public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux  to build gcc-3.0
@ 2002-01-01 11:36 Wolfgang Messingschlager
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Messingschlager @ 2002-01-01 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3627; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Messingschlager <w.mess@freenet.de>
To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux 
 to build gcc-3.0
Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 20:06:23 +0100

 rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
 > 
 > Synopsis: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 > State-Changed-By: rodrigc
 > State-Changed-When: Sat Dec  1 21:52:29 2001
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     If you want to build a static version of gcc, then
 >     use the --disable-shared flag when you run configure.
 >     See:
 >     http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html
 > 
 >     Can you tell me if that works for you?
 > 
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=3627&database=gcc
 
 Sorry for the delay,
 
 
 I was in holidays. I have tested to use the --disable-shared flag during
 configure.
 This has solved my problem.
 
 You can close this "bug"
 
 Wolfgang


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
@ 2002-01-01 11:36 Craig Rodrigues
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Craig Rodrigues @ 2002-01-01 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3627; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@mediaone.net>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 14:35:43 -0500

 Delivered-To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
 Date: Tue, 01 Jan 2002 20:06:23 +0100
 From: Wolfgang Messingschlager <w.mess@freenet.de>
 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [de] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.4-4GB i686)
 X-Accept-Language: en
 To: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
 Subject: bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux 
  to build gcc-3.0
 
 rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
 > 
 > Synopsis: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
 > 
 > State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 > State-Changed-By: rodrigc
 > State-Changed-When: Sat Dec  1 21:52:29 2001
 > State-Changed-Why:
 >     If you want to build a static version of gcc, then
 >     use the --disable-shared flag when you run configure.
 >     See:
 >     http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html
 > 
 >     Can you tell me if that works for you?
 > 
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=3627&database=gcc
 
 Sorry for the delay,
 
 
 I was in holidays. I have tested to use the --disable-shared flag during
 configure.
 This has solved my problem.
 
 You can close this "bug"
 
 Wolfgang


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
@ 2001-12-26 19:37 rodrigc
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rodrigc @ 2001-12-26 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: W.Mess, Wolfgang_Messingschlager, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody

Synopsis: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0

State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
State-Changed-By: rodrigc
State-Changed-When: Wed Dec 26 19:37:41 2001
State-Changed-Why:
    No feedback.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=3627


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
@ 2001-12-01 21:56 rodrigc
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rodrigc @ 2001-12-01 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR bootstrap/3627; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: rodrigc@gcc.gnu.org
To: W.Mess@freenet.de, Wolfgang_Messingschlager@bmc.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
  gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
Date: 2 Dec 2001 05:52:30 -0000

 Synopsis: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
 
 State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
 State-Changed-By: rodrigc
 State-Changed-When: Sat Dec  1 21:52:29 2001
 State-Changed-Why:
     If you want to build a static version of gcc, then
     use the --disable-shared flag when you run configure.
     See:
     http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html
     
     Can you tell me if that works for you?
 
 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=3627&database=gcc


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
@ 2001-12-01 21:52 rodrigc
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: rodrigc @ 2001-12-01 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: W.Mess, Wolfgang_Messingschlager, gcc-bugs, gcc-gnats, gcc-prs, nobody

Synopsis: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0

State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: rodrigc
State-Changed-When: Sat Dec  1 21:52:29 2001
State-Changed-Why:
    If you want to build a static version of gcc, then
    use the --disable-shared flag when you run configure.
    See:
    http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html
    
    Can you tell me if that works for you?

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&pr=3627&database=gcc


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
@ 2001-07-09 12:46 Wolfgang_Messingschlager
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang_Messingschlager @ 2001-07-09 12:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-gnats; +Cc: W.Mess

>Number:         3627
>Category:       bootstrap
>Synopsis:       multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Jul 09 12:46:01 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Wolfgang Messingschlager
>Release:        Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i486-suse-linux/2.95.2/specs gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)
>Organization:
>Environment:
Pention 350 MHz, Suse Linux Kernel 2.2.16, gcc 2.95.2
>Description:
problem to build static gcc with

# make -e LDFLAGS=-static bootstrap
...
gcc -c -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g   -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wtraditional -pedantic -Wno-long-long -I. -I.. -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/.. -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/../config -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/../../include /lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/fixlib.c

gcc -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g   -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wtraditional -pedantic -Wno-long-long -I. -I.. -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/.. -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/../config -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/../../include -static -o fixincl fixincl.o fixtests.o fixfixes.o server.o procopen.o gnu-regex.o fixlib.o ../../libiberty/libiberty.a

/usr/lib/libc.a(regex.o): In function `init_syntax_once':

/usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.1/posix/regex.c:257: multiple definition of `re_max_failures'

gnu-regex.o:/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/gnu-regex.c:173: first defined here

collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>How-To-Repeat:
# ../gcc-3.0/configure --prefix=/usr \

--with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/g++ \
-enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-nls

# make -e LDFLAGS=-static bootstrap
...
gcc -c -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g   -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wtraditional -pedantic -Wno-long-long -I. -I.. -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/.. -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/../config -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/../../include /lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/fixlib.c

gcc -DIN_GCC -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -g   -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wtraditional -pedantic -Wno-long-long -I. -I.. -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/.. -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/../config -I/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/../../include -static -o fixincl fixincl.o fixtests.o fixfixes.o server.o procopen.o gnu-regex.o fixlib.o ../../libiberty/libiberty.a

/usr/lib/libc.a(regex.o): In function `init_syntax_once':

/usr/src/packages/BUILD/glibc-2.1/posix/regex.c:257: multiple definition of `re_max_failures'

gnu-regex.o:/lfs/usr/src/gcc-3.0/gcc/fixinc/gnu-regex.c:173: first defined here

collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
>Fix:
# export CPPFLAGS=-Dre_max_failures=re_max_failures2
# ../gcc-3.0/configure --prefix=/usr \

--with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/include/g++ \
-enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-nls

# make -e LDFLAGS=-static bootstrap
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-01-01 19:36 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-01-01 11:36 bootstrap/3627: multiple definition of `re_max_failures' on i386-Linux to build gcc-3.0 Wolfgang Messingschlager
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-01 11:36 Craig Rodrigues
2001-12-26 19:37 rodrigc
2001-12-01 21:56 rodrigc
2001-12-01 21:52 rodrigc
2001-07-09 12:46 Wolfgang_Messingschlager

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).