public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: c++/9847: [3.4 regression] ICE on :?-operator with double class definition in  expand_expr
@ 2003-04-21 15:26 Wolfgang Bangerth
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Wolfgang Bangerth @ 2003-04-21 15:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR c++/9847; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Wolfgang Bangerth <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
To: Giovanni Bajo <giovannibajo@libero.it>
Cc: rassahah@neofonie.de, <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>, <gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: c++/9847: [3.4 regression] ICE on :?-operator with double class
 definition in  expand_expr
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2003 10:21:11 -0500 (CDT)

 > Why is this listed as 3.4 regression? I get "confused by earlier errors" on
 > 3.3, which means ICE if compiled with self-check. I think it's a 3.3/3.4
 > regression, on error recovery.
 
 Good question. You're right in any case, and I changed the synopsis.
 
 W.
 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Wolfgang Bangerth              email:            bangerth@ices.utexas.edu
                                www: http://www.ices.utexas.edu/~bangerth/
 
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: c++/9847: [3.4 regression] ICE on :?-operator with double class definition in  expand_expr
@ 2003-04-20 17:56 Giovanni Bajo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Giovanni Bajo @ 2003-04-20 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs

The following reply was made to PR c++/9847; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
To: <rassahah@neofonie.de>,
	<gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<nobody@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: "Wolfgang Bangerth" <bangerth@ices.utexas.edu>
Subject: Re: c++/9847: [3.4 regression] ICE on :?-operator with double class definition in  expand_expr
Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 19:47:55 +0200

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&p
 r=9847
 
 Why is this listed as 3.4 regression? I get "confused by earlier errors" on
 3.3, which means ICE if compiled with self-check. I think it's a 3.3/3.4
 regression, on error recovery.
 
 Giovanni Bajo
 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: c++/9847: [3.4 regression] ICE on :?-operator with double class definition in  expand_expr
@ 2003-02-25 22:37 bangerth
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: bangerth @ 2003-02-25 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, rassahah

Old Synopsis: g++-3.4 ice on :?-operator with double class definition in  expand_expr
New Synopsis: [3.4 regression] ICE on :?-operator with double class definition in  expand_expr

State-Changed-From-To: open->analyzed
State-Changed-By: bangerth
State-Changed-When: Tue Feb 25 22:37:40 2003
State-Changed-Why:
    Confirmed. A regression in mainline from 3.3

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=9847


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-04-21 15:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-04-21 15:26 c++/9847: [3.4 regression] ICE on :?-operator with double class definition in expand_expr Wolfgang Bangerth
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-20 17:56 Giovanni Bajo
2003-02-25 22:37 bangerth

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).