* [PATCH] aarch64: disable LDP via tuning structure for -mcpu=ampere1 @ 2023-04-13 23:21 Philipp Tomsich 2023-04-14 9:20 ` Kyrylo Tkachov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Philipp Tomsich @ 2023-04-13 23:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-patches; +Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov, Philipp Tomsich, Di Zhao AmpereOne (-mcpu=ampere1) breaks LDP instructions into two uops. Given the chance that this causes instructions to slip into the next decoding cycle and the additional overheads when handling cacheline-crossing LDP instructions, we disable the generation of LDP isntructions through the tuning structure from instruction combining (such as in peephole2). Given the code-density benefits in builtins and prologue/epilogue expansion, we allow LDPs there. This commit: * adds a new tuning option AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE * allows -moverride=tune=... to override this Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu> Co-Authored-By: Di Zhao <di.zhao@amperecomputing.com> gcc/ChangeLog: * config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def (AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION): Add AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE. * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_operands_ok_for_ldpstp): Check for the above tuning option when processing loads. --- gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def | 3 +++ gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 8 +++++++- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def index 712895a5263..52112ba7c48 100644 --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("cheap_shift_extend", CHEAP_SHIFT_EXTEND) /* Disallow load/store pair instructions on Q-registers. */ AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("no_ldp_stp_qregs", NO_LDP_STP_QREGS) +/* Disallow load-pair instructions to be formed in combine/peephole. */ +AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("no_ldp_combine", NO_LDP_COMBINE) + AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("rename_load_regs", RENAME_LOAD_REGS) AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("cse_sve_vl_constants", CSE_SVE_VL_CONSTANTS) diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc index f4ef22ce02f..8dc1a9ceb17 100644 --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc @@ -1971,7 +1971,7 @@ static const struct tune_params ampere1a_tunings = 2, /* min_div_recip_mul_df. */ 0, /* max_case_values. */ tune_params::AUTOPREFETCHER_WEAK, /* autoprefetcher_model. */ - (AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NONE), /* tune_flags. */ + (AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE), /* tune_flags. */ &ere1_prefetch_tune }; @@ -26053,6 +26053,12 @@ aarch64_operands_ok_for_ldpstp (rtx *operands, bool load, enum reg_class rclass_1, rclass_2; rtx mem_1, mem_2, reg_1, reg_2; + /* Allow the tuning structure to disable LDP instruction formation + from combining instructions (e.g., in peephole2). */ + if (load && (aarch64_tune_params.extra_tuning_flags + & AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE)) + return false; + if (load) { mem_1 = operands[1]; -- 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] aarch64: disable LDP via tuning structure for -mcpu=ampere1 2023-04-13 23:21 [PATCH] aarch64: disable LDP via tuning structure for -mcpu=ampere1 Philipp Tomsich @ 2023-04-14 9:20 ` Kyrylo Tkachov 2023-04-14 9:31 ` Philipp Tomsich 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Kyrylo Tkachov @ 2023-04-14 9:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philipp Tomsich, gcc-patches; +Cc: Di Zhao Hi Philipp, > -----Original Message----- > From: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu> > Sent: Friday, April 14, 2023 12:22 AM > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com>; Philipp Tomsich > <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu>; Di Zhao <di.zhao@amperecomputing.com> > Subject: [PATCH] aarch64: disable LDP via tuning structure for - > mcpu=ampere1 > > AmpereOne (-mcpu=ampere1) breaks LDP instructions into two uops. > Given the chance that this causes instructions to slip into the next > decoding cycle and the additional overheads when handling > cacheline-crossing LDP instructions, we disable the generation of LDP > isntructions through the tuning structure from instruction combining > (such as in peephole2). > > Given the code-density benefits in builtins and prologue/epilogue > expansion, we allow LDPs there. LDPs are indeed quite an important part of the ISA for code density and there are, in principle, second-order benefits from using them, like keeping the instruction cache footprint low (which can be important for large workloads). Did you gather some benchmarks showing a benefit of disabling them in this manner? > > This commit: > * adds a new tuning option AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE > * allows -moverride=tune=... to override this > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu> > Co-Authored-By: Di Zhao <di.zhao@amperecomputing.com> > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > * config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > (AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION): > Add AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE. > * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_operands_ok_for_ldpstp): > Check for the above tuning option when processing loads. > > --- > > gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def | 3 +++ > gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 8 +++++++- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > index 712895a5263..52112ba7c48 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION > ("cheap_shift_extend", CHEAP_SHIFT_EXTEND) > /* Disallow load/store pair instructions on Q-registers. */ > AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("no_ldp_stp_qregs", > NO_LDP_STP_QREGS) > > +/* Disallow load-pair instructions to be formed in combine/peephole. */ > +AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("no_ldp_combine", > NO_LDP_COMBINE) > + > AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("rename_load_regs", > RENAME_LOAD_REGS) > > AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("cse_sve_vl_constants", > CSE_SVE_VL_CONSTANTS) > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc > index f4ef22ce02f..8dc1a9ceb17 100644 > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc > +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc > @@ -1971,7 +1971,7 @@ static const struct tune_params ampere1a_tunings > = > 2, /* min_div_recip_mul_df. */ > 0, /* max_case_values. */ > tune_params::AUTOPREFETCHER_WEAK, /* autoprefetcher_model. */ > - (AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NONE), /* tune_flags. */ > + (AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE), /* tune_flags. */ > &ere1_prefetch_tune > }; > > @@ -26053,6 +26053,12 @@ aarch64_operands_ok_for_ldpstp (rtx > *operands, bool load, > enum reg_class rclass_1, rclass_2; > rtx mem_1, mem_2, reg_1, reg_2; > > + /* Allow the tuning structure to disable LDP instruction formation > + from combining instructions (e.g., in peephole2). */ > + if (load && (aarch64_tune_params.extra_tuning_flags > + & AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE)) > + return false; If we do decide to do this, I think this is not a complete approach. See the similar tuning flag AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_STP_QREGS. There's various other places in the backend that would need to be adjusted to avoid bringing loads together for the peephole2s to merge (the sched_fusion stuff). Plus there's the cpymem expansions that would generate load pairs too... We'd want some testcases added to check that LDPs are blocked too... Thanks, Kyrill > + > if (load) > { > mem_1 = operands[1]; > -- > 2.34.1 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] aarch64: disable LDP via tuning structure for -mcpu=ampere1 2023-04-14 9:20 ` Kyrylo Tkachov @ 2023-04-14 9:31 ` Philipp Tomsich 2023-04-14 9:51 ` Philipp Tomsich 2023-04-14 10:25 ` Philipp Tomsich 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Philipp Tomsich @ 2023-04-14 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kyrylo Tkachov; +Cc: gcc-patches, Di Zhao Kyrylo, On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 at 11:21, Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com> wrote: > > Hi Philipp, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu> > > Sent: Friday, April 14, 2023 12:22 AM > > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > > Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com>; Philipp Tomsich > > <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu>; Di Zhao <di.zhao@amperecomputing.com> > > Subject: [PATCH] aarch64: disable LDP via tuning structure for - > > mcpu=ampere1 > > > > AmpereOne (-mcpu=ampere1) breaks LDP instructions into two uops. > > Given the chance that this causes instructions to slip into the next > > decoding cycle and the additional overheads when handling > > cacheline-crossing LDP instructions, we disable the generation of LDP > > isntructions through the tuning structure from instruction combining > > (such as in peephole2). > > > > Given the code-density benefits in builtins and prologue/epilogue > > expansion, we allow LDPs there. > > LDPs are indeed quite an important part of the ISA for code density and there are, in principle, second-order benefits from using them, like keeping the instruction cache footprint low (which can be important for large workloads). > Did you gather some benchmarks showing a benefit of disabling them in this manner? This has been benchmark-driven, but I need to follow up separately (as I the final numbers are with the folks that have access to the benchmark machines).. > > > This commit: > > * adds a new tuning option AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE > > * allows -moverride=tune=... to override this > > > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu> > > Co-Authored-By: Di Zhao <di.zhao@amperecomputing.com> > > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > > > * config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > (AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION): > > Add AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE. > > * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_operands_ok_for_ldpstp): > > Check for the above tuning option when processing loads. > > > > --- > > > > gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def | 3 +++ > > gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 8 +++++++- > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > index 712895a5263..52112ba7c48 100644 > > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION > > ("cheap_shift_extend", CHEAP_SHIFT_EXTEND) > > /* Disallow load/store pair instructions on Q-registers. */ > > AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("no_ldp_stp_qregs", > > NO_LDP_STP_QREGS) > > > > +/* Disallow load-pair instructions to be formed in combine/peephole. */ > > +AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("no_ldp_combine", > > NO_LDP_COMBINE) > > + > > AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("rename_load_regs", > > RENAME_LOAD_REGS) > > > > AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("cse_sve_vl_constants", > > CSE_SVE_VL_CONSTANTS) > > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc > > index f4ef22ce02f..8dc1a9ceb17 100644 > > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc > > +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc > > @@ -1971,7 +1971,7 @@ static const struct tune_params ampere1a_tunings > > = > > 2, /* min_div_recip_mul_df. */ > > 0, /* max_case_values. */ > > tune_params::AUTOPREFETCHER_WEAK, /* autoprefetcher_model. */ > > - (AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NONE), /* tune_flags. */ > > + (AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE), /* tune_flags. */ > > &ere1_prefetch_tune > > }; > > > > @@ -26053,6 +26053,12 @@ aarch64_operands_ok_for_ldpstp (rtx > > *operands, bool load, > > enum reg_class rclass_1, rclass_2; > > rtx mem_1, mem_2, reg_1, reg_2; > > > > + /* Allow the tuning structure to disable LDP instruction formation > > + from combining instructions (e.g., in peephole2). */ > > + if (load && (aarch64_tune_params.extra_tuning_flags > > + & AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE)) > > + return false; > > If we do decide to do this, I think this is not a complete approach. See the similar tuning flag AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_STP_QREGS. > There's various other places in the backend that would need to be adjusted to avoid bringing loads together for the peephole2s to merge (the sched_fusion stuff). > Plus there's the cpymem expansions that would generate load pairs too... I have add-on patches for these, but given that I don't have direct access to the benchmarking machine and the benchmarks have been run with this functionality only, I didn't submit them for the time being. Do you see a path to get this in during the current cycle and defer the add-on patches (happy to resubmit as a series) only? > We'd want some testcases added to check that LDPs are blocked too... > > Thanks, > Kyrill > > > + > > if (load) > > { > > mem_1 = operands[1]; > > -- > > 2.34.1 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] aarch64: disable LDP via tuning structure for -mcpu=ampere1 2023-04-14 9:31 ` Philipp Tomsich @ 2023-04-14 9:51 ` Philipp Tomsich 2023-04-14 10:25 ` Philipp Tomsich 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Philipp Tomsich @ 2023-04-14 9:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kyrylo Tkachov; +Cc: gcc-patches, Di Zhao For phase 1, we plan to replace this with a feature to allow finer-grained control over when to use LDP or STP (i.e., control these independently) with the following scopes and policies: - scopes are: { sched-fusion, mem, pro/epilogue, peephole } - policies are: { default (from tuning), always, never, aligned (to 2x element size) } Happy to get this fuller solution already onto the list, if it helps with forward-progress on the localised change. The current patch tries to be minimally invasive (i.e., it doesn't touch STP). It intentionally avoids modifying the sched-fusion logic (which requires refactoring, as it doesn't differentiate between the load and store cases), pro/epilogue creation and mem* function expansion. Philipp. On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 at 11:31, Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu> wrote: > > Kyrylo, > > On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 at 11:21, Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Philipp, > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu> > > > Sent: Friday, April 14, 2023 12:22 AM > > > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > > > Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com>; Philipp Tomsich > > > <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu>; Di Zhao <di.zhao@amperecomputing.com> > > > Subject: [PATCH] aarch64: disable LDP via tuning structure for - > > > mcpu=ampere1 > > > > > > AmpereOne (-mcpu=ampere1) breaks LDP instructions into two uops. > > > Given the chance that this causes instructions to slip into the next > > > decoding cycle and the additional overheads when handling > > > cacheline-crossing LDP instructions, we disable the generation of LDP > > > isntructions through the tuning structure from instruction combining > > > (such as in peephole2). > > > > > > Given the code-density benefits in builtins and prologue/epilogue > > > expansion, we allow LDPs there. > > > > LDPs are indeed quite an important part of the ISA for code density and there are, in principle, second-order benefits from using them, like keeping the instruction cache footprint low (which can be important for large workloads). > > Did you gather some benchmarks showing a benefit of disabling them in this manner? > > > This has been benchmark-driven, but I need to follow up separately (as > I the final numbers are with the folks that have access to the > benchmark machines).. > > > > > > This commit: > > > * adds a new tuning option AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE > > > * allows -moverride=tune=... to override this > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu> > > > Co-Authored-By: Di Zhao <di.zhao@amperecomputing.com> > > > > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > > > > > * config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > > (AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION): > > > Add AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE. > > > * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_operands_ok_for_ldpstp): > > > Check for the above tuning option when processing loads. > > > > > > --- > > > > > > gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def | 3 +++ > > > gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 8 +++++++- > > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > > b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > > index 712895a5263..52112ba7c48 100644 > > > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > > +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > > @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION > > > ("cheap_shift_extend", CHEAP_SHIFT_EXTEND) > > > /* Disallow load/store pair instructions on Q-registers. */ > > > AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("no_ldp_stp_qregs", > > > NO_LDP_STP_QREGS) > > > > > > +/* Disallow load-pair instructions to be formed in combine/peephole. */ > > > +AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("no_ldp_combine", > > > NO_LDP_COMBINE) > > > + > > > AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("rename_load_regs", > > > RENAME_LOAD_REGS) > > > > > > AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("cse_sve_vl_constants", > > > CSE_SVE_VL_CONSTANTS) > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc > > > index f4ef22ce02f..8dc1a9ceb17 100644 > > > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc > > > +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc > > > @@ -1971,7 +1971,7 @@ static const struct tune_params ampere1a_tunings > > > = > > > 2, /* min_div_recip_mul_df. */ > > > 0, /* max_case_values. */ > > > tune_params::AUTOPREFETCHER_WEAK, /* autoprefetcher_model. */ > > > - (AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NONE), /* tune_flags. */ > > > + (AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE), /* tune_flags. */ > > > &ere1_prefetch_tune > > > }; > > > > > > @@ -26053,6 +26053,12 @@ aarch64_operands_ok_for_ldpstp (rtx > > > *operands, bool load, > > > enum reg_class rclass_1, rclass_2; > > > rtx mem_1, mem_2, reg_1, reg_2; > > > > > > + /* Allow the tuning structure to disable LDP instruction formation > > > + from combining instructions (e.g., in peephole2). */ > > > + if (load && (aarch64_tune_params.extra_tuning_flags > > > + & AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE)) > > > + return false; > > > > If we do decide to do this, I think this is not a complete approach. See the similar tuning flag AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_STP_QREGS. > > There's various other places in the backend that would need to be adjusted to avoid bringing loads together for the peephole2s to merge (the sched_fusion stuff). > > Plus there's the cpymem expansions that would generate load pairs too... > > I have add-on patches for these, but given that I don't have direct > access to the benchmarking machine and the benchmarks have been run > with this functionality only, I didn't submit them for the time being. > Do you see a path to get this in during the current cycle and defer > the add-on patches (happy to resubmit as a series) only? > > > We'd want some testcases added to check that LDPs are blocked too... > > > > Thanks, > > Kyrill > > > > > + > > > if (load) > > > { > > > mem_1 = operands[1]; > > > -- > > > 2.34.1 > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] aarch64: disable LDP via tuning structure for -mcpu=ampere1 2023-04-14 9:31 ` Philipp Tomsich 2023-04-14 9:51 ` Philipp Tomsich @ 2023-04-14 10:25 ` Philipp Tomsich 2023-04-14 11:02 ` Kyrylo Tkachov 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Philipp Tomsich @ 2023-04-14 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kyrylo Tkachov; +Cc: gcc-patches, Di Zhao [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5842 bytes --] On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 at 11:31, Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu> wrote: > Kyrylo, > > On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 at 11:21, Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com> > wrote: > > > > Hi Philipp, > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu> > > > Sent: Friday, April 14, 2023 12:22 AM > > > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > > > Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com>; Philipp Tomsich > > > <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu>; Di Zhao <di.zhao@amperecomputing.com> > > > Subject: [PATCH] aarch64: disable LDP via tuning structure for - > > > mcpu=ampere1 > > > > > > AmpereOne (-mcpu=ampere1) breaks LDP instructions into two uops. > > > Given the chance that this causes instructions to slip into the next > > > decoding cycle and the additional overheads when handling > > > cacheline-crossing LDP instructions, we disable the generation of LDP > > > isntructions through the tuning structure from instruction combining > > > (such as in peephole2). > > > > > > Given the code-density benefits in builtins and prologue/epilogue > > > expansion, we allow LDPs there. > > > > LDPs are indeed quite an important part of the ISA for code density and > there are, in principle, second-order benefits from using them, like > keeping the instruction cache footprint low (which can be important for > large workloads). > > Did you gather some benchmarks showing a benefit of disabling them in > this manner? > > This has been benchmark-driven, but I need to follow up separately (as > I the final numbers are with the folks that have access to the > benchmark machines).. > Here are the numbers for the submitted change for AmpereOne: 503.bwaves_r. -0.88% 507.cactuBSSN_r 0.35% 508.namd_r 3.09% 510.parest_r -2.99% 511.povray_r 5.54% 519.lbm_r 15.83% 521.wrf_r 0.56% 526.blender_r 2.47% 527.cam4_r 0.70% 538.imagick_r 0.00% 544.nab_r -0.33% 549.fotonik3d_r. -0.42% 554.roms_r 0.00% = total 1.79% > > > > > This commit: > > > * adds a new tuning option AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE > > > * allows -moverride=tune=... to override this > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu> > > > Co-Authored-By: Di Zhao <di.zhao@amperecomputing.com> > > > > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > > > > > * config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > > (AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION): > > > Add AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE. > > > * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_operands_ok_for_ldpstp): > > > Check for the above tuning option when processing loads. > > > > > > --- > > > > > > gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def | 3 +++ > > > gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 8 +++++++- > > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > > b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > > index 712895a5263..52112ba7c48 100644 > > > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > > +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > > @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION > > > ("cheap_shift_extend", CHEAP_SHIFT_EXTEND) > > > /* Disallow load/store pair instructions on Q-registers. */ > > > AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("no_ldp_stp_qregs", > > > NO_LDP_STP_QREGS) > > > > > > +/* Disallow load-pair instructions to be formed in combine/peephole. > */ > > > +AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("no_ldp_combine", > > > NO_LDP_COMBINE) > > > + > > > AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("rename_load_regs", > > > RENAME_LOAD_REGS) > > > > > > AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("cse_sve_vl_constants", > > > CSE_SVE_VL_CONSTANTS) > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc > b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc > > > index f4ef22ce02f..8dc1a9ceb17 100644 > > > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc > > > +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc > > > @@ -1971,7 +1971,7 @@ static const struct tune_params ampere1a_tunings > > > = > > > 2, /* min_div_recip_mul_df. */ > > > 0, /* max_case_values. */ > > > tune_params::AUTOPREFETCHER_WEAK, /* autoprefetcher_model. */ > > > - (AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NONE), /* tune_flags. */ > > > + (AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE), /* tune_flags. */ > > > &ere1_prefetch_tune > > > }; > > > > > > @@ -26053,6 +26053,12 @@ aarch64_operands_ok_for_ldpstp (rtx > > > *operands, bool load, > > > enum reg_class rclass_1, rclass_2; > > > rtx mem_1, mem_2, reg_1, reg_2; > > > > > > + /* Allow the tuning structure to disable LDP instruction formation > > > + from combining instructions (e.g., in peephole2). */ > > > + if (load && (aarch64_tune_params.extra_tuning_flags > > > + & AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE)) > > > + return false; > > > > If we do decide to do this, I think this is not a complete approach. See > the similar tuning flag AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_STP_QREGS. > > There's various other places in the backend that would need to be > adjusted to avoid bringing loads together for the peephole2s to merge (the > sched_fusion stuff). > > Plus there's the cpymem expansions that would generate load pairs too... > > I have add-on patches for these, but given that I don't have direct > access to the benchmarking machine and the benchmarks have been run > with this functionality only, I didn't submit them for the time being. > Do you see a path to get this in during the current cycle and defer > the add-on patches (happy to resubmit as a series) only? > > > We'd want some testcases added to check that LDPs are blocked too... > > > > Thanks, > > Kyrill > > > > > + > > > if (load) > > > { > > > mem_1 = operands[1]; > > > -- > > > 2.34.1 > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH] aarch64: disable LDP via tuning structure for -mcpu=ampere1 2023-04-14 10:25 ` Philipp Tomsich @ 2023-04-14 11:02 ` Kyrylo Tkachov 2023-04-14 11:16 ` Philipp Tomsich 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Kyrylo Tkachov @ 2023-04-14 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Philipp Tomsich; +Cc: gcc-patches, Di Zhao Hi Philipp, From: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu> Sent: Friday, April 14, 2023 11:26 AM To: Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Di Zhao <di.zhao@amperecomputing.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] aarch64: disable LDP via tuning structure for -mcpu=ampere1 On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 at 11:31, Philipp Tomsich <mailto:philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu> wrote: Kyrylo, On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 at 11:21, Kyrylo Tkachov <mailto:Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com> wrote: > > Hi Philipp, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Philipp Tomsich <mailto:philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu> > > Sent: Friday, April 14, 2023 12:22 AM > > To: mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > > Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov <mailto:Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com>; Philipp Tomsich > > <mailto:philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu>; Di Zhao <mailto:di.zhao@amperecomputing.com> > > Subject: [PATCH] aarch64: disable LDP via tuning structure for - > > mcpu=ampere1 > > > > AmpereOne (-mcpu=ampere1) breaks LDP instructions into two uops. > > Given the chance that this causes instructions to slip into the next > > decoding cycle and the additional overheads when handling > > cacheline-crossing LDP instructions, we disable the generation of LDP > > isntructions through the tuning structure from instruction combining > > (such as in peephole2). > > > > Given the code-density benefits in builtins and prologue/epilogue > > expansion, we allow LDPs there. > > LDPs are indeed quite an important part of the ISA for code density and there are, in principle, second-order benefits from using them, like keeping the instruction cache footprint low (which can be important for large workloads). > Did you gather some benchmarks showing a benefit of disabling them in this manner? >This has been benchmark-driven, but I need to follow up separately (as >I the final numbers are with the folks that have access to the >benchmark machines).. >Here are the numbers for the submitted change for AmpereOne: > 503.bwaves_r. -0.88% > 507.cactuBSSN_r 0.35% > 508.namd_r 3.09% > 510.parest_r -2.99% > 511.povray_r 5.54% > 519.lbm_r 15.83% > 521.wrf_r 0.56% > 526.blender_r 2.47% > 527.cam4_r 0.70% > 538.imagick_r 0.00% > 544.nab_r -0.33% > 549.fotonik3d_r. -0.42% > 554.roms_r 0.00% > = total 1.79% Thanks for getting these, the gains are quite significant. > > > This commit: > > * adds a new tuning option AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE > > * allows -moverride=tune=... to override this > > > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <mailto:philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu> > > Co-Authored-By: Di Zhao <mailto:di.zhao@amperecomputing.com> > > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > > > * config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > (AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION): > > Add AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE. > > * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_operands_ok_for_ldpstp): > > Check for the above tuning option when processing loads. > > > > --- > > > > gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def | 3 +++ > > gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 8 +++++++- > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > index 712895a5263..52112ba7c48 100644 > > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION > > ("cheap_shift_extend", CHEAP_SHIFT_EXTEND) > > /* Disallow load/store pair instructions on Q-registers. */ > > AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("no_ldp_stp_qregs", > > NO_LDP_STP_QREGS) > > > > +/* Disallow load-pair instructions to be formed in combine/peephole. */ > > +AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("no_ldp_combine", > > NO_LDP_COMBINE) > > + > > AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("rename_load_regs", > > RENAME_LOAD_REGS) > > > > AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("cse_sve_vl_constants", > > CSE_SVE_VL_CONSTANTS) > > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc > > index f4ef22ce02f..8dc1a9ceb17 100644 > > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc > > +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc > > @@ -1971,7 +1971,7 @@ static const struct tune_params ampere1a_tunings > > = > > 2, /* min_div_recip_mul_df. */ > > 0, /* max_case_values. */ > > tune_params::AUTOPREFETCHER_WEAK, /* autoprefetcher_model. */ > > - (AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NONE), /* tune_flags. */ > > + (AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE), /* tune_flags. */ > > &ere1_prefetch_tune > > }; > > > > @@ -26053,6 +26053,12 @@ aarch64_operands_ok_for_ldpstp (rtx > > *operands, bool load, > > enum reg_class rclass_1, rclass_2; > > rtx mem_1, mem_2, reg_1, reg_2; > > > > + /* Allow the tuning structure to disable LDP instruction formation > > + from combining instructions (e.g., in peephole2). */ > > + if (load && (aarch64_tune_params.extra_tuning_flags > > + & AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE)) > > + return false; > > If we do decide to do this, I think this is not a complete approach. See the similar tuning flag AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_STP_QREGS. > There's various other places in the backend that would need to be adjusted to avoid bringing loads together for the peephole2s to merge (the sched_fusion stuff). > Plus there's the cpymem expansions that would generate load pairs too... >I have add-on patches for these, but given that I don't have direct >access to the benchmarking machine and the benchmarks have been run >with this functionality only, I didn't submit them for the time being. >Do you see a path to get this in during the current cycle and defer >the add-on patches (happy to resubmit as a series) only? Yeah, I agree that we'll want something with minimal risk at this stage. Just to confirm, have you tried the pre-existing AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_STP_QREGS for AmpereOne and it didn't give the benefit that this patch does? I would think that AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_STP_QREGS would be beneficial as well, though maybe blocking Q-reg STPs is undesirable? If you are planning to implement this properly in stage 1 for GCC 14 then I'd be okay with this approach if you add a TODO marker in this hunk describing the work needed to do this more comprehensively. It seems we'll want a more flexible hierarchy for controlling the emission LDPs, STPs per mode size similar to how we use cpu_approx_modes ☹ Talking offline to Richard, one thing you may want to try is restricting LDP formation to only aligned addresses, similar to what AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_SLOW_UNALIGNED_LDPW does. But this patch is okay for trunk if testing shows no problems. Looking forward to a stage 1 series 😊 Thanks, Kyrill > We'd want some testcases added to check that LDPs are blocked too... > > Thanks, > Kyrill > > > + > > if (load) > > { > > mem_1 = operands[1]; > > -- > > 2.34.1 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] aarch64: disable LDP via tuning structure for -mcpu=ampere1 2023-04-14 11:02 ` Kyrylo Tkachov @ 2023-04-14 11:16 ` Philipp Tomsich 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Philipp Tomsich @ 2023-04-14 11:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Kyrylo Tkachov; +Cc: gcc-patches, Di Zhao [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8064 bytes --] On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 at 13:02, Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com> wrote: > Hi Philipp, > > From: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu> > Sent: Friday, April 14, 2023 11:26 AM > To: Kyrylo Tkachov <Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com> > Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Di Zhao <di.zhao@amperecomputing.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] aarch64: disable LDP via tuning structure for > -mcpu=ampere1 > > > > On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 at 11:31, Philipp Tomsich <mailto: > philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu> wrote: > Kyrylo, > > On Fri, 14 Apr 2023 at 11:21, Kyrylo Tkachov <mailto: > Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com> wrote: > > > > Hi Philipp, > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Philipp Tomsich <mailto:philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu> > > > Sent: Friday, April 14, 2023 12:22 AM > > > To: mailto:gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org > > > Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov <mailto:Kyrylo.Tkachov@arm.com>; Philipp Tomsich > > > <mailto:philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu>; Di Zhao <mailto: > di.zhao@amperecomputing.com> > > > Subject: [PATCH] aarch64: disable LDP via tuning structure for - > > > mcpu=ampere1 > > > > > > AmpereOne (-mcpu=ampere1) breaks LDP instructions into two uops. > > > Given the chance that this causes instructions to slip into the next > > > decoding cycle and the additional overheads when handling > > > cacheline-crossing LDP instructions, we disable the generation of LDP > > > isntructions through the tuning structure from instruction combining > > > (such as in peephole2). > > > > > > Given the code-density benefits in builtins and prologue/epilogue > > > expansion, we allow LDPs there. > > > > LDPs are indeed quite an important part of the ISA for code density and > there are, in principle, second-order benefits from using them, like > keeping the instruction cache footprint low (which can be important for > large workloads). > > Did you gather some benchmarks showing a benefit of disabling them in > this manner? > > >This has been benchmark-driven, but I need to follow up separately (as > >I the final numbers are with the folks that have access to the > >benchmark machines).. > > >Here are the numbers for the submitted change for AmpereOne: > > 503.bwaves_r. -0.88% > > 507.cactuBSSN_r 0.35% > > 508.namd_r 3.09% > > 510.parest_r -2.99% > > 511.povray_r 5.54% > > 519.lbm_r 15.83% > > 521.wrf_r 0.56% > > 526.blender_r 2.47% > > 527.cam4_r 0.70% > > 538.imagick_r 0.00% > > 544.nab_r -0.33% > > 549.fotonik3d_r. -0.42% > > 554.roms_r 0.00% > > = total 1.79% > > Thanks for getting these, the gains are quite significant. > > > > > > This commit: > > > * adds a new tuning option AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE > > > * allows -moverride=tune=... to override this > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Philipp Tomsich <mailto:philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu> > > > Co-Authored-By: Di Zhao <mailto:di.zhao@amperecomputing.com> > > > > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > > > > > * config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > > (AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION): > > > Add AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE. > > > * config/aarch64/aarch64.cc (aarch64_operands_ok_for_ldpstp): > > > Check for the above tuning option when processing loads. > > > > > > --- > > > > > > gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def | 3 +++ > > > gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc | 8 +++++++- > > > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > > b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > > index 712895a5263..52112ba7c48 100644 > > > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > > +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-tuning-flags.def > > > @@ -44,6 +44,9 @@ AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION > > > ("cheap_shift_extend", CHEAP_SHIFT_EXTEND) > > > /* Disallow load/store pair instructions on Q-registers. */ > > > AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("no_ldp_stp_qregs", > > > NO_LDP_STP_QREGS) > > > > > > +/* Disallow load-pair instructions to be formed in combine/peephole. > */ > > > +AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("no_ldp_combine", > > > NO_LDP_COMBINE) > > > + > > > AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("rename_load_regs", > > > RENAME_LOAD_REGS) > > > > > > AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNING_OPTION ("cse_sve_vl_constants", > > > CSE_SVE_VL_CONSTANTS) > > > diff --git a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc > b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc > > > index f4ef22ce02f..8dc1a9ceb17 100644 > > > --- a/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc > > > +++ b/gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64.cc > > > @@ -1971,7 +1971,7 @@ static const struct tune_params ampere1a_tunings > > > = > > > 2, /* min_div_recip_mul_df. */ > > > 0, /* max_case_values. */ > > > tune_params::AUTOPREFETCHER_WEAK, /* autoprefetcher_model. */ > > > - (AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NONE), /* tune_flags. */ > > > + (AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE), /* tune_flags. */ > > > &ere1_prefetch_tune > > > }; > > > > > > @@ -26053,6 +26053,12 @@ aarch64_operands_ok_for_ldpstp (rtx > > > *operands, bool load, > > > enum reg_class rclass_1, rclass_2; > > > rtx mem_1, mem_2, reg_1, reg_2; > > > > > > + /* Allow the tuning structure to disable LDP instruction formation > > > + from combining instructions (e.g., in peephole2). */ > > > + if (load && (aarch64_tune_params.extra_tuning_flags > > > + & AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_COMBINE)) > > > + return false; > > > > If we do decide to do this, I think this is not a complete approach. See > the similar tuning flag AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_STP_QREGS. > > There's various other places in the backend that would need to be > adjusted to avoid bringing loads together for the peephole2s to merge (the > sched_fusion stuff). > > Plus there's the cpymem expansions that would generate load pairs too... > > >I have add-on patches for these, but given that I don't have direct > >access to the benchmarking machine and the benchmarks have been run > >with this functionality only, I didn't submit them for the time being. > >Do you see a path to get this in during the current cycle and defer > >the add-on patches (happy to resubmit as a series) only? > > Yeah, I agree that we'll want something with minimal risk at this stage. > Just to confirm, have you tried the pre-existing > AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_STP_QREGS for AmpereOne and it didn't give the > benefit that this patch does? > I would think that AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_NO_LDP_STP_QREGS would be beneficial > as well, though maybe blocking Q-reg STPs is undesirable? > The issue on lbm are LDPs on 64bit registers that are not aligned to to a 16byte boundary (i.e., only naturally aligned). Disabling LDPs for 32bit quantities provided some small additive gains. So disabling Q-regs doesn't help and should even be beneficial in the memcpy case. > If you are planning to implement this properly in stage 1 for GCC 14 then > I'd be okay with this approach if you add a TODO marker in this hunk > describing the work needed to do this more comprehensively. > It seems we'll want a more flexible hierarchy for controlling the emission > LDPs, STPs per mode size similar to how we use cpu_approx_modes ☹ > Talking offline to Richard, one thing you may want to try is restricting > LDP formation to only aligned addresses, similar to what > AARCH64_EXTRA_TUNE_SLOW_UNALIGNED_LDPW does. But this patch is okay for trunk if testing shows no problems. > I'll resubmit with the two following changes - the TODO marker - the testcase asking for an OK. Philipp. > Looking forward to a stage 1 series 😊 > Thanks, > Kyrill > > > We'd want some testcases added to check that LDPs are blocked too... > > > > Thanks, > > Kyrill > > > > > + > > > if (load) > > > { > > > mem_1 = operands[1]; > > > -- > > > 2.34.1 > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-04-14 11:16 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2023-04-13 23:21 [PATCH] aarch64: disable LDP via tuning structure for -mcpu=ampere1 Philipp Tomsich 2023-04-14 9:20 ` Kyrylo Tkachov 2023-04-14 9:31 ` Philipp Tomsich 2023-04-14 9:51 ` Philipp Tomsich 2023-04-14 10:25 ` Philipp Tomsich 2023-04-14 11:02 ` Kyrylo Tkachov 2023-04-14 11:16 ` Philipp Tomsich
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).