Re: c++/8766: [3.2->3.2.2 regression] cc1plus segfaults after failed initialisation of static template variable

Re: c++/8766: [3.2->3.2.2 regression] cc1plus segfaults after failed initialisation of static template variable

[bangerth]

Old Synopsis: cc1plus segfaults after failed initialisation of static template variable
New Synopsis: [3.2->3.2.2 regression] cc1plus segfaults after failed initialisation of static template variable

State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Mon Dec  2 12:30:06 2002
State-Changed-Why:
    I can confirm this. It is a regression of present 3.2 branch
    vs 3.2.0. Too bad :-(
    
    The symptom on my machine is that it enters a memory
    eating loop and only dies if it is killed or runs out
    of memory.

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8766

Re: c++/8766: [3.2->3.2.2 regression] cc1plus segfaults after failed initialisation of static template variable

[Joe Buck]

The following reply was made to PR c++/8766; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Joe Buck <jbuck@synopsys.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, andrew-message@ccl.bham.ac.uk,
   bangerth@ticam.utexas.edu
Cc:  
Subject: Re: c++/8766: [3.2->3.2.2 regression] cc1plus segfaults after failed
 initialisation of static template variable
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 17:40:40 -0800

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=8766
 
 Both test cases (A and B) work with gcc 3.2.0, fail with gcc 3.2.1 and 
 the current
 3_2_branch, and work in 3_3_branch and trunk.