From: Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
To: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>, "Kewen.Lin" <linkw@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>,
Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net>,
David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>,
Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
Kewen Lin <linkw@gcc.gnu.org>,
Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>,
GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] [testsuite] require sqrt_insn effective target where needed
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 10:14:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D6139E40-1410-4E5A-8705-F64DFF2852B5@sandoe.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6de1dd9d-de60-6a0c-7a25-67533957e62b@linux.ibm.com>
Hi Folks,
> On 23 Apr 2024, at 09:59, Kewen.Lin <linkw@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> on 2024/4/22 17:56, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> This patch takes feedback received for 3 earlier patches, and adopts a
>> simpler approach to skip the still-failing tests, that I believe to be
>> in line with ppc maintainers' expressed preferences.
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-February/565939.html
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-March/566617.html
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-March/566521.html
>> Ping?-ish :-)
>>
>>
>> Some tests fail on ppc and ppc64 when testing a compiler [with options
>> for] for a CPU [emulator] that doesn't support the sqrt insn.
>>
>> The gcc.dg/cdce3.c is one in which the expected shrink-wrap
>> optimization only takes place when the target CPU supports a sqrt
>> insn.
>>
>> The gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-1[0-4].c tests use -mpowerpc-gpopt and
>> call sqrt(), which involves the sqrt insn that the target CPU under
>> test may not support.
>>
>> Require a sqrt_insn effective target for all the affected tests.
>>
>> Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu and ppc64el-linux-gnu. Also testing
>> with gcc-13 on ppc64-vx7r2 and ppc-vx7r2. Ok to install?
>>
>>
>> for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>>
>> * gcc.dg/cdce3.c: Require sqrt_insn effective target.
>> * gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-10.c: Likewise.
>> * gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-11.c: Likewise.
>> * gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-13.c: Likewise.
>> * gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-14.c: Likewise.
>> ---
>> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cdce3.c | 3 ++-
>> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-10.c | 1 +
>> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-11.c | 1 +
>> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-13.c | 1 +
>> gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-14.c | 1 +
>> 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cdce3.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cdce3.c
>> index 601ddf055fd71..f759a95972e8b 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cdce3.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/cdce3.c
>> @@ -1,7 +1,8 @@
>> /* { dg-do compile } */
>> /* { dg-require-effective-target hard_float } */
>> +/* { dg-require-effective-target sqrt_insn } */
>> /* { dg-options "-O2 -fmath-errno -fdump-tree-cdce-details -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
>> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "cdce3.c:11: \[^\n\r]* function call is shrink-wrapped into error conditions\." "cdce" } } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "cdce3.c:12: \[^\n\r]* function call is shrink-wrapped into error conditions\." "cdce" } } */
>> /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump "sqrtf \\(\[^\n\r]*\\); \\\[tail call\\\]" "optimized" } } */
>> /* { dg-skip-if "doesn't have a sqrtf insn" { mmix-*-* } } */
>>
>
> This change needs an approval from global maintainer as it touches a generic test case?
>
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-10.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-10.c
>> index 3be4728d333a4..7e9bb638106c2 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-10.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-10.c
>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>> /* { dg-do run } */
>> /* { dg-skip-if "-mpowerpc-gpopt not supported" { powerpc*-*-darwin* } } */
>> /* { dg-options "-O2 -ffast-math -fno-inline -fno-unroll-loops -lm -mpowerpc-gpopt" } */
>> +/* { dg-require-effective-target sqrt_insn } */
>
> This change looks sensible to me.
>
> Nit: With the proposed change, I'd expect that we can remove the line for powerpc*-*-darwin*.
>
> CC Iain to confirm.
Indeed, the check for sqrt_insn fails and so the test is unsupported without needing the separate
powerpc*-*-darwin* line,
thanks,
Iain
>
> BR,
> Kewen
>
>>
>> #include <math.h>
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-11.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-11.c
>> index 43b6728a4b812..5bfa25925675a 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-11.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-11.c
>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>> /* { dg-do run } */
>> /* { dg-skip-if "-mpowerpc-gpopt not supported" { powerpc*-*-darwin* } } */
>> /* { dg-options "-O2 -ffast-math -fno-inline -fno-unroll-loops -lm -mpowerpc-gpopt" } */
>> +/* { dg-require-effective-target sqrt_insn } */
>>
>> #include <math.h>
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-13.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-13.c
>> index b9fd63973b728..b66d0209a5e54 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-13.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-13.c
>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>> /* { dg-do run } */
>> /* { dg-skip-if "-mpowerpc-gpopt not supported" { powerpc*-*-darwin* } } */
>> /* { dg-options "-O2 -ffast-math -fno-inline -fno-unroll-loops -lm -mpowerpc-gpopt" } */
>> +/* { dg-require-effective-target sqrt_insn } */
>>
>> #include <math.h>
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-14.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-14.c
>> index 5affff13bdb6c..71a1a70c4e7a2 100644
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-14.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/pr46728-14.c
>> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>> /* { dg-do run } */
>> /* { dg-skip-if "-mpowerpc-gpopt not supported" { powerpc*-*-darwin* } } */
>> /* { dg-options "-O2 -ffast-math -fno-inline -fno-unroll-loops -lm -mpowerpc-gpopt" } */
>> +/* { dg-require-effective-target sqrt_insn } */
>>
>> #include <math.h>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-23 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-10 5:30 enable sqrt insns for cdce3.c Alexandre Oliva
2021-03-10 17:11 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2021-03-11 16:04 ` Alexandre Oliva
2024-04-22 9:50 ` Alexandre Oliva
2024-04-23 15:38 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2024-04-28 7:40 ` Alexandre Oliva
2021-03-20 15:20 ` Jeff Law
2024-04-22 9:56 ` [PATCH v2] [testsuite] require sqrt_insn effective target where needed Alexandre Oliva
2024-04-23 8:59 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-04-23 9:14 ` Iain Sandoe [this message]
2024-04-28 7:37 ` Alexandre Oliva
2024-04-24 2:15 ` Mike Stump
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D6139E40-1410-4E5A-8705-F64DFF2852B5@sandoe.co.uk \
--to=iain@sandoe.co.uk \
--cc=dje.gcc@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hp@bitrange.com \
--cc=linkw@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=linkw@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mikestump@comcast.net \
--cc=oliva@adacore.com \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
--cc=ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE \
--cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).