public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: optimization/10030: gcc 3.2(.1) produces broken code with -O2, but not -O
@ 2003-03-11 20:11 bangerth
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bangerth @ 2003-03-11 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dan.naumov, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody
Synopsis: gcc 3.2(.1) produces broken code with -O2, but not -O
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Tue Mar 11 20:11:56 2003
State-Changed-Why:
We need a smaller testcase that a whole package. Can you try
to identify which function is being miscompiled?
Please understand that we are, in general, not able to
debug whole packages to find out what goes wrong. For such
cases, we really need the help of those who submit bug
reports. Please see
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html
Thanks
Wolfgang
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10030
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: optimization/10030: gcc 3.2(.1) produces broken code with -O2, but not -O
@ 2003-03-26 10:24 ljrittle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: ljrittle @ 2003-03-26 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dan.naumov, gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, ljrittle, nobody
Synopsis: gcc 3.2(.1) produces broken code with -O2, but not -O
Responsible-Changed-From-To: unassigned->ljrittle
Responsible-Changed-By: ljrittle
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Mar 26 10:22:56 2003
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Mine. (I lowered the severity: Anything so nebulous with a posted workaround is, by default, not critical!)
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->closed
State-Changed-By: ljrittle
State-Changed-When: Wed Mar 26 10:22:56 2003
State-Changed-Why:
9 times out of 10, we never hear from these people again. Please just close ill-formed reports that refer to mega-packages...
General Notes: A compiled program crashing at -O2 but not -O
does not imply a compiler bug. This is why someone (you) will
need to produce a small test case.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=10030
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* optimization/10030: gcc 3.2(.1) produces broken code with -O2, but not -O
@ 2003-03-11 19:56 dan.naumov
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: dan.naumov @ 2003-03-11 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-gnats
>Number: 10030
>Category: optimization
>Synopsis: gcc 3.2(.1) produces broken code with -O2, but not -O
>Confidential: no
>Severity: critical
>Priority: medium
>Responsible: unassigned
>State: open
>Class: wrong-code
>Submitter-Id: net
>Arrival-Date: Tue Mar 11 19:56:00 UTC 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Dan Naumov
>Release: gcc version 3.2.1 [FreeBSD] 20021119 (release)
>Organization:
>Environment:
FreeBSD 5.0-p4
>Description:
When compiling AbiWord (http://www.abisource.com/) using CPUTYPE=athlon-tbird and CFLAGS= -O2 -pipe, the program compiles fine, but will always segfault upon exiting. Using -O instead solves the problem.
>How-To-Repeat:
1) obtain AbiWord 1.0.4
2) compile with -O2 and CPUTYPE=athlon-tbird
3) run and exit AbiWord
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-03-26 10:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-03-11 20:11 optimization/10030: gcc 3.2(.1) produces broken code with -O2, but not -O bangerth
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-26 10:24 ljrittle
2003-03-11 19:56 dan.naumov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).