public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
@ 2001-07-09 12:46 Wolfgang_Messingschlager
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang_Messingschlager @ 2001-07-09 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-gnats; +Cc: W.Mess
>Number: 3627
>Category: bootstrap
>Synopsis: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Mon Jul 09 12:46:01 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Wolfgang Messingschlager
>Release: Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-suse-linux/2.95.2/specs gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)
>Organization:
>Environment:
Pention 350 MHz, Suse Linux Kernel 2.2.16, gcc 2.95.2
>Description:
problem to build static gcc with
# make -e LDFLAGS=-static bootstrap
...
gcc -c -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wtraditional -pedantic -Wno-long-long -I. -I.. -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/.. -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/../config -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/../../include /lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/fixlib.c
gcc -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wtraditional -pedantic -Wno-long-long -I. -I.. -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/.. -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/../config -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/../../include -static -o fixincl fixincl.o fixtests.o fixfixes.o server.o procopen.o gnu-regex.o fixlib.o ../../libiberty/libiberty.a
/usr/lib/libc.a(regex.o): In function `init_syntax_once':
/usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.1/posix/regex.c:257: multiple definition of `re_max_failures'
gnu-regex.o:/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/gnu-regex.c:173: first defined here
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>How-To-Repeat:
# ../gcc-3.0/configure --prefix=/usr \
--with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/g++ \
-enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-nls
# make -e LDFLAGS=-static bootstrap
...
gcc -c -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wtraditional -pedantic -Wno-long-long -I. -I.. -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/.. -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/../config -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/../../include /lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/fixlib.c
gcc -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wtraditional -pedantic -Wno-long-long -I. -I.. -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/.. -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/../config -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/../../include -static -o fixincl fixincl.o fixtests.o fixfixes.o server.o procopen.o gnu-regex.o fixlib.o ../../libiberty/libiberty.a
/usr/lib/libc.a(regex.o): In function `init_syntax_once':
/usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.1/posix/regex.c:257: multiple definition of `re_max_failures'
gnu-regex.o:/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/gnu-regex.c:173: first defined here
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>Fix:
# export CPPFLAGS=-Dre_max_failures=re_max_failures2
# ../gcc-3.0/configure --prefix=/usr \
--with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/g++ \
-enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-nls
# make -e LDFLAGS=-static bootstrap
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
@ 2002-01-01 11:36 Wolfgang Messingschlager
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Messingschlager @ 2002-01-01 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3627; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Wolfgang Messingschlager <w.mess@freenet.de>
To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux
to build gcc-3.0
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 20:06:23 +0100
rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
>
> Synopsis: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> State-Changed-By: rodrigc
> State-Changed-When: Sat Dec 1 21:52:29 2001
> State-Changed-Why:
> If you want to build a static version of gcc, then
> use the --disable-shared flag when you run configure.
> See:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html
>
> Can you tell me if that works for you?
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=3627&database=gcc
Sorry for the delay,
I was in holidays. I have tested to use the --disable-shared flag during
configure.
This has solved my problem.
You can close this "bug"
Wolfgang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
@ 2002-01-01 11:36 Craig Rodrigues
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Craig Rodrigues @ 2002-01-01 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3627; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@mediaone.net>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 14:35:43 -0500
Delivered-To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 20:06:23 +0100
From: Wolfgang Messingschlager <w.mess@freenet.de>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4-4GB i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux
to build gcc-3.0
rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
>
> Synopsis: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> State-Changed-By: rodrigc
> State-Changed-When: Sat Dec 1 21:52:29 2001
> State-Changed-Why:
> If you want to build a static version of gcc, then
> use the --disable-shared flag when you run configure.
> See:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html
>
> Can you tell me if that works for you?
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=3627&database=gcc
Sorry for the delay,
I was in holidays. I have tested to use the --disable-shared flag during
configure.
This has solved my problem.
You can close this "bug"
Wolfgang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
@ 2001-12-26 19:37 rodrigc
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rodrigc @ 2001-12-26 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: W.Mess, Wolfgang_Messingschlager, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody
Synopsis: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
State-Changed-By: rodrigc
State-Changed-When: Wed Dec 26 19:37:41 2001
State-Changed-Why:
No feedback.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3627
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
@ 2001-12-01 21:56 rodrigc
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rodrigc @ 2001-12-01 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3627; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
To: W.Mess@freenet.de, Wolfgang_Messingschlager@bmc.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
Date: 2 Dec 2001 05:52:30 -0000
Synopsis: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: rodrigc
State-Changed-When: Sat Dec 1 21:52:29 2001
State-Changed-Why:
If you want to build a static version of gcc, then
use the --disable-shared flag when you run configure.
See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html
Can you tell me if that works for you?
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=3627&database=gcc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
@ 2001-12-01 21:52 rodrigc
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rodrigc @ 2001-12-01 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: W.Mess, Wolfgang_Messingschlager, gcc-bugs, gcc-gnats, gcc-prs, nobody
Synopsis: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: rodrigc
State-Changed-When: Sat Dec 1 21:52:29 2001
State-Changed-Why:
If you want to build a static version of gcc, then
use the --disable-shared flag when you run configure.
See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html
Can you tell me if that works for you?
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=3627&database=gcc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-01-01 19:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-07-09 12:46 bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0 Wolfgang_Messingschlager
2001-12-01 21:52 rodrigc
2001-12-01 21:56 rodrigc
2001-12-26 19:37 rodrigc
2002-01-01 11:36 Craig Rodrigues
2002-01-01 11:36 Wolfgang Messingschlager
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).