From: Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>
To: Tamar Christina via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: Richard Biener <richard.guenther@gmail.com>,
Tamar Christina <Tamar.Christina@arm.com>,
Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>,
Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>,
Jeff Law <jeffreyalaw@gmail.com>, nd <nd@arm.com>, "MacLeod\,
Andrew" <amacleod@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2]middle-end: Add new tbranch optab to add support for bit-test-and-branch operations
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2022 12:00:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <mptedtef4bb.fsf@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR08MB53251096878BC25E10274FBAFF149@VI1PR08MB5325.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (Tamar Christina via Gcc-patches's message of "Thu, 1 Dec 2022 16:29:49 +0000")
Tamar Christina via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
>> > +/* Check to see if the supplied comparison in PTEST can be performed as a
>> > + bit-test-and-branch instead. VAL must contain the original tree
>> > + expression of the non-zero operand which will be used to rewrite the
>> > + comparison in PTEST.
>> > +
>> > + Returns TRUE if operation succeeds and returns updated PMODE and
>> PTEST,
>> > + else FALSE. */
>> > +
>> > +enum insn_code
>> > +static validate_test_and_branch (tree val, rtx *ptest, machine_mode
>> > +*pmode) {
>> > + if (!val || TREE_CODE (val) != SSA_NAME)
>> > + return CODE_FOR_nothing;
>> > +
>> > + machine_mode mode = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (val)); rtx test =
>> > + *ptest;
>> > +
>> > + if (GET_CODE (test) != EQ && GET_CODE (test) != NE)
>> > + return CODE_FOR_nothing;
>> > +
>> > + /* If the target supports the testbit comparison directly, great.
>> > + */ auto icode = direct_optab_handler (tbranch_optab, mode); if
>> > + (icode == CODE_FOR_nothing)
>> > + return icode;
>> > +
>> > + if (tree_zero_one_valued_p (val))
>> > + {
>> > + auto pos = BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN ? GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode) - 1 : 0;
>>
>> Does this work for BYTES_BIG_ENDIAN && !WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN and mode
>> > word_mode?
>>
>
> It does now. In this particular case all that matters is the bit ordering, so I've changed
> It to BITS_BIG_ENDIAN.
>
> Also during the review of the AArch64 optab Richard Sandiford wanted me to split the
> optabs apart into two. The reason is that a match_operator still gets the full RTL.
>
> In the case of a tbranch the full RTL has an invalid comparison, so if a target doesn't implement
> the hook correctly this would lead to incorrect code. We've now moved the operator as part of
> the name itself to avoid this.
>
> Bootstrapped Regtested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues.
>
> Ok for master?
>
> Thanks,
> Tamar
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * dojump.cc (do_jump): Pass along value.
> (do_jump_by_parts_greater_rtx): Likewise.
> (do_jump_by_parts_zero_rtx): Likewise.
> (do_jump_by_parts_equality_rtx): Likewise.
> (do_compare_rtx_and_jump): Likewise.
> (do_compare_and_jump): Likewise.
> * dojump.h (do_compare_rtx_and_jump): New.
> * optabs.cc (emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1): Refactor to take optab to check.
> (validate_test_and_branch): New.
> (emit_cmp_and_jump_insns): Optiobally take a value, and when value is
> supplied then check if it's suitable for tbranch.
> * optabs.def (tbranch_eq$a4, tbranch_ne$a4): New.
> * doc/md.texi (tbranch_@var{op}@var{mode}4): Document it.
> * optabs.h (emit_cmp_and_jump_insns):
> * tree.h (tree_zero_one_valued_p): New.
Thanks for doing this.
> --- inline copy of patch ---
>
> diff --git a/gcc/doc/md.texi b/gcc/doc/md.texi
> index d0a71ecbb806de3a6564c6ffe973fec5da5c597b..c6c4b13d756de28078a0a779876a00c614246914 100644
> --- a/gcc/doc/md.texi
> +++ b/gcc/doc/md.texi
> @@ -6964,6 +6964,14 @@ case, you can and should make operand 1's predicate reject some operators
> in the @samp{cstore@var{mode}4} pattern, or remove the pattern altogether
> from the machine description.
>
> +@cindex @code{tbranch_@var{op}@var{mode}4} instruction pattern
> +@item @samp{tbranch_@var{op}@var{mode}4}
> +Conditional branch instruction combined with a bit test-and-compare
> +instruction. Operand 0 is a comparison operator. Operand 1 is the
> +operand of the comparison. Operand 2 is the bit position of Operand 1 to test.
> +Operand 3 is the @code{code_label} to jump to. @var{op} is one of @var{eq} or
> +@var{ne}.
> +
The documentation still describes the old interface. Also, there are only 3
operands now, rather than 4, so the optab name should end with 3.
> @cindex @code{cbranch@var{mode}4} instruction pattern
> @item @samp{cbranch@var{mode}4}
> Conditional branch instruction combined with a compare instruction.
> diff --git a/gcc/dojump.h b/gcc/dojump.h
> index e379cceb34bb1765cb575636e4c05b61501fc2cf..d1d79c490c420a805fe48d58740a79c1f25fb839 100644
> --- a/gcc/dojump.h
> +++ b/gcc/dojump.h
> @@ -71,6 +71,10 @@ extern void jumpifnot (tree exp, rtx_code_label *label,
> extern void jumpifnot_1 (enum tree_code, tree, tree, rtx_code_label *,
> profile_probability);
>
> +extern void do_compare_rtx_and_jump (rtx, rtx, enum rtx_code, int, tree,
> + machine_mode, rtx, rtx_code_label *,
> + rtx_code_label *, profile_probability);
> +
> extern void do_compare_rtx_and_jump (rtx, rtx, enum rtx_code, int,
> machine_mode, rtx, rtx_code_label *,
> rtx_code_label *, profile_probability);
> diff --git a/gcc/dojump.cc b/gcc/dojump.cc
> index 2af0cd1aca3b6af13d5d8799094ee93f18022296..190324f36f1a31990f8c49bc8c0f45c23da5c31e 100644
> --- a/gcc/dojump.cc
> +++ b/gcc/dojump.cc
> @@ -619,7 +619,7 @@ do_jump (tree exp, rtx_code_label *if_false_label,
> }
> do_compare_rtx_and_jump (temp, CONST0_RTX (GET_MODE (temp)),
> NE, TYPE_UNSIGNED (TREE_TYPE (exp)),
> - GET_MODE (temp), NULL_RTX,
> + exp, GET_MODE (temp), NULL_RTX,
> if_false_label, if_true_label, prob);
> }
>
> @@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ do_jump_by_parts_greater_rtx (scalar_int_mode mode, int unsignedp, rtx op0,
>
> /* All but high-order word must be compared as unsigned. */
> do_compare_rtx_and_jump (op0_word, op1_word, code, (unsignedp || i > 0),
> - word_mode, NULL_RTX, NULL, if_true_label,
> + NULL, word_mode, NULL_RTX, NULL, if_true_label,
> prob);
>
> /* Emit only one comparison for 0. Do not emit the last cond jump. */
> @@ -695,8 +695,8 @@ do_jump_by_parts_greater_rtx (scalar_int_mode mode, int unsignedp, rtx op0,
> break;
>
> /* Consider lower words only if these are equal. */
> - do_compare_rtx_and_jump (op0_word, op1_word, NE, unsignedp, word_mode,
> - NULL_RTX, NULL, if_false_label,
> + do_compare_rtx_and_jump (op0_word, op1_word, NE, unsignedp, NULL,
> + word_mode, NULL_RTX, NULL, if_false_label,
> prob.invert ());
> }
>
> @@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ do_jump_by_parts_zero_rtx (scalar_int_mode mode, rtx op0,
>
> if (part != 0)
> {
> - do_compare_rtx_and_jump (part, const0_rtx, EQ, 1, word_mode,
> + do_compare_rtx_and_jump (part, const0_rtx, EQ, 1, NULL, word_mode,
> NULL_RTX, if_false_label, if_true_label, prob);
> return;
> }
> @@ -766,7 +766,7 @@ do_jump_by_parts_zero_rtx (scalar_int_mode mode, rtx op0,
>
> for (i = 0; i < nwords; i++)
> do_compare_rtx_and_jump (operand_subword_force (op0, i, mode),
> - const0_rtx, EQ, 1, word_mode, NULL_RTX,
> + const0_rtx, EQ, 1, NULL, word_mode, NULL_RTX,
> if_false_label, NULL, prob);
>
> if (if_true_label)
> @@ -809,8 +809,8 @@ do_jump_by_parts_equality_rtx (scalar_int_mode mode, rtx op0, rtx op1,
>
> for (i = 0; i < nwords; i++)
> do_compare_rtx_and_jump (operand_subword_force (op0, i, mode),
> - operand_subword_force (op1, i, mode),
> - EQ, 0, word_mode, NULL_RTX,
> + operand_subword_force (op1, i, mode),
> + EQ, 0, NULL, word_mode, NULL_RTX,
> if_false_label, NULL, prob);
>
> if (if_true_label)
> @@ -962,6 +962,23 @@ do_compare_rtx_and_jump (rtx op0, rtx op1, enum rtx_code code, int unsignedp,
> rtx_code_label *if_false_label,
> rtx_code_label *if_true_label,
> profile_probability prob)
> +{
> + do_compare_rtx_and_jump (op0, op1, code, unsignedp, NULL, mode, size,
> + if_false_label, if_true_label, prob);
> +}
> +
> +/* Like do_compare_and_jump but expects the values to compare as two rtx's.
> + The decision as to signed or unsigned comparison must be made by the caller.
> +
> + If MODE is BLKmode, SIZE is an RTX giving the size of the objects being
> + compared. */
> +
> +void
> +do_compare_rtx_and_jump (rtx op0, rtx op1, enum rtx_code code, int unsignedp,
> + tree val, machine_mode mode, rtx size,
> + rtx_code_label *if_false_label,
> + rtx_code_label *if_true_label,
> + profile_probability prob)
> {
> rtx tem;
> rtx_code_label *dummy_label = NULL;
> @@ -1177,8 +1194,10 @@ do_compare_rtx_and_jump (rtx op0, rtx op1, enum rtx_code code, int unsignedp,
> }
> else
> dest_label = if_false_label;
> - do_compare_rtx_and_jump (op0, op1, first_code, unsignedp, mode,
> - size, dest_label, NULL, first_prob);
> +
> + do_compare_rtx_and_jump (op0, op1, first_code, unsignedp,
> + val, mode, size, dest_label, NULL,
> + first_prob);
> }
> /* For !and_them we want to split:
> if (x) goto t; // prob;
> @@ -1192,8 +1211,9 @@ do_compare_rtx_and_jump (rtx op0, rtx op1, enum rtx_code code, int unsignedp,
> else
> {
> profile_probability first_prob = prob.split (cprob);
> - do_compare_rtx_and_jump (op0, op1, first_code, unsignedp, mode,
> - size, NULL, if_true_label, first_prob);
> + do_compare_rtx_and_jump (op0, op1, first_code, unsignedp,
> + val, mode, size, NULL,
> + if_true_label, first_prob);
> if (orig_code == NE && can_compare_p (UNEQ, mode, ccp_jump))
> {
> /* x != y can be split into x unord y || x ltgt y
> @@ -1215,7 +1235,7 @@ do_compare_rtx_and_jump (rtx op0, rtx op1, enum rtx_code code, int unsignedp,
> }
> }
>
> - emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (op0, op1, code, size, mode, unsignedp,
> + emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (op0, op1, code, size, mode, unsignedp, val,
> if_true_label, prob);
> }
>
> @@ -1289,9 +1309,9 @@ do_compare_and_jump (tree treeop0, tree treeop1, enum rtx_code signed_code,
> op1 = new_op1;
> }
>
> - do_compare_rtx_and_jump (op0, op1, code, unsignedp, mode,
> - ((mode == BLKmode)
> - ? expr_size (treeop0) : NULL_RTX),
> + do_compare_rtx_and_jump (op0, op1, code, unsignedp, treeop0, mode,
> + ((mode == BLKmode)
> + ? expr_size (treeop0) : NULL_RTX),
> if_false_label, if_true_label, prob);
> }
>
> diff --git a/gcc/optabs.cc b/gcc/optabs.cc
> index 31b15fd3df5fa88119867a23d2abbed139a05115..303b4fd2def9278ddbc3d586103ac8274e73a982 100644
> --- a/gcc/optabs.cc
> +++ b/gcc/optabs.cc
> @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ along with GCC; see the file COPYING3. If not see
> #include "libfuncs.h"
> #include "internal-fn.h"
> #include "langhooks.h"
> +#include "gimple.h"
> +#include "ssa.h"
>
> static void prepare_float_lib_cmp (rtx, rtx, enum rtx_code, rtx *,
> machine_mode *);
> @@ -4623,7 +4625,8 @@ prepare_operand (enum insn_code icode, rtx x, int opnum, machine_mode mode,
>
> static void
> emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1 (rtx test, machine_mode mode, rtx label,
> - profile_probability prob)
> + direct_optab cmp_optab, profile_probability prob,
> + bool test_branch)
> {
> machine_mode optab_mode;
> enum mode_class mclass;
> @@ -4632,12 +4635,17 @@ emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1 (rtx test, machine_mode mode, rtx label,
>
> mclass = GET_MODE_CLASS (mode);
> optab_mode = (mclass == MODE_CC) ? CCmode : mode;
> - icode = optab_handler (cbranch_optab, optab_mode);
> + icode = optab_handler (cmp_optab, optab_mode);
>
> gcc_assert (icode != CODE_FOR_nothing);
> - gcc_assert (insn_operand_matches (icode, 0, test));
> - insn = emit_jump_insn (GEN_FCN (icode) (test, XEXP (test, 0),
> - XEXP (test, 1), label));
> + gcc_assert (test_branch || insn_operand_matches (icode, 0, test));
> + if (test_branch)
> + insn = emit_jump_insn (GEN_FCN (icode) (XEXP (test, 0),
> + XEXP (test, 1), label));
> + else
> + insn = emit_jump_insn (GEN_FCN (icode) (test, XEXP (test, 0),
> + XEXP (test, 1), label));
> +
> if (prob.initialized_p ()
> && profile_status_for_fn (cfun) != PROFILE_ABSENT
> && insn
> @@ -4647,6 +4655,63 @@ emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1 (rtx test, machine_mode mode, rtx label,
> add_reg_br_prob_note (insn, prob);
> }
>
> +/* Check to see if the supplied comparison in PTEST can be performed as a
> + bit-test-and-branch instead. VAL must contain the original tree
> + expression of the non-zero operand which will be used to rewrite the
> + comparison in PTEST.
> +
> + Returns TRUE if operation succeeds and returns updated PMODE and PTEST,
> + else FALSE. */
The function now returns an icode rather than true/false. I think it'd
also be good to clarify what *PTEST means for the tbranch case. How about:
/* PTEST points to a comparison that compares its first operand with zero.
Check to see if it can be performed as a bit-test-and-branch instead.
On success, return the instruction that performs the bit-and-test-and-branch
and replace the second operand of *PTEST with the bit number to test.
On failure, return CODE_FOR_nothing and leave *PTEST unchanged.
Note that the comparison described by *PTEST should not be taken
literally after a successful return. *PTEST is just a convenient
place to store the two operands of the bit-and-test.
VAL must contain the original tree expression for the first operand
of *PTEST. */
Looks good to me otherwise.
Thanks,
Richard
> +static enum insn_code
> +validate_test_and_branch (tree val, rtx *ptest, machine_mode *pmode, optab *res)
> +{
> + if (!val || TREE_CODE (val) != SSA_NAME)
> + return CODE_FOR_nothing;
> +
> + machine_mode mode = TYPE_MODE (TREE_TYPE (val));
> + rtx test = *ptest;
> + direct_optab optab;
> +
> + if (GET_CODE (test) == EQ)
> + optab = tbranch_eq_optab;
> + else if (GET_CODE (test) == NE)
> + optab = tbranch_ne_optab;
> + else
> + return CODE_FOR_nothing;
> +
> + *res = optab;
> +
> + /* If the target supports the testbit comparison directly, great. */
> + auto icode = direct_optab_handler (optab, mode);
> + if (icode == CODE_FOR_nothing)
> + return icode;
> +
> + if (tree_zero_one_valued_p (val))
> + {
> + auto pos = BITS_BIG_ENDIAN ? GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode) - 1 : 0;
> + XEXP (test, 1) = gen_int_mode (pos, mode);
> + *ptest = test;
> + *pmode = mode;
> + return icode;
> + }
> +
> + wide_int wcst = get_nonzero_bits (val);
> + if (wcst == -1)
> + return CODE_FOR_nothing;
> +
> + int bitpos;
> +
> + if ((bitpos = wi::exact_log2 (wcst)) == -1)
> + return CODE_FOR_nothing;
> +
> + auto pos = BITS_BIG_ENDIAN ? GET_MODE_BITSIZE (mode) - 1 - bitpos : bitpos;
> + XEXP (test, 1) = gen_int_mode (pos, mode);
> + *ptest = test;
> + *pmode = mode;
> + return icode;
> +}
> +
> /* Generate code to compare X with Y so that the condition codes are
> set and to jump to LABEL if the condition is true. If X is a
> constant and Y is not a constant, then the comparison is swapped to
> @@ -4664,11 +4729,13 @@ emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1 (rtx test, machine_mode mode, rtx label,
> It will be potentially converted into an unsigned variant based on
> UNSIGNEDP to select a proper jump instruction.
>
> - PROB is the probability of jumping to LABEL. */
> + PROB is the probability of jumping to LABEL. If the comparison is against
> + zero then VAL contains the expression from which the non-zero RTL is
> + derived. */
>
> void
> emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (rtx x, rtx y, enum rtx_code comparison, rtx size,
> - machine_mode mode, int unsignedp, rtx label,
> + machine_mode mode, int unsignedp, tree val, rtx label,
> profile_probability prob)
> {
> rtx op0 = x, op1 = y;
> @@ -4693,10 +4760,34 @@ emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (rtx x, rtx y, enum rtx_code comparison, rtx size,
>
> prepare_cmp_insn (op0, op1, comparison, size, unsignedp, OPTAB_LIB_WIDEN,
> &test, &mode);
> - emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1 (test, mode, label, prob);
> +
> + /* Check if we're comparing a truth type with 0, and if so check if
> + the target supports tbranch. */
> + machine_mode tmode = mode;
> + direct_optab optab;
> + if (op1 == CONST0_RTX (GET_MODE (op1))
> + && validate_test_and_branch (val, &test, &tmode,
> + &optab) != CODE_FOR_nothing)
> + {
> + emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1 (test, tmode, label, optab, prob, true);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + emit_cmp_and_jump_insn_1 (test, mode, label, cbranch_optab, prob, false);
> }
>
> -
>
> +/* Overloaded version of emit_cmp_and_jump_insns in which VAL is unknown. */
> +
> +void
> +emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (rtx x, rtx y, enum rtx_code comparison, rtx size,
> + machine_mode mode, int unsignedp, rtx label,
> + profile_probability prob)
> +{
> + emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (x, y, comparison, size, mode, unsignedp, NULL,
> + label, prob);
> +}
> +
> +
> /* Emit a library call comparison between floating point X and Y.
> COMPARISON is the rtl operator to compare with (EQ, NE, GT, etc.). */
>
> diff --git a/gcc/optabs.def b/gcc/optabs.def
> index a6db2342bed6baf13ecbd84112c8432c6972e6fe..3199b05e90d6b9b9c6fb3c0353db3db02321e964 100644
> --- a/gcc/optabs.def
> +++ b/gcc/optabs.def
> @@ -220,6 +220,8 @@ OPTAB_D (reload_in_optab, "reload_in$a")
> OPTAB_D (reload_out_optab, "reload_out$a")
>
> OPTAB_DC(cbranch_optab, "cbranch$a4", COMPARE)
> +OPTAB_D (tbranch_eq_optab, "tbranch_eq$a4")
> +OPTAB_D (tbranch_ne_optab, "tbranch_ne$a4")
> OPTAB_D (addcc_optab, "add$acc")
> OPTAB_D (negcc_optab, "neg$acc")
> OPTAB_D (notcc_optab, "not$acc")
> diff --git a/gcc/optabs.h b/gcc/optabs.h
> index cfd7c742d2d21b0539f5227c22a94f32c793d6f7..cd55604bc3d452d7e28c5530bb4793d481766f4f 100644
> --- a/gcc/optabs.h
> +++ b/gcc/optabs.h
> @@ -268,6 +268,10 @@ extern void emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (rtx, rtx, enum rtx_code, rtx,
> machine_mode, int, rtx,
> profile_probability prob
> = profile_probability::uninitialized ());
> +extern void emit_cmp_and_jump_insns (rtx, rtx, enum rtx_code, rtx,
> + machine_mode, int, tree, rtx,
> + profile_probability prob
> + = profile_probability::uninitialized ());
>
> /* Generate code to indirectly jump to a location given in the rtx LOC. */
> extern void emit_indirect_jump (rtx);
> diff --git a/gcc/tree.h b/gcc/tree.h
> index a863d2e50e5ecafa3f5da4dda98d9637261d07a9..abedaa80a3983ebb6f9ac733b2eaa8d039688f0a 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree.h
> +++ b/gcc/tree.h
> @@ -4726,6 +4726,7 @@ extern tree signed_or_unsigned_type_for (int, tree);
> extern tree signed_type_for (tree);
> extern tree unsigned_type_for (tree);
> extern bool is_truth_type_for (tree, tree);
> +extern bool tree_zero_one_valued_p (tree);
> extern tree truth_type_for (tree);
> extern tree build_pointer_type_for_mode (tree, machine_mode, bool);
> extern tree build_pointer_type (tree);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-05 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-31 11:53 Tamar Christina
2022-10-31 11:53 ` [PATCH 2/2]AArch64 Support new tbranch optab Tamar Christina
2022-11-14 15:58 ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-15 10:36 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-11-15 10:42 ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-15 10:50 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-11-15 11:00 ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-15 11:14 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-11-15 11:23 ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-15 11:33 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-11-15 11:39 ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-22 13:48 ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-22 14:00 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-11-24 12:18 ` Tamar Christina
2022-12-01 16:44 ` Tamar Christina
2022-12-05 14:06 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-10-31 11:54 ` [PATCH]AArch64 Extend umov and sbfx patterns Tamar Christina
2022-10-31 12:26 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-11-11 14:42 ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-15 11:10 ` Richard Sandiford
2022-10-31 21:16 ` [PATCH 1/2]middle-end: Add new tbranch optab to add support for bit-test-and-branch operations Jeff Law
2022-11-01 15:53 ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-01 17:00 ` Jeff Law
2022-11-02 9:55 ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-02 11:08 ` Aldy Hernandez
2022-11-05 14:23 ` Richard Biener
2022-11-14 15:56 ` Tamar Christina
2022-11-14 16:22 ` Jeff Law
2022-11-15 7:33 ` Richard Biener
2022-12-01 16:29 ` Tamar Christina
2022-12-02 7:09 ` Richard Biener
2022-12-05 12:00 ` Richard Sandiford [this message]
2022-12-05 13:14 ` Richard Sandiford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=mptedtef4bb.fsf@arm.com \
--to=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
--cc=Tamar.Christina@arm.com \
--cc=aldyh@redhat.com \
--cc=amacleod@redhat.com \
--cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=jeffreyalaw@gmail.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=rguenther@suse.de \
--cc=richard.guenther@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).