public inbox for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
To: Vineet Gupta <vineetg@rivosinc.com>
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>,
	Jim Wilson <jim.wilson.gcc@gmail.com>,
	philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu, christoph.muellner@vrull.eu,
	collison@rivosinc.com, gnu-toolchain@rivosinc.com,
	Vineet Gupta <vineetg@rivosinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] RISC-V: remove CM_PIC as it doesn't do much
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 07:57:39 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <mhng-74ad288d-c4ac-46d1-905a-fe1f83752c7a@palmer-mbp2014> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220830174830.224541-3-vineetg@rivosinc.com>

On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 10:48:30 PDT (-0700), Vineet Gupta wrote:
> CM_PIC is no longer doing anything directly. Removing it might
> potentially affect USE_LOAD_ADDRESS_MACRO() but seems unlikely.

At least in the short term, there's kind of a mess here that needs to 
get sorted out but just removing CM_PIC doesn't really get us there.

> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vineetg@rivosinc.com>
> ---
>  gcc/config/riscv/riscv-c.cc   | 4 ----
>  gcc/config/riscv/riscv-opts.h | 3 +--
>  gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc     | 2 +-
>  3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-c.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-c.cc
> index bba72cf77a82..7064fcf142fe 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-c.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-c.cc
> @@ -92,13 +92,9 @@ riscv_cpu_cpp_builtins (cpp_reader *pfile)
>        builtin_define ("__riscv_cmodel_medlow");
>        break;
>
> -    case CM_PIC:
> -      /* FALLTHROUGH. */
> -
>      case CM_MEDANY:
>        builtin_define ("__riscv_cmodel_medany");
>        break;
> -
>      }
>
>    if (TARGET_MIN_VLEN != 0)
> diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-opts.h b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-opts.h
> index 85e869e62e3a..ce3237beca7a 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-opts.h
> +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-opts.h
> @@ -34,8 +34,7 @@ extern enum riscv_abi_type riscv_abi;
>
>  enum riscv_code_model {
>    CM_MEDLOW,
> -  CM_MEDANY,
> -  CM_PIC
> +  CM_MEDANY
>  };
>  extern enum riscv_code_model riscv_cmodel;
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
> index 7c120eaa8e33..a239fe43047c 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
> +++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv.cc
> @@ -5162,7 +5162,7 @@ riscv_option_override (void)
>    init_machine_status = &riscv_init_machine_status;
>
>    if (flag_pic)
> -    riscv_cmodel = CM_PIC;
> +    riscv_cmodel = CM_MEDANY;
>
>    /* We get better code with explicit relocs for CM_MEDLOW, but
>       worse code for the others (for now).  Pick the best default.  */

I'm fine either way on this one: having CM_PIC gone makes it a bit more 
likely to confuse CM_MEDANY with PIC, but flag_pic is overriding 
riscv_cmodel anyway so this isn't really used and deleting code is 
always a plus.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-31 14:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-30 17:48 [PATCH 0/2] PIC cleanup Vineet Gupta
2022-08-30 17:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] RISC-V: remove deprecate pic code model macro Vineet Gupta
2022-08-31 14:57   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2022-08-31 15:35     ` Kito Cheng
2022-09-02 20:33       ` [PATCH v2] " Vineet Gupta
2022-09-02 21:03         ` Andreas Schwab
2022-09-02 21:05           ` [PATCH v3] " Vineet Gupta
2022-09-23 18:07             ` Vineet Gupta
2022-10-05  2:24               ` Kito Cheng
2022-10-05  3:33                 ` Vineet Gupta
2022-08-31 20:36     ` [PATCH 1/2] " Vineet Gupta
2022-08-30 17:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] RISC-V: remove CM_PIC as it doesn't do much Vineet Gupta
2022-08-31 14:57   ` Palmer Dabbelt [this message]
2022-08-31 20:39     ` Vineet Gupta
2022-09-02 20:38       ` Vineet Gupta
2022-09-02 23:08         ` [PATCH] RISC-V: make USE_LOAD_ADDRESS_MACRO easier to understand Vineet Gupta
2022-09-23 16:01           ` Kito Cheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=mhng-74ad288d-c4ac-46d1-905a-fe1f83752c7a@palmer-mbp2014 \
    --to=palmer@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=christoph.muellner@vrull.eu \
    --cc=collison@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gnu-toolchain@rivosinc.com \
    --cc=jim.wilson.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
    --cc=philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu \
    --cc=vineetg@rivosinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).