From: "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com>
To: <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: i370 port - music/sp - possible generic gcc problem
Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:14:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7B52F224E6EE465EB95237D5A0D9A15F@Paullaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200911241405.nAOE5Jsd022678@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
I think I have found a bug in gcc, that still exists in gcc 4.4
I found the problem on 3.2.3 though.
While MVS and VM have basically been working fine, when I did
the port to MUSIC/SP I started getting strange compilation failures.
Initializing the stack to NULs made the problem go away, but I
persisted, and instead initialized the stack to x'01' to try to get
consistent failures.
Even with that, and the malloced memory initialized to consistent
garbage, I still didn't get the desired consistency in failures.
But it was consistent enough that I could just run it 6 times and
see if there were any failures.
Anyway, I tracked down the particular malloc() which gave changed
behaviour depending on whether the malloc() did a memory initialization
to NULs or not.
It's this one (showing 3.2.3):
C:\devel\gcc\gcc>cvs diff -l -c15
cvs diff: Diffing .
Index: ggc-page.c
===================================================================
RCS file: c:\cvsroot/gcc/gcc/ggc-page.c,v
retrieving revision 1.1.1.1
diff -c -1 -5 -r1.1.1.1 ggc-page.c
*** ggc-page.c 15 Feb 2006 10:22:25 -0000 1.1.1.1
--- ggc-page.c 28 Nov 2009 14:13:41 -0000
***************
*** 640,670 ****
#ifdef USING_MALLOC_PAGE_GROUPS
else
{
/* Allocate a large block of memory and serve out the aligned
pages therein. This results in much less memory wastage
than the traditional implementation of valloc. */
char *allocation, *a, *enda;
size_t alloc_size, head_slop, tail_slop;
int multiple_pages = (entry_size == G.pagesize);
if (multiple_pages)
alloc_size = GGC_QUIRE_SIZE * G.pagesize;
else
alloc_size = entry_size + G.pagesize - 1;
! allocation = xmalloc (alloc_size);
page = (char *) (((size_t) allocation + G.pagesize - 1)
& -G.pagesize);
head_slop = page - allocation;
if (multiple_pages)
tail_slop = ((size_t) allocation + alloc_size) & (G.pagesize - 1);
else
tail_slop = alloc_size - entry_size - head_slop;
enda = allocation + alloc_size - tail_slop;
/* We allocated N pages, which are likely not aligned, leaving
us with N-1 usable pages. We plan to place the page_group
structure somewhere in the slop. */
if (head_slop >= sizeof (page_group))
group = (page_group *)page - 1;
else
--- 640,670 ----
#ifdef USING_MALLOC_PAGE_GROUPS
else
{
/* Allocate a large block of memory and serve out the aligned
pages therein. This results in much less memory wastage
than the traditional implementation of valloc. */
char *allocation, *a, *enda;
size_t alloc_size, head_slop, tail_slop;
int multiple_pages = (entry_size == G.pagesize);
if (multiple_pages)
alloc_size = GGC_QUIRE_SIZE * G.pagesize;
else
alloc_size = entry_size + G.pagesize - 1;
! allocation = xcalloc (1, alloc_size);
page = (char *) (((size_t) allocation + G.pagesize - 1)
& -G.pagesize);
head_slop = page - allocation;
if (multiple_pages)
tail_slop = ((size_t) allocation + alloc_size) & (G.pagesize - 1);
else
tail_slop = alloc_size - entry_size - head_slop;
enda = allocation + alloc_size - tail_slop;
/* We allocated N pages, which are likely not aligned, leaving
us with N-1 usable pages. We plan to place the page_group
structure somewhere in the slop. */
if (head_slop >= sizeof (page_group))
group = (page_group *)page - 1;
else
I suspect that it has stayed hidden for so long because most people
probably have this mmap_anon:
/* Define if mmap can get us zeroed pages using MAP_ANON(YMOUS). */
#undef HAVE_MMAP_ANON
#ifdef HAVE_MMAP_ANON
# undef HAVE_MMAP_DEV_ZERO
# include <sys/mman.h>
# ifndef MAP_FAILED
# define MAP_FAILED -1
# endif
# if !defined (MAP_ANONYMOUS) && defined (MAP_ANON)
# define MAP_ANONYMOUS MAP_ANON
# endif
# define USING_MMAP
#endif
#ifndef USING_MMAP
#define USING_MALLOC_PAGE_GROUPS
#endif
Seems pretty clear that zeroed pages are required.
Looking at the code above and below this block, it uses xcalloc
instead.
It will take a couple of days to confirm that this is the last
presumed bug affecting the MUSIC/SP port.
In the meantime, can someone confirm that this code is wrong,
and that xcalloc is definitely required?
I had a look at the gcc4 code, and it is calling XNEWVEC which
is also using xmalloc instead of xcalloc, so I presume it is still
a problem today, under the right circumstances.
It took about a week to track this one down. :-)
One problem I have had for years, even on the MVS port, is that
I need to use -Os to get the exact same register selection on the
PC as the mainframe. -O0 and -O2 get slightly different register
allocations, although all versions of the code are correct. If I'm
lucky, this fix may make that problem go away, but as I said,
it'll take a couple of days before the results are in, as each build
takes about 2 hours (partly because i need to use -Os for
consistency).
Thanks. Paul.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-11-28 15:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 106+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-09 22:33 i370 port Paul Edwards
2009-09-14 15:42 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-09-15 12:59 ` Paul Edwards
2009-09-15 13:51 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-09-17 13:00 ` Paul Edwards
2009-09-17 17:55 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-09-18 0:35 ` Paul Edwards
2009-09-18 12:06 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-09-18 12:23 ` Paul Edwards
2009-09-18 13:27 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-09-18 13:42 ` Paul Edwards
2009-09-18 16:08 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-09-19 12:57 ` Paul Edwards
2009-09-25 10:19 ` Paul Edwards
2009-09-25 15:20 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-09-30 17:24 ` i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
2009-09-30 17:36 ` Richard Henderson
2009-09-30 21:40 ` Paul Edwards
[not found] ` <mcrpr98x9w8.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com>
2009-10-01 0:16 ` Joseph S. Myers
2009-10-01 14:00 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-02 12:41 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-02 16:00 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2009-10-02 22:53 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-04 4:11 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2009-10-04 5:14 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-04 6:04 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2009-10-04 6:50 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-04 15:38 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-10-04 22:51 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-05 13:15 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-10-06 9:32 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-06 13:15 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-10-06 13:38 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-06 14:01 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-10-14 14:33 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-19 14:19 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-19 17:37 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-10-20 14:18 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-20 15:30 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-11-12 14:03 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-12 20:06 ` Ralf Wildenhues
2009-11-12 20:56 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-13 11:43 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-13 12:01 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-11-13 12:18 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-13 12:57 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-11-14 8:52 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-14 10:49 ` Ralf Wildenhues
2009-11-14 11:28 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-22 0:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-11-18 10:51 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-19 14:27 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-11-21 13:40 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-23 10:33 ` i370 port - 3.4.6 to 4.4 upgrade attempt Paul Edwards
2009-11-23 10:43 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-11-23 15:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-11-24 14:05 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-11-24 14:36 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-28 15:14 ` Paul Edwards [this message]
2009-11-28 16:03 ` i370 port - music/sp - possible generic gcc problem Richard Guenther
2009-11-28 16:35 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-28 17:03 ` Richard Guenther
2009-11-28 23:44 ` Paul Edwards
2010-05-26 14:40 ` i370 port - status Paul Edwards
2021-03-14 5:55 ` negative indexes Paul Edwards
2021-03-14 8:05 ` Richard Biener
2021-03-14 8:12 ` Paul Edwards
2021-03-14 13:37 ` Richard Biener
[not found] ` <755065BE2A0B4B508DD3A262B2A83801@DESKTOP0OKG1VA>
2021-03-15 9:22 ` Richard Biener
2021-03-15 13:55 ` extended segments on 80386 Paul Edwards
2009-12-07 12:05 ` i370 port - 3.4.6 to 4.4 upgrade attempt Paul Edwards
2009-12-08 13:55 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-11-15 14:22 ` i370 port - finally building Paul Edwards
2009-11-22 0:46 ` i370 port - constructing compile script Paolo Bonzini
2009-11-13 12:08 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-10-05 13:17 ` Michael Matz
2009-10-05 13:38 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-05 13:46 ` Michael Matz
2009-10-01 14:28 ` Paul Brook
2009-10-01 16:00 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-01 18:36 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2009-10-01 23:43 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-01 21:10 ` David Edelsohn
2009-10-01 22:22 ` Toon Moene
2009-10-02 0:19 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-04 5:21 ` i370 port Paul Edwards
2009-11-04 16:47 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-11-09 14:55 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-09 15:57 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2009-11-09 23:10 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-10 14:58 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-10 15:36 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2009-11-10 15:51 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-10 15:56 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2009-12-02 22:03 ` Paul Edwards
2011-08-13 8:34 ` Paul Edwards
2011-08-15 14:32 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-15 15:26 ` Paul Edwards
2011-08-15 17:23 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-16 11:20 ` Paul Edwards
2011-08-16 13:26 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-18 12:15 ` Paul Edwards
2011-08-18 13:14 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-18 14:18 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-29 7:57 i370 port - music/sp - possible generic gcc problem Paul Edwards
2009-11-29 14:31 Paul Edwards
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7B52F224E6EE465EB95237D5A0D9A15F@Paullaptop \
--to=mutazilah@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).