From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
To: Tamar Christina via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
Tamar Christina <Tamar.Christina@arm.com>,
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>,
Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>,
Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>, "MacLeod\,
Andrew" <amacleod@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2]middle-end: Add new tbranch optab to add support for bit-test-and-branch operations
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 13:14:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mpt8rjmf0vj.fsf@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mptedtef4bb.fsf@arm.com> (Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches's message of "Mon, 05 Dec 2022 12:00:40 +0000")
Richard Sandiford via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> Tamar Christina via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
>>> > +/* Check to see if the supplied comparison in PTEST can be performed as a
>>> > + bit-test-and-branch instead. VAL must contain the original tree
>>> > + expression of the non-zero operand which will be used to rewrite the
>>> > + comparison in PTEST.
>>> > +
>>> > + Returns TRUE if operation succeeds and returns updated PMODE and
>>> PTEST,
>>> > + else FALSE. */
>>> > +
>>> > +enum insn_code
>>> > +static validate_test_and_branch (tree val, rtx *ptest, machine_mode
>>> > +*pmode) {
>>> > + if (!val || TREE_CODE (val) != SSA_NAME)
>>> > + return CODE_FOR_nothing;
>>> > +
>>> > + machine_mode mode = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (val)); rtx test =
>>> > + *ptest;
>>> > +
>>> > + if (GET_CODE (test) != EQ && GET_CODE (test) != NE)
>>> > + return CODE_FOR_nothing;
>>> > +
>>> > + /* If the target supports the testbit comparison directly, great.
>>> > + */ auto icode = direct_optab_handler (tbranch_optab, mode); if
>>> > + (icode == CODE_FOR_nothing)
>>> > + return icode;
>>> > +
>>> > + if (tree_zero_one_valued_p (val))
>>> > + {
>>> > + auto pos = BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN ? GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode) - 1 : 0;
>>>
>>> Does this work for BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN && !WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN and mode
>>> > word_mode?
>>>
>>
>> It does now. In this particular case all that matters is the bit ordering, so I've changed
>> It to BITS_BIG_ENDIAN.
>>
>> Also during the review of the AArch64 optab Richard Sandiford wanted me to split the
>> optabs apart into two. The reason is that a match_operator still gets the full RTL.
>>
>> In the case of a tbranch the full RTL has an invalid comparison, so if a target doesn't implement
>> the hook correctly this would lead to incorrect code. We've now moved the operator as part of
>> the name itself to avoid this.
>>
>> Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues.
>>
>> Ok for master?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tamar
>>
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * dojump.cc (do_jump): Pass along value.
>> (do_jump_by_parts_greater_rtx): Likewise.
>> (do_jump_by_parts_zero_rtx): Likewise.
>> (do_jump_by_parts_equality_rtx): Likewise.
>> (do_compare_rtx_and_jump): Likewise.
>> (do_compare_and_jump): Likewise.
>> * dojump.h (do_compare_rtx_and_jump): New.
>> * optabs.cc (emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1): Refactor to take optab to check.
>> (validate_test_and_branch): New.
>> (emit_cmp_and_jump_insns): Optiobally take a value, and when value is
>> supplied then check if it's suitable for tbranch.
>> * optabs.def (tbranch_eq$a4, tbranch_ne$a4): New.
>> * doc/md.texi (tbranch_@var{op}@var{mode}4): Document it.
>> * optabs.h (emit_cmp_and_jump_insns):
>> * tree.h (tree_zero_one_valued_p): New.
>
> Thanks for doing this.
>
>> --- inline copy of patch ---
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/doc/md.texi b/gcc/doc/md.texi
>> index d0a71ecbb806de3a6564c6ffe973fec5da5c597b..c6c4b13d756de28078a0a779876a00c614246914 100644
>> --- a/gcc/doc/md.texi
>> +++ b/gcc/doc/md.texi
>> @@ -6964,6 +6964,14 @@ case, you can and should make operand 1's predicate reject some operators
>> in the @samp{cstore@var{mode}4} pattern, or remove the pattern altogether
>> from the machine description.
>>
>> +@cindex @code{tbranch_@var{op}@var{mode}4} instruction pattern
>> +@item @samp{tbranch_@var{op}@var{mode}4}
>> +Conditional branch instruction combined with a bit test-and-compare
>> +instruction. Operand 0 is a comparison operator. Operand 1 is the
>> +operand of the comparison. Operand 2 is the bit position of Operand 1 to test.
>> +Operand 3 is the @code{code_label} to jump to. @var{op} is one of @var{eq} or
>> +@var{ne}.
>> +
>
> The documentation still describes the old interface. Also, there are only 3
> operands now, rather than 4, so the optab name should end with 3.
>
>> @cindex @code{cbranch@var{mode}4} instruction pattern
>> @item @samp{cbranch@var{mode}4}
>> Conditional branch instruction combined with a compare instruction.
>> diff --git a/gcc/dojump.h b/gcc/dojump.h
>> index e379cceb34bb1765cb575636e4c05b61501fc2cf..d1d79c490c420a805fe48d58740a79c1f25fb839 100644
>> --- a/gcc/dojump.h
>> +++ b/gcc/dojump.h
>> @@ -71,6 +71,10 @@ extern void jumpifnot (tree exp, rtx_code_label *label,
>> extern void jumpifnot_1 (enum tree_code, tree, tree, rtx_code_label *,
>> profile_probability);
>>
>> +extern void do_compare_rtx_and_jump (rtx, rtx, enum rtx_code, int, tree,
>> + machine_mode, rtx, rtx_code_label *,
>> + rtx_code_label *, profile_probability);
>> +
>> extern void do_compare_rtx_and_jump (rtx, rtx, enum rtx_code, int,
>> machine_mode, rtx, rtx_code_label *,
>> rtx_code_label *, profile_probability);
>> diff --git a/gcc/dojump.cc b/gcc/dojump.cc
>> index 2af0cd1aca3b6af13d5d8799094ee93f18022296..190324f36f1a31990f8c49bc8c0f45c23da5c31e 100644
>> --- a/gcc/dojump.cc
>> +++ b/gcc/dojump.cc
>> @@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ do_jump (tree exp, rtx_code_label *if_false_label,
>> }
>> do_compare_rtx_and_jump (temp, CONST0_RTX (GET_MODE (temp)),
>> NE, TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (exp)),
>> - GET_MODE (temp), NULL_RTX,
>> + exp, GET_MODE (temp), NULL_RTX,
>> if_false_label, if_true_label, prob);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ do_jump_by_parts_greater_rtx (scalar_int_mode mode, int unsignedp, rtx op0,
>>
>> /* All but high-order word must be compared as unsigned. */
>> do_compare_rtx_and_jump (op0_word, op1_word, code, (unsignedp || i > 0),
>> - word_mode, NULL_RTX, NULL, if_true_label,
>> + NULL, word_mode, NULL_RTX, NULL, if_true_label,
>> prob);
>>
>> /* Emit only one comparison for 0. Do not emit the last cond jump. */
>> @@ -695,8 +695,8 @@ do_jump_by_parts_greater_rtx (scalar_int_mode mode, int unsignedp, rtx op0,
>> break;
>>
>> /* Consider lower words only if these are equal. */
>> - do_compare_rtx_and_jump (op0_word, op1_word, NE, unsignedp, word_mode,
>> - NULL_RTX, NULL, if_false_label,
>> + do_compare_rtx_and_jump (op0_word, op1_word, NE, unsignedp, NULL,
>> + word_mode, NULL_RTX, NULL, if_false_label,
>> prob.invert ());
>> }
>>
>> @@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ do_jump_by_parts_zero_rtx (scalar_int_mode mode, rtx op0,
>>
>> if (part != 0)
>> {
>> - do_compare_rtx_and_jump (part, const0_rtx, EQ, 1, word_mode,
>> + do_compare_rtx_and_jump (part, const0_rtx, EQ, 1, NULL, word_mode,
>> NULL_RTX, if_false_label, if_true_label, prob);
>> return;
>> }
>> @@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ do_jump_by_parts_zero_rtx (scalar_int_mode mode, rtx op0,
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < nwords; i++)
>> do_compare_rtx_and_jump (operand_subword_force (op0, i, mode),
>> - const0_rtx, EQ, 1, word_mode, NULL_RTX,
>> + const0_rtx, EQ, 1, NULL, word_mode, NULL_RTX,
>> if_false_label, NULL, prob);
>>
>> if (if_true_label)
>> @@ -809,8 +809,8 @@ do_jump_by_parts_equality_rtx (scalar_int_mode mode, rtx op0, rtx op1,
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < nwords; i++)
>> do_compare_rtx_and_jump (operand_subword_force (op0, i, mode),
>> - operand_subword_force (op1, i, mode),
>> - EQ, 0, word_mode, NULL_RTX,
>> + operand_subword_force (op1, i, mode),
>> + EQ, 0, NULL, word_mode, NULL_RTX,
>> if_false_label, NULL, prob);
>>
>> if (if_true_label)
>> @@ -962,6 +962,23 @@ do_compare_rtx_and_jump (rtx op0, rtx op1, enum rtx_code code, int unsignedp,
>> rtx_code_label *if_false_label,
>> rtx_code_label *if_true_label,
>> profile_probability prob)
>> +{
>> + do_compare_rtx_and_jump (op0, op1, code, unsignedp, NULL, mode, size,
>> + if_false_label, if_true_label, prob);
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Like do_compare_and_jump but expects the values to compare as two rtx's.
>> + The decision as to signed or unsigned comparison must be made by the caller.
>> +
>> + If MODE is BLKmode, SIZE is an RTX giving the size of the objects being
>> + compared. */
>> +
>> +void
>> +do_compare_rtx_and_jump (rtx op0, rtx op1, enum rtx_code code, int unsignedp,
>> + tree val, machine_mode mode, rtx size,
>> + rtx_code_label *if_false_label,
>> + rtx_code_label *if_true_label,
>> + profile_probability prob)
>> {
>> rtx tem;
>> rtx_code_label *dummy_label = NULL;
>> @@ -1177,8 +1194,10 @@ do_compare_rtx_and_jump (rtx op0, rtx op1, enum rtx_code code, int unsignedp,
>> }
>> else
>> dest_label = if_false_label;
>> - do_compare_rtx_and_jump (op0, op1, first_code, unsignedp, mode,
>> - size, dest_label, NULL, first_prob);
>> +
>> + do_compare_rtx_and_jump (op0, op1, first_code, unsignedp,
>> + val, mode, size, dest_label, NULL,
>> + first_prob);
>> }
>> /* For !and_them we want to split:
>> if (x) goto t; // prob;
>> @@ -1192,8 +1211,9 @@ do_compare_rtx_and_jump (rtx op0, rtx op1, enum rtx_code code, int unsignedp,
>> else
>> {
>> profile_probability first_prob = prob.split (cprob);
>> - do_compare_rtx_and_jump (op0, op1, first_code, unsignedp, mode,
>> - size, NULL, if_true_label, first_prob);
>> + do_compare_rtx_and_jump (op0, op1, first_code, unsignedp,
>> + val, mode, size, NULL,
>> + if_true_label, first_prob);
>> if (orig_code == NE && can_compare_p (UNEQ, mode, ccp_jump))
>> {
>> /* x != y can be split into x unord y || x ltgt y
>> @@ -1215,7 +1235,7 @@ do_compare_rtx_and_jump (rtx op0, rtx op1, enum rtx_code code, int unsignedp,
>> }
>> }
>>
>> - emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (op0, op1, code, size, mode, unsignedp,
>> + emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (op0, op1, code, size, mode, unsignedp, val,
>> if_true_label, prob);
>> }
>>
>> @@ -1289,9 +1309,9 @@ do_compare_and_jump (tree treeop0, tree treeop1, enum rtx_code signed_code,
>> op1 = new_op1;
>> }
>>
>> - do_compare_rtx_and_jump (op0, op1, code, unsignedp, mode,
>> - ((mode == BLKmode)
>> - ? expr_size (treeop0) : NULL_RTX),
>> + do_compare_rtx_and_jump (op0, op1, code, unsignedp, treeop0, mode,
>> + ((mode == BLKmode)
>> + ? expr_size (treeop0) : NULL_RTX),
>> if_false_label, if_true_label, prob);
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/optabs.cc b/gcc/optabs.cc
>> index 31b15fd3df5fa88119867a23d2abbed139a05115..303b4fd2def9278ddbc3d586103ac8274e73a982 100644
>> --- a/gcc/optabs.cc
>> +++ b/gcc/optabs.cc
>> @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
>> #include "libfuncs.h"
>> #include "internal-fn.h"
>> #include "langhooks.h"
>> +#include "gimple.h"
>> +#include "ssa.h"
>>
>> static void prepare_float_lib_cmp (rtx, rtx, enum rtx_code, rtx *,
>> machine_mode *);
>> @@ -4623,7 +4625,8 @@ prepare_operand (enum insn_code icode, rtx x, int opnum, machine_mode mode,
>>
>> static void
>> emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1 (rtx test, machine_mode mode, rtx label,
>> - profile_probability prob)
>> + direct_optab cmp_optab, profile_probability prob,
>> + bool test_branch)
>> {
>> machine_mode optab_mode;
>> enum mode_class mclass;
>> @@ -4632,12 +4635,17 @@ emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1 (rtx test, machine_mode mode, rtx label,
>>
>> mclass = GET_MODE_CLASS (mode);
>> optab_mode = (mclass == MODE_CC) ? CCmode : mode;
>> - icode = optab_handler (cbranch_optab, optab_mode);
>> + icode = optab_handler (cmp_optab, optab_mode);
>>
>> gcc_assert (icode != CODE_FOR_nothing);
>> - gcc_assert (insn_operand_matches (icode, 0, test));
>> - insn = emit_jump_insn (GEN_FCN (icode) (test, XEXP (test, 0),
>> - XEXP (test, 1), label));
>> + gcc_assert (test_branch || insn_operand_matches (icode, 0, test));
>> + if (test_branch)
>> + insn = emit_jump_insn (GEN_FCN (icode) (XEXP (test, 0),
>> + XEXP (test, 1), label));
>> + else
>> + insn = emit_jump_insn (GEN_FCN (icode) (test, XEXP (test, 0),
>> + XEXP (test, 1), label));
>> +
>> if (prob.initialized_p ()
>> && profile_status_for_fn (cfun) != PROFILE_ABSENT
>> && insn
>> @@ -4647,6 +4655,63 @@ emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1 (rtx test, machine_mode mode, rtx label,
>> add_reg_br_prob_note (insn, prob);
>> }
>>
>> +/* Check to see if the supplied comparison in PTEST can be performed as a
>> + bit-test-and-branch instead. VAL must contain the original tree
>> + expression of the non-zero operand which will be used to rewrite the
>> + comparison in PTEST.
>> +
>> + Returns TRUE if operation succeeds and returns updated PMODE and PTEST,
>> + else FALSE. */
>
> The function now returns an icode rather than true/false. I think it'd
> also be good to clarify what *PTEST means for the tbranch case. How about:
>
> /* PTEST points to a comparison that compares its first operand with zero.
> Check to see if it can be performed as a bit-test-and-branch instead.
> On success, return the instruction that performs the bit-and-test-and-branch
(bit-test-and-branch)
> and replace the second operand of *PTEST with the bit number to test.
> On failure, return CODE_FOR_nothing and leave *PTEST unchanged.
>
> Note that the comparison described by *PTEST should not be taken
> literally after a successful return. *PTEST is just a convenient
> place to store the two operands of the bit-and-test.
>
> VAL must contain the original tree expression for the first operand
> of *PTEST. */
>
> Looks good to me otherwise.
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
>
>> +static enum insn_code
>> +validate_test_and_branch (tree val, rtx *ptest, machine_mode *pmode, optab *res)
>> +{
>> + if (!val || TREE_CODE (val) != SSA_NAME)
>> + return CODE_FOR_nothing;
>> +
>> + machine_mode mode = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (val));
>> + rtx test = *ptest;
>> + direct_optab optab;
>> +
>> + if (GET_CODE (test) == EQ)
>> + optab = tbranch_eq_optab;
>> + else if (GET_CODE (test) == NE)
>> + optab = tbranch_ne_optab;
>> + else
>> + return CODE_FOR_nothing;
>> +
>> + *res = optab;
>> +
>> + /* If the target supports the testbit comparison directly, great. */
>> + auto icode = direct_optab_handler (optab, mode);
>> + if (icode == CODE_FOR_nothing)
>> + return icode;
>> +
>> + if (tree_zero_one_valued_p (val))
>> + {
>> + auto pos = BITS_BIG_ENDIAN ? GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode) - 1 : 0;
>> + XEXP (test, 1) = gen_int_mode (pos, mode);
>> + *ptest = test;
>> + *pmode = mode;
>> + return icode;
>> + }
>> +
>> + wide_int wcst = get_nonzero_bits (val);
>> + if (wcst == -1)
>> + return CODE_FOR_nothing;
>> +
>> + int bitpos;
>> +
>> + if ((bitpos = wi::exact_log2 (wcst)) == -1)
>> + return CODE_FOR_nothing;
>> +
>> + auto pos = BITS_BIG_ENDIAN ? GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode) - 1 - bitpos : bitpos;
>> + XEXP (test, 1) = gen_int_mode (pos, mode);
>> + *ptest = test;
>> + *pmode = mode;
>> + return icode;
>> +}
>> +
>> /* Generate code to compare X with Y so that the condition codes are
>> set and to jump to LABEL if the condition is true. If X is a
>> constant and Y is not a constant, then the comparison is swapped to
>> @@ -4664,11 +4729,13 @@ emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1 (rtx test, machine_mode mode, rtx label,
>> It will be potentially converted into an unsigned variant based on
>> UNSIGNEDP to select a proper jump instruction.
>>
>> - PROB is the probability of jumping to LABEL. */
>> + PROB is the probability of jumping to LABEL. If the comparison is against
>> + zero then VAL contains the expression from which the non-zero RTL is
>> + derived. */
>>
>> void
>> emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (rtx x, rtx y, enum rtx_code comparison, rtx size,
>> - machine_mode mode, int unsignedp, rtx label,
>> + machine_mode mode, int unsignedp, tree val, rtx label,
>> profile_probability prob)
>> {
>> rtx op0 = x, op1 = y;
>> @@ -4693,10 +4760,34 @@ emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (rtx x, rtx y, enum rtx_code comparison, rtx size,
>>
>> prepare_cmp_insn (op0, op1, comparison, size, unsignedp, OPTAB_LIB_WIDEN,
>> &test, &mode);
>> - emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1 (test, mode, label, prob);
>> +
>> + /* Check if we're comparing a truth type with 0, and if so check if
>> + the target supports tbranch. */
>> + machine_mode tmode = mode;
>> + direct_optab optab;
>> + if (op1 == CONST0_RTX (GET_MODE (op1))
>> + && validate_test_and_branch (val, &test, &tmode,
>> + &optab) != CODE_FOR_nothing)
>> + {
>> + emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1 (test, tmode, label, optab, prob, true);
>> + return;
>> + }
>> +
>> + emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1 (test, mode, label, cbranch_optab, prob, false);
>> }
>>
>> -
>>
>> +/* Overloaded version of emit_cmp_and_jump_insns in which VAL is unknown. */
>> +
>> +void
>> +emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (rtx x, rtx y, enum rtx_code comparison, rtx size,
>> + machine_mode mode, int unsignedp, rtx label,
>> + profile_probability prob)
>> +{
>> + emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (x, y, comparison, size, mode, unsignedp, NULL,
>> + label, prob);
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> /* Emit a library call comparison between floating point X and Y.
>> COMPARISON is the rtl operator to compare with (EQ, NE, GT, etc.). */
>>
>> diff --git a/gcc/optabs.def b/gcc/optabs.def
>> index a6db2342bed6baf13ecbd84112c8432c6972e6fe..3199b05e90d6b9b9c6fb3c0353db3db02321e964 100644
>> --- a/gcc/optabs.def
>> +++ b/gcc/optabs.def
>> @@ -220,6 +220,8 @@ OPTAB_D (reload_in_optab, "reload_in$a")
>> OPTAB_D (reload_out_optab, "reload_out$a")
>>
>> OPTAB_DC(cbranch_optab, "cbranch$a4", COMPARE)
>> +OPTAB_D (tbranch_eq_optab, "tbranch_eq$a4")
>> +OPTAB_D (tbranch_ne_optab, "tbranch_ne$a4")
>> OPTAB_D (addcc_optab, "add$acc")
>> OPTAB_D (negcc_optab, "neg$acc")
>> OPTAB_D (notcc_optab, "not$acc")
>> diff --git a/gcc/optabs.h b/gcc/optabs.h
>> index cfd7c742d2d21b0539f5227c22a94f32c793d6f7..cd55604bc3d452d7e28c5530bb4793d481766f4f 100644
>> --- a/gcc/optabs.h
>> +++ b/gcc/optabs.h
>> @@ -268,6 +268,10 @@ extern void emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (rtx, rtx, enum rtx_code, rtx,
>> machine_mode, int, rtx,
>> profile_probability prob
>> = profile_probability::uninitialized ());
>> +extern void emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (rtx, rtx, enum rtx_code, rtx,
>> + machine_mode, int, tree, rtx,
>> + profile_probability prob
>> + = profile_probability::uninitialized ());
>>
>> /* Generate code to indirectly jump to a location given in the rtx LOC. */
>> extern void emit_indirect_jump (rtx);
>> diff --git a/gcc/tree.h b/gcc/tree.h
>> index a863d2e50e5ecafa3f5da4dda98d9637261d07a9..abedaa80a3983ebb6f9ac733b2eaa8d039688f0a 100644
>> --- a/gcc/tree.h
>> +++ b/gcc/tree.h
>> @@ -4726,6 +4726,7 @@ extern tree signed_or_unsigned_type_for (int, tree);
>> extern tree signed_type_for (tree);
>> extern tree unsigned_type_for (tree);
>> extern bool is_truth_type_for (tree, tree);
>> +extern bool tree_zero_one_valued_p (tree);
>> extern tree truth_type_for (tree);
>> extern tree build_pointer_type_for_mode (tree, machine_mode, bool);
>> extern tree build_pointer_type (tree);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-05 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-31 11:53 Tamar Christina
2022-10-31 11:53 ` [PATCH 2/2]AArch64 Support new tbranch optab Tamar Christina
2022-11-14 15:58 ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-15 10:36 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-11-15 10:42 ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-15 10:50 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-11-15 11:00 ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-15 11:14 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-11-15 11:23 ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-15 11:33 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-11-15 11:39 ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-22 13:48 ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-22 14:00 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-11-24 12:18 ` Tamar Christina
2022-12-01 16:44 ` Tamar Christina
2022-12-05 14:06 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-10-31 11:54 ` [PATCH]AArch64 Extend umov and sbfx patterns Tamar Christina
2022-10-31 12:26 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-11-11 14:42 ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-15 11:10 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-10-31 21:16 ` [PATCH 1/2]middle-end: Add new tbranch optab to add support for bit-test-and-branch operations Jeff Law
2022-11-01 15:53 ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-01 17:00 ` Jeff Law
2022-11-02 9:55 ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-02 11:08 ` Aldy Hernandez
2022-11-05 14:23 ` Richard Biener
2022-11-14 15:56 ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-14 16:22 ` Jeff Law
2022-11-15 7:33 ` Richard Biener
2022-12-01 16:29 ` Tamar Christina
2022-12-02 7:09 ` Richard Biener
2022-12-05 12:00 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-12-05 13:14 ` Richard Sandiford [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mpt8rjmf0vj.fsf@arm.com \
--to=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
--cc=Tamar.Christina@arm.com \
--cc=aldyh@redhat.com \
--cc=amacleod@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).