Re: target/6299: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 C testsuite failure in execute/950511-1.c

Re: target/6299: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 C testsuite failure in execute/950511-1.c

[Richard Henderson]

The following reply was made to PR target/6299; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: target/6299: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 C testsuite failure in execute/950511-1.c
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 19:13:21 -0700

 On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 09:56:20PM -0400, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
 > Perhaps, but I look at it this way: I have a solaris box which happens
 > to allow sparcv9 insns.  The older gcc's installed on that system out
 > of the box run the testcase fine.  The current 3.1 snapshot out of the
 > box doesn't.
 
 Well, until about 2 hours ago, when I reverted the config.guess
 change -- Rainer convinced me that the name change was a bad idea.
 The rest of the configury reversion is still being bootstrapped, 
 since I want to keep the header file reorg goodness.
 
 
 r~

Re: target/6299: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 C testsuite failure in execute/950511-1.c

[ghazi]

Synopsis: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 C testsuite failure in execute/950511-1.c

State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: ghazi
State-Changed-When: Thu Apr 18 09:16:05 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    The problem seems to have disappeared now that config.guess no longer returns sparcv9- anymore.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6299

Re: target/6299: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 C testsuite failure in execute/950511-1.c

[Kaveh R. Ghazi]

The following reply was made to PR target/6299; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu>
To: rth@redhat.com
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: target/6299: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 C testsuite failure in execute/950511-1.c
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 21:56:20 -0400 (EDT)

  > From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
  > 
  > On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 04:03:24PM -0000, ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu wrote:
  > > It started as of a 4/12/2002 checkout:
  > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-04/msg00478.html
  > > 
  > > ***  This is a regression from 3.0.3 and 2.95.2.
  > 
  > Are you sure?  It actually "started" by config.guess starting
  > to generate v9 code by default.
  > r~
 
 Perhaps, but I look at it this way: I have a solaris box which happens
 to allow sparcv9 insns.  The older gcc's installed on that system out
 of the box run the testcase fine.  The current 3.1 snapshot out of the
 box doesn't.
 
 While the "guessed" configuration may have changed, from the user
 perspective its a regression because they don't know or care about the
 internal nuances of config.guess like we do.
 
 		--Kaveh
 --
 Kaveh R. Ghazi			Director of Systems Architecture
 ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu		Qwest Global Services

Re: target/6299: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 C testsuite failure in execute/950511-1.c

[Richard Henderson]

The following reply was made to PR target/6299; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
To: ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: target/6299: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 C testsuite failure in execute/950511-1.c
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 18:20:00 -0700

 On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 04:03:24PM -0000, ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu wrote:
 > It started as of a 4/12/2002 checkout:
 > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-04/msg00478.html
 > 
 > ***  This is a regression from 3.0.3 and 2.95.2.
 
 Are you sure?  It actually "started" by config.guess starting
 to generate v9 code by default.
 
 
 r~

target/6299: sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 C testsuite failure in execute/950511-1.c

[ghazi]

>Number:         6299
>Category:       target
>Synopsis:       sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 gcc-3.1 C testsuite failure in execute/950511-1.c
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    unassigned
>State:          open
>Class:          wrong-code
>Submitter-Id:   net
>Arrival-Date:   Sun Apr 14 09:06:00 PDT 2002
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Kaveh Ghazi
>Release:        gcc version 3.1 20020413 (prerelease)
>Organization:
>Environment:
sparcv9-sun-solaris2.7 native as/ld
>Description:
Testresult:

 > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/950511-1.c execution,  -O1 

It started as of a 4/12/2002 checkout:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-04/msg00478.html

***  This is a regression from 3.0.3 and 2.95.2.

>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: