public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hongtao Liu <crazylht@gmail.com>
To: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Cc: liuhongt <hongtao.liu@intel.com>,
	 "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] Extend 16/32-bit vector bit_op patterns with (m, 0, i) alternative.
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2022 14:54:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMZc-bxQzw8eTAyMT1_BSQQNY=3f4ArR-S7BNa_1Z13A5PhJiw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFULd4aJ10+CwBwE-abx-2VyQR0bndVdC-FCuZ82omN29U-TKw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 2:18 PM Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 8:14 AM Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2022 at 4:37 AM Hongtao Liu <crazylht@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 5:37 PM Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 8:56 AM Hongtao Liu <crazylht@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 2:35 PM Uros Bizjak via Gcc-patches
> > > > > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 8:07 AM liuhongt <hongtao.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And split it after reload.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You will need ix86_binary_operator_ok insn constraint here with
> > > > > > > > corresponding expander using ix86_fixup_binary_operands_no_copy to
> > > > > > > > prepare insn operands.
> > > > > > > Split define_expand with just register_operand, and allow
> > > > > > > memory/immediate in define_insn, assume combine/forwprop will do optimization.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But you will *ease* the job of the above passes if you use
> > > > > > ix86_fixup_binary_operands_no_copy in the expander.
> > > > > for -m32, it will hit ICE in
> > > > > Breakpoint 1, ix86_fixup_binary_operands_no_copy (code=XOR,
> > > > > mode=E_V4QImode, operands=0x7fffffffa970) a
> > > > > /gcc/config/i386/i386-expand.cc:1184
> > > > > 1184      rtx dst = ix86_fixup_binary_operands (code, mode, operands);
> > > > > (gdb) n
> > > > > 1185      gcc_assert (dst == operands[0]); -- here
> > > > > (gdb)
> > > > >
> > > > > the original operands[0], operands[1], operands[2] are below
> > > > > (gdb) p debug_rtx (operands[0])
> > > > > (mem/c:V4QI (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 77 virtual-stack-vars)
> > > > >         (const_int -8220 [0xffffffffffffdfe4])) [0 MEM <vector(4)
> > > > > unsigned char> [(unsigned char *)&tmp2 + 4B]+0 S4 A32])
> > > > > $1 = void
> > > > > (gdb) p debug_rtx (operands[1])
> > > > > (subreg:V4QI (reg:SI 129) 0)
> > > > > $2 = void
> > > > > (gdb) p debug_rtx (operands[2])
> > > > > (subreg:V4QI (reg:SI 98 [ _46 ]) 0)
> > > > > $3 = void
> > > > > (gdb)
> > > > >
> > > > > since operands[0] is mem and not equal to operands[1],
> > > > > ix86_fixup_binary_operands will create a pseudo register for dst. and
> > > > > then hit ICE.
> > > > > Is this a bug or assumed?
> > > >
> > > > You will need ix86_expand_binary_operator here.
> > > It will swap memory operand from op1 to op2 and hit ICE for unrecognized insn.
> > >
> > > What about this?
> >
> > Still no good... You are using commutative operands, so the predicate
> > of operand 2 should also allow memory. So, the predicate should be
> > nonimmediate_or_x86_64_const_vector_operand. The intermediate insn
> > pattern should look something like *<any_or:code><mode>_1, but with
> > added XMM and MMX reg alternatives instead of mask regs.
>
> Alternatively, you can use UNKNOWN operator to prevent
> canonicalization, but then you should not use commutative constraint
> in the intermediate insn. I think this is the best solution.
Like this?

-(define_insn "<code><mode>3"
-  [(set (match_operand:VI_16_32 0 "register_operand" "=?r,x,x,v")
+(define_expand "<code><mode>3"
+  [(set (match_operand:VI_16_32 0 "nonimmediate_operand")
         (any_logic:VI_16_32
-         (match_operand:VI_16_32 1 "register_operand" "%0,0,x,v")
-         (match_operand:VI_16_32 2 "register_operand" "r,x,x,v")))
-   (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))]
+         (match_operand:VI_16_32 1 "nonimmediate_operand")
+         (match_operand:VI_16_32 2
"register_or_x86_64_const_vector_operand")))]
   ""
+{
+  rtx dst = ix86_fixup_binary_operands (<CODE>, <MODE>mode, operands);
+  if (MEM_P (operands[2]))
+    operands[2] = force_reg (<MODE>mode, operands[2]);
+  rtx op = gen_rtx_SET (dst, gen_rtx_fmt_ee (<CODE>, <MODE>mode,
+                                            operands[1], operands[2]));
+  rtx clob = gen_rtx_CLOBBER (VOIDmode, gen_rtx_REG (CCmode, FLAGS_REG));
+  emit_insn (gen_rtx_PARALLEL (VOIDmode, gen_rtvec (2, op, clob)));
+  if (dst != operands[0])
+    emit_move_insn (operands[0], dst);
+   DONE;
+})
+
+(define_insn "*<code><mode>3"
+  [(set (match_operand:VI_16_32 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=?r,m,x,x,v")
+        (any_logic:VI_16_32
+         (match_operand:VI_16_32 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "0,0,0,x,v")
+         (match_operand:VI_16_32 2
"register_or_x86_64_const_vector_operand" "r,i,x,x,v")))
+   (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))]
+  "ix86_binary_operator_ok (UNKNOWN, <MODE>mode, operands)"
   "#"
-  [(set_attr "isa" "*,sse2_noavx,avx,avx512vl")
-   (set_attr "type" "alu,sselog,sselog,sselog")
-   (set_attr "mode" "SI,TI,TI,TI")])
+  [(set_attr "isa" "*,*,sse2_noavx,avx,avx512vl")
+   (set_attr "type" "alu,alu,sselog,sselog,sselog")
+   (set_attr "mode" "SI,SI,TI,TI,TI")])

>
> Uros.
>
> > >
> > > -(define_insn "<code><mode>3"
> > > -  [(set (match_operand:VI_16_32 0 "register_operand" "=?r,x,x,v")
> > > +(define_expand "<code><mode>3"
> > > +  [(set (match_operand:VI_16_32 0 "nonimmediate_operand")
> > >          (any_logic:VI_16_32
> > > -         (match_operand:VI_16_32 1 "register_operand" "%0,0,x,v")
> > > -         (match_operand:VI_16_32 2 "register_operand" "r,x,x,v")))
> > > -   (clobber (reg:CC FLAGS_REG))]
> > > +         (match_operand:VI_16_32 1 "nonimmediate_operand")
> > > +         (match_operand:VI_16_32 2
> > > "register_or_x86_64_const_vector_operand")))]
> > >    ""
> > > +{
> > > +  rtx dst = ix86_fixup_binary_operands (<CODE>, <MODE>mode, operands);
> > > +  if (MEM_P (operands[2]))
> > > +    operands[2] = force_reg (<MODE>mode, operands[2]);
> > > +  rtx op = gen_rtx_SET (dst, gen_rtx_fmt_ee (<CODE>, <MODE>mode,
> > > +                                            operands[1], operands[2]));
> > > +  rtx clob = gen_rtx_CLOBBER (VOIDmode, gen_rtx_REG (CCmode, FLAGS_REG));
> > > +  emit_insn (gen_rtx_PARALLEL (VOIDmode, gen_rtvec (2, op, clob)));
> > > +  if (dst != operands[0])
> > > +    emit_move_insn (operands[0], dst);
> > > +   DONE;
> > > +})
> > > +
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Uros.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > BR,
> > > Hongtao



-- 
BR,
Hongtao

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-20  6:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-11  1:15 [PATCH] Allocate general register(memory/immediate) for 16/32/64-bit vector bit_op patterns liuhongt
2022-07-11  8:02 ` Uros Bizjak
2022-07-12  6:37   ` Hongtao Liu
2022-07-12  7:15     ` Uros Bizjak
2022-07-14  5:33       ` [PATCH] Extend 64-bit vector bit_op patterns with ?r alternative liuhongt
2022-07-14  7:22         ` Uros Bizjak
2022-07-14  9:32           ` Hongtao Liu
2022-07-14  9:46             ` Uros Bizjak
2022-07-18  1:59               ` [PATCH] Extend 16/32-bit vector bit_op patterns with (m, 0, i)(vertical) alternative liuhongt
2022-07-18  6:28                 ` [PATCH] Extend 16/32-bit vector bit_op patterns with (m,0,i)(vertical) alternative Uros Bizjak
2022-07-19  6:07                   ` [PATCH V2] Extend 16/32-bit vector bit_op patterns with (m, 0, i) alternative liuhongt
2022-07-19  6:34                     ` Uros Bizjak
2022-07-19  6:56                       ` Hongtao Liu
2022-07-19  9:37                         ` Uros Bizjak
2022-07-20  2:37                           ` Hongtao Liu
2022-07-20  6:14                             ` Uros Bizjak
2022-07-20  6:18                               ` Uros Bizjak
2022-07-20  6:54                                 ` Hongtao Liu [this message]
2022-07-20  7:18                                   ` Uros Bizjak
2022-07-20  7:22                                     ` Hongtao Liu
2022-07-21  5:18                                       ` [PATCH V3] " liuhongt
2022-07-21  5:55                                         ` Uros Bizjak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMZc-bxQzw8eTAyMT1_BSQQNY=3f4ArR-S7BNa_1Z13A5PhJiw@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=crazylht@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hongtao.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).