So I think it'd be good to add it.  The
> > > ICE was:
> > >
> > > phi-1.C: In constructor 'ElementManager::ElementManager()':
> > > phi-1.C:28:1: error: missing definition
> > >    28 | ElementManager::ElementManager() : array_(makeArray()) {}
> > >       | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > for SSA_NAME: _12 in statement:
> > > _10 = PHI <_12(3), _11(5)>
> > > PHI argument
> > > _12
> > > for PHI node
> > > _10 = PHI <_12(3), _11(5)>
> > > during GIMPLE pass: fixup_cfg
> > > phi-1.C:28:1: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

Interesting.  I suspect the issue isn't actually in fixup_cfg though.

> > > Incidentally, do you think it's safe to backport r11-4123 to GCC 8
> > > (downstream)?  Thanks.

It should be safe - the comment says it won't do any edge / PHI arg
re-ordering (which has proved to cause issues in the past).

> > > Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
> > >
> > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > >         * g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C: New test.
> > > ---
> > >  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C
> > >
> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000000..26cade052e3
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/tree-ssa/phi-1.C
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> > > +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> > > +// { dg-options "-O --param early-inlining-insns=14" }
> > 
> > It seems better to put it in g++.dg/torture and remove -O part.
> > And then it will be tested for more than before.
> 
> Sure, I can move it.

The adjusted testcase is OK.

Thanks,
Richard.

> > Maybe even just mark makeArray as always_inline/inline and you might
> > be able to remove the param also.
> 
> I can't, it doesn't reproduce the issue then.
> 
> -- >8 --
> r11-4123 came without a test but I happened upon a nice test case that
> got fixed by that revision.  So I think it'd be good to add it.  The
> ICE was:
> 
> phi-1.C: In constructor 'ElementManager::ElementManager()':
> phi-1.C:28:1: error: missing definition
>    28 | ElementManager::ElementManager() : array_(makeArray()) {}
>       | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> for SSA_NAME: _12 in statement:
> _10 = PHI <_12(3), _11(5)>
> PHI argument
> _12
> for PHI node
> _10 = PHI <_12(3), _11(5)>
> during GIMPLE pass: fixup_cfg
> phi-1.C:28:1: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* g++.dg/torture/phi-1.C: New test.
> ---
>  gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/phi-1.C | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/phi-1.C
> 
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/phi-1.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/phi-1.C
> new file mode 100644
> index 00000000000..69fb3d7ba38
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/torture/phi-1.C
> @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
> +// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
> +// { dg-options "--param early-inlining-insns=14" }
> +
> +struct Element;
> +template <int _Nm> struct __array_traits { typedef Element _Type[_Nm]; };
> +template <int _Nm> struct array {
> +  typename __array_traits<_Nm>::_Type _M_elems;
> +};
> +bool logLevel();
> +struct LogCapture {
> +  void stream();
> +};
> +struct Element {
> +  Element();
> +  long data_;
> +};
> +using ElementArray = array<6>;
> +struct ElementManager {
> +  ElementManager();
> +  ElementArray array_;
> +};
> +static ElementArray makeArray() {
> +  if (logLevel())
> +    LogCapture().stream();
> +  ElementArray foo;
> +  return foo;
> +}
> +ElementManager::ElementManager() : array_(makeArray()) {}
> 
> base-commit: b6316324fceaef431799a8b386de5cc9881d6898
> 

-- 
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstrasse 146, 90461 Nuernberg,
Germany; GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman;
HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-08-23  6:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-08-22 16:57 [PATCH] testsuite: Add test for r11-4123 Marek Polacek
2022-08-22 17:16 ` Andrew Pinski
2022-08-22 17:45   ` [PATCH v2] " Marek Polacek
2022-08-23  6:27     ` Richard Biener

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).