Re: target/5256: [arm-wince-pe] SEGV in except.c:sjlj_mark_call_sites

Re: target/5256: [arm-wince-pe] SEGV in except.c:sjlj_mark_call_sites

[Dara Hazeghi]

The following reply was made to PR target/5256; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org, nobody@gcc.gnu.org,
   keuchel@netwave.de
Cc:  
Subject: Re: target/5256: [arm-wince-pe] SEGV in except.c:sjlj_mark_call_sites
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 11:27:54 -0700

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- 
 trail&database=gcc&pr=5256
 
 Hi all,
 
 the testcase included in this PR does not fail for 3.3 cvs (20030506)  
 on cross compiler, but doesn't compile under 3.4 due to c++ changes.  
 Either this PR should be closed, or we need the original source which  
 failed.
 
 Dara
 

Re: target/5256: [arm-wince-pe] SEGV in except.c:sjlj_mark_call_sites

[Dara Hazeghi]

The following reply was made to PR target/5256; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: target/5256: [arm-wince-pe] SEGV in except.c:sjlj_mark_call_sites
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 10:39:22 -0700

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit- 
 trail&database=gcc&pr=5256
 
 Hello,
 
 I can confirm that this bug is in gcc 3.0.3 but not in 3.0.4, 3.2, 3.3  
 branch or mainline (20030506). I believe this bug can be closed.
 
 Dara
 

Re: target/5256: [arm-wince-pe] SEGV in except.c:sjlj_mark_call_sites

[Giovanni Bajo]

The following reply was made to PR target/5256; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Giovanni Bajo" <giovannibajo@libero.it>
To: <gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<keuchel@netwave.de>,
	<gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<nobody@gcc.gnu.org>,
	<gcc-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: "Dara Hazeghi" <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: target/5256: [arm-wince-pe] SEGV in except.c:sjlj_mark_call_sites
Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 01:14:40 +0200

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5256
 
 The best solution would be to able to reproduce the bug on 3.2 or 3.1
 crosscompiler, trim down the testcase to a bare minimum, and compile it with
 mainline.
 
 Giovanni Bajo
 

Re: target/5256: [arm-wince-pe] SEGV in except.c:sjlj_mark_call_sites

[Dara Hazeghi]

The following reply was made to PR target/5256; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, keuchel@netwave.de, gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org,
  nobody@gcc.gnu.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: target/5256: [arm-wince-pe] SEGV in except.c:sjlj_mark_call_sites
Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 00:22:14 -0700 (PDT)

 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=5256
 
 Hi all,
 
 the problem reported in this PR can't be replicated
 with current gcc 3.3 snapshot darwin x arm-wince-pe
 cross compiler. Compiling this testcase does not
 produce a segfault or ICE. Perhaps this bug no longer
 exists?
 
 Dara
 
 __________________________________
 Do you Yahoo!?
 The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
 http://search.yahoo.com