public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c/2454: Test Program A0376972.c fails with gcc-20010320, works with gcc-2.95.3
@ 2002-04-04 17:26 Joseph S. Myers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2002-04-04 17:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR c/2454; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
To: <rth@gcc.gnu.org>, <Andreas.Krakowczyk@fujitsu-siemens.com>,
<Erwin.Unruh@fujitsu-siemens.com>, <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
Joseph Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>, <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc:
Subject: Re: c/2454: Test Program A0376972.c fails with gcc-20010320, works
with gcc-2.95.3
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 02:25:25 +0100 (BST)
On 4 Apr 2002 rth@gcc.gnu.org wrote:
> The 20010606-1.c test case doesn't seem to be failing on any
> platform. Does this mean that the optimizer issues referred
> to have been resolved?
The testcase is 20011223-1.c from the date it was committed, not
20010606-1.c.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: c/2454: Test Program A0376972.c fails with gcc-20010320, works with gcc-2.95.3
@ 2002-07-03 10:58 mmitchel
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: mmitchel @ 2002-07-03 10:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas.Krakowczyk, Erwin.Unruh, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, jsm28, nobody
Synopsis: Test Program A0376972.c fails with gcc-20010320, works with gcc-2.95.3
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
State-Changed-By: mmitchel
State-Changed-When: Wed Jul 3 10:58:27 2002
State-Changed-Why:
Looks as fixed as its going to be. If there is a still a
problem (which nobody seems to be sure about one way or
the other), we can open a new PR.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=2454
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: c/2454: Test Program A0376972.c fails with gcc-20010320, works with gcc-2.95.3
@ 2002-04-04 22:56 Joseph S. Myers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2002-04-04 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR c/2454; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Cc: <rth@gcc.gnu.org>, <Andreas.Krakowczyk@fujitsu-siemens.com>,
<Erwin.Unruh@fujitsu-siemens.com>, <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
<gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: c/2454: Test Program A0376972.c fails with gcc-20010320, works
with gcc-2.95.3
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 07:55:27 +0100 (BST)
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 02:25:25AM +0100, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> > The testcase is 20011223-1.c from the date it was committed, not
> > 20010606-1.c.
>
> Ah. Well, I don't see that failing either.
The most recent testresults showing it failing seem to be
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-04/msg00009.html
- I don't know if this means it is now fixed, someone should have noticed
that their patch fixed it if so (if doing proper before-and-after
comparisons to detect regressions), unless it only failed on certain
platforms.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm28@cam.ac.uk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: c/2454: Test Program A0376972.c fails with gcc-20010320, works with gcc-2.95.3
@ 2002-04-04 18:06 Richard Henderson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Henderson @ 2002-04-04 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR c/2454; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: rth@gcc.gnu.org, Andreas.Krakowczyk@fujitsu-siemens.com,
Erwin.Unruh@fujitsu-siemens.com, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: c/2454: Test Program A0376972.c fails with gcc-20010320, works with gcc-2.95.3
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 17:57:09 -0800
On Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 02:25:25AM +0100, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
> The testcase is 20011223-1.c from the date it was committed, not
> 20010606-1.c.
Ah. Well, I don't see that failing either.
r~
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: c/2454: Test Program A0376972.c fails with gcc-20010320, works with gcc-2.95.3
@ 2002-04-04 15:24 rth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: rth @ 2002-04-04 15:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas.Krakowczyk, Erwin.Unruh, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, jsm28, nobody
Synopsis: Test Program A0376972.c fails with gcc-20010320, works with gcc-2.95.3
State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->feedback
State-Changed-By: rth
State-Changed-When: Thu Apr 4 15:24:56 2002
State-Changed-Why:
The 20010606-1.c test case doesn't seem to be failing on any
platform. Does this mean that the optimizer issues referred
to have been resolved?
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=2454
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: c/2454: Test Program A0376972.c fails with gcc-20010320, works with gcc-2.95.3
@ 2001-07-20 14:35 jsm28
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 @ 2001-07-20 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jsm28, Andreas.Krakowczyk, Erwin.Unruh, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, jsm28, nobody
Synopsis: Test Program A0376972.c fails with gcc-20010320, works with gcc-2.95.3
Responsible-Changed-From-To: jsm28->unassigned
Responsible-Changed-By: jsm28
Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Jul 20 14:35:38 2001
Responsible-Changed-Why:
No longer looking at this PR. The audit trail contains a
patch for the relevant C front end problem, and this is
still a regression of sorts relative to 2.95, but no-one
looked at the optimizer issues.
(Partial patch at <URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2001-06/msg00294.html >.)
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view&pr=2454&database=gcc
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* c/2454: Test Program A0376972.c fails with gcc-20010320, works with gcc-2.95.3
@ 2001-04-02 0:36 Andreas.Krakowczyk
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Andreas.Krakowczyk @ 2001-04-02 0:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-gnats; +Cc: Erwin.Unruh
>Number: 2454
>Category: c
>Synopsis: Test Program A0376972.c fails with gcc-20010320, works with gcc-2.95.3
>Confidential: no
>Severity: serious
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: sw-bug
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Mon Apr 02 00:36:00 PDT 2001
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Andreas Krakowczyk
>Release: gcc-20010320
>Organization:
>Environment:
sun-sparc-solaris2.8
>Description:
Test fails with gcc-20010320, works o.k. with gcc-2.95.3
(switch-statement with 'signed char')
>How-To-Repeat:
gcc A0376972.c && ./a.out
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
----gnatsweb-attachment----
Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="A0376972.c"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="A0376972.c"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-07-03 17:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-04-04 17:26 c/2454: Test Program A0376972.c fails with gcc-20010320, works with gcc-2.95.3 Joseph S. Myers
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-03 10:58 mmitchel
2002-04-04 22:56 Joseph S. Myers
2002-04-04 18:06 Richard Henderson
2002-04-04 15:24 rth
2001-07-20 14:35 jsm28
2001-04-02 0:36 Andreas.Krakowczyk
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).