From: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@adacore.com>
To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org,
Rainer Orth <ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de>,
Mike Stump <mikestump@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: enable sqrt insns for cdce3.c
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 06:50:49 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <orsezdn2ti.fsf@lxoliva.fsfla.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.20.16.2103101202250.12461@arjuna.pair.com> (Hans-Peter Nilsson's message of "Wed, 10 Mar 2021 12:11:34 -0500 (EST)")
[Revamped version of this patch, combined with others, to follow]
On Mar 10, 2021, Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp@bitrange.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>
>> The test expects shrink-wrapping of the fsqrt call, but that will only
>> occur when there is a usable sqrt insn.
>>
>> Arrange for dejagnu to add the options that enable the sqrt insn, if
>> one is available, and to skip the test otherwise.
>>
>>
>> H-P, this *should* obviate the mmix-specific dg-skip-if.
> Unfortunately it doesn't.
>> Would it be
>> easy for you to confirm that this is the case and, if so, drop it?
> About as easy as for anyone (this is a compile-test), but no
> problem. Unfortunately I get, with your patch applied and the
> dg-skip-if removed:
> FAIL: gcc.dg/cdce3.c scan-tree-dump cdce "cdce3.c:12: [^\n\r]*
> function call is shrink-wrapped into error conditions."
Is mmix a sqrt_insn effective target? proc
check_effective_target_sqrt_insn in
gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp suggests it shouldn't pass, so I'm
surprised it would still try to run the test despite the added
/* { dg-require-effective-target sqrt_insn } */ directive.
> The dump files and assembly file show no obvious clues to me as
> to what is supposed to happen; attached.
cdce3 is supposed to shrink-wrap the sqrtf(x) call into something like
(x >= 0 ? .SQRT(x) : sqrtf(x)), where .SQRT stands for a square root
instruction.
Since we don't know why it still runs for you, I'm keeping the mmix
explicit skip in the new version of the patch.
Thanks,
--
Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer
More tolerance and less prejudice are key for inclusion and diversity
Excluding neuro-others for not behaving ""normal"" is *not* inclusive
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-22 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-10 5:30 Alexandre Oliva
2021-03-10 17:11 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2021-03-11 16:04 ` Alexandre Oliva
2024-04-22 9:50 ` Alexandre Oliva [this message]
2024-04-23 15:38 ` Hans-Peter Nilsson
2024-04-28 7:40 ` Alexandre Oliva
2021-03-20 15:20 ` Jeff Law
2024-04-22 9:56 ` [PATCH v2] [testsuite] require sqrt_insn effective target where needed Alexandre Oliva
2024-04-23 8:59 ` Kewen.Lin
2024-04-23 9:14 ` Iain Sandoe
2024-04-28 7:37 ` Alexandre Oliva
2024-04-24 2:15 ` Mike Stump
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=orsezdn2ti.fsf@lxoliva.fsfla.org \
--to=oliva@adacore.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=hp@bitrange.com \
--cc=mikestump@comcast.net \
--cc=ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).