public inbox for gcc-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RE: target/6884: [v850] GCC overwrites return address
@ 2003-05-13 8:26 Dara Hazeghi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dara Hazeghi @ 2003-05-13 8:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR target/6884; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: Turkia Veikko <Veikko.Turkia@enermet.fi>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: target/6884: [v850] GCC overwrites return address
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 01:18:57 -0700 (PDT)
--- Turkia Veikko <Veikko.Turkia@enermet.fi> wrote:
> Hello
>
> Thank you for the reply.
> The project where we have used the gcc has finished
> and now I haven't
> possibility to test this with newer version, but in
> the future I will tell
> you the result.
> The gcc compiles effective binary and these kind
> bugs can be avoid, so it is
> useful compiler.
Since you won't be able to check if this bug still
exists, should we perhaps close it, and you can open a
new one, if you should encounter this problem in the
future? Thanks,
Dara
>
> t: VT
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dara Hazeghi [SMTP:dhazeghi@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2003 2:28 AM
> > To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org;
> veikko.turkia@enermet.fi
> > Subject: Re: target/6884: [v850] GCC overwrites
> return address
> >
> >
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-
>
> > trail&database=gcc&pr=6884
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > this bug report is against a version of gcc that
> was never officially
> > released. Could you please check your testcase
> against a current
> > official gcc release (such as 3.2.3) and report
> back the results?
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Dara
> ###########################################
>
> This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus
> for Microsoft Exchange.
> For more information, connect to http://www.F-Secure.com/
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* RE: target/6884: [v850] GCC overwrites return address
@ 2003-05-13 17:56 Dara Hazeghi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dara Hazeghi @ 2003-05-13 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR target/6884; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: Turkia Veikko <Veikko.Turkia@enermet.fi>
Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: target/6884: [v850] GCC overwrites return address
Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 10:51:12 -0700 (PDT)
--- Turkia Veikko <Veikko.Turkia@enermet.fi> wrote:
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dara Hazeghi [SMTP:dhazeghi@yahoo.com]
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 11:19 AM
> > To: Turkia Veikko
> > Cc: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org
> > Subject: RE: target/6884: [v850] GCC overwrites
> return address
> >
> >
> > --- Turkia Veikko <Veikko.Turkia@enermet.fi>
> wrote:
> > > Hello
> > >
> > > Thank you for the reply.
> > > The project where we have used the gcc has
> finished
> > > and now I haven't
> > > possibility to test this with newer version, but
> in
> > > the future I will tell
> > > you the result.
> > > The gcc compiles effective binary and these kind
> > > bugs can be avoid, so it is
> > > useful compiler.
> >
> > Since you won't be able to check if this bug still
> > exists, should we perhaps close it, and you can
> open a
> > new one, if you should encounter this problem in
> the
> > future? Thanks,
> >
> > Dara
> >
> [Turkia Veikko]
> Yes,
> I think you can close this bug and if it exist in
> the newer versions
> I will pick it up.
We'll close this one then. Thanks,
Dara
>
> t: VT
>
> PS
> This bug doesn't exist at PC environment - so it
> might be problem of
> optimizer for NEC V850,
> but if it is still there I'll tell you.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: target/6884: [v850] GCC overwrites return address
@ 2003-05-12 10:39 steven
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: steven @ 2003-05-12 10:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs, gcc-prs, nobody, veikko.turkia
Synopsis: [v850] GCC overwrites return address
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: steven
State-Changed-When: Mon May 12 10:39:24 2003
State-Changed-Why:
Feedback requested.
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-trail&database=gcc&pr=6884
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: target/6884: [v850] GCC overwrites return address
@ 2003-05-10 23:36 Dara Hazeghi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dara Hazeghi @ 2003-05-10 23:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: nobody; +Cc: gcc-prs
The following reply was made to PR target/6884; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Dara Hazeghi <dhazeghi@yahoo.com>
To: gcc-gnats@gcc.gnu.org, veikko.turkia@enermet.fi
Cc:
Subject: Re: target/6884: [v850] GCC overwrites return address
Date: Sat, 10 May 2003 16:27:49 -0700
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/gnatsweb.pl?cmd=view%20audit-
trail&database=gcc&pr=6884
Hello,
this bug report is against a version of gcc that was never officially
released. Could you please check your testcase against a current
official gcc release (such as 3.2.3) and report back the results?
Thanks,
Dara
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-05-13 17:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-05-13 8:26 target/6884: [v850] GCC overwrites return address Dara Hazeghi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-05-13 17:56 Dara Hazeghi
2003-05-12 10:39 steven
2003-05-10 23:36 Dara Hazeghi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).