From: "Paul Edwards" <mutazilah@gmail.com>
To: "Ulrich Weigand" <uweigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@codesourcery.com>, <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: i370 port
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <EA98AEA16D3E4F2ABEE6F263E06A13A3@Paullaptop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200909171755.n8HHtDTb027874@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com>
>> > The combination of predicates and constraints on this insn is broken.
>> >
>> > Before reload, the predicate "immediate_operand" explicitly allows
>> > *any* SImode immediate value. However, during reload, the "K"
>> > constraint accepts only a subset of values.
>>
>> Is there a way to give a predicate that just says "look at the
>> constraint"?
>
> Not that I'm aware of.
This below was what I was hoping for ...
>> It seems a bit overkill to add a new predicate
>> for this one instruction.
>
> As an alternative to the operand predicate, you might also add
> an extra check to the insn condition. For example, something
> along the following lines should work:
>
> (define_insn ""
> [(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=d")
> (mult:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "0")
> (match_operand:SI 2 "const_int_operand" "K")))]
> "CONST_OK_FOR_LETTER_P (INTVAL (operands[2]), 'K')"
My eyes lit up when I saw that! However, it produced a compiler
error when I tried it. But undeterred, I tried this:
(define_insn ""
[(set (match_operand:SI 0 "register_operand" "=d")
^I(mult:SI (match_operand:SI 1 "register_operand" "0")
^I^I (match_operand:SI 2 "immediate_operand" "K")))]
"(GET_CODE (operands[2]) == CONST_INT
&& REG_P (operands[0])
&& CONST_OK_FOR_LETTER_P (INTVAL (operands[2]), 'K'))"
"*
{
check_label_emit ();
mvs_check_page (0, 4, 0);
return \"MH^I%0,%H2\";
}"
[(set_attr "length" "4")]
)
And it worked (verified by self-compile)! And I relaxed the
constraint on the "M" instruction as well. Those old warnings
are apparently irrelevant now. Thank you sir. :-)
> My point was that the MH instruction on an instruction set
> architecture level *does not accept* an immediate operand,
> but only a memory operand:
>
> MH R1,D2(X2,B2) [RX]
>
> (There is a MULTIPLY HALFWORD IMMEDIATE (MHI) instruction as well,
> but I'm assuming you don't want to use it in the i370 port as that
> instruction was added later on.)
Oh, I understand now.
> So the usual way of using MH to multiply by an immediate value
> is to place the constant into memory, typically some form of
> literal pool. But I see nothing in the i370 port that would
> actually do that; instead, you seem to simply output the immediate
> value itself into the assembler source.
Right, with an "=".
> If this works, it seems that the assembler will under the covers
> manage a literal pool. I was simply wondering if this is indeed
> what you're relying on ...
Yes indeed.
And we go to a lot of effort to maintain the length of that literal
pool, so we know when we need to break out into a new page.
That's what this does:
>> mvs_check_page (0, 4, 0);
Although, as usual, it's broken. Needs to be (0, 4, 2) for the
4-byte instruction followed by the 2 bytes it will use from the
literal pool.
> (In the s390 port, the compiler will
> always manage literal pools completely on its own and does never
> rely on any assembler magic in that area.)
I see. That explains one of the difficulties of trying to get s390
instruction definitions and use them on i370. People keep asking
why I don't "just" use the s390 ones. If only life were that
simple. :-)
> Well, in this case someone has to push the constant into a literal pool.
> You can either do this at expand time by calling force_const_mem, or else
> you have to change the predicate to also accept immediates before reload
> (then reload will do the force_const_mem for you). (Note that if you in
> fact do not manage a literal pool in the compiler today but rely on the
> assembler, as discussed above, this whole approach may be difficult.)
That's putting it mildly. :-)
Anyway, with that out of the way, I'll take a look at the next one.
There's only one bug remaining that I know of, and 3 workarounds
that I would like to reverse out and fix properly.
BFN. Paul.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-09-18 0:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 162+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-09-09 22:33 Paul Edwards
2009-09-14 15:42 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-09-15 12:59 ` Paul Edwards
2009-09-15 13:51 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-09-17 13:00 ` Paul Edwards
2009-09-17 17:55 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-09-18 0:35 ` Paul Edwards [this message]
2009-09-18 12:06 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-09-18 12:23 ` Paul Edwards
2009-09-18 13:27 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-09-18 13:42 ` Paul Edwards
2009-09-18 16:08 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-09-19 12:57 ` Paul Edwards
2009-09-25 10:19 ` Paul Edwards
2009-09-25 15:20 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-09-30 17:24 ` i370 port - constructing compile script Paul Edwards
2009-09-30 17:36 ` Richard Henderson
2009-09-30 21:40 ` Paul Edwards
[not found] ` <mcrpr98x9w8.fsf@dhcp-172-17-9-151.mtv.corp.google.com>
2009-10-01 0:16 ` Joseph S. Myers
2009-10-01 14:00 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-02 12:41 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-02 16:00 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2009-10-02 22:53 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-04 4:11 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2009-10-04 5:14 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-04 6:04 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2009-10-04 6:50 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-04 15:38 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-10-04 22:51 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-05 13:15 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-10-06 9:32 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-06 13:15 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-10-06 13:38 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-06 14:01 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-10-14 14:33 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-19 14:19 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-19 17:37 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-10-20 14:18 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-20 15:30 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-11-12 14:03 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-12 20:06 ` Ralf Wildenhues
2009-11-12 20:56 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-13 11:43 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-13 12:01 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-11-13 12:18 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-13 12:57 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-11-14 8:52 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-14 10:49 ` Ralf Wildenhues
2009-11-14 11:28 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-22 0:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-11-18 10:51 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-19 14:27 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-11-21 13:40 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-23 10:33 ` i370 port - 3.4.6 to 4.4 upgrade attempt Paul Edwards
2009-11-23 10:43 ` Andreas Schwab
2009-11-23 15:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-11-24 14:05 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-11-24 14:36 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-28 15:14 ` i370 port - music/sp - possible generic gcc problem Paul Edwards
2009-11-28 16:03 ` Richard Guenther
2009-11-28 16:35 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-28 17:03 ` Richard Guenther
2009-11-28 23:44 ` Paul Edwards
2010-05-26 14:40 ` i370 port - status Paul Edwards
2021-03-14 5:55 ` negative indexes Paul Edwards
2021-03-14 8:05 ` Richard Biener
2021-03-14 8:12 ` Paul Edwards
2021-03-14 13:37 ` Richard Biener
[not found] ` <755065BE2A0B4B508DD3A262B2A83801@DESKTOP0OKG1VA>
2021-03-15 9:22 ` Richard Biener
2021-03-15 13:55 ` extended segments on 80386 Paul Edwards
2009-12-07 12:05 ` i370 port - 3.4.6 to 4.4 upgrade attempt Paul Edwards
2009-12-08 13:55 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-11-15 14:22 ` i370 port - finally building Paul Edwards
2009-11-22 0:46 ` i370 port - constructing compile script Paolo Bonzini
2009-11-13 12:08 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-10-05 13:17 ` Michael Matz
2009-10-05 13:38 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-05 13:46 ` Michael Matz
2009-10-01 14:28 ` Paul Brook
2009-10-01 16:00 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-01 18:36 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2009-10-01 23:43 ` Paul Edwards
2009-10-01 21:10 ` David Edelsohn
2009-10-01 22:22 ` Toon Moene
2009-10-02 0:19 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-04 5:21 ` i370 port Paul Edwards
2009-11-04 16:47 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-11-09 14:55 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-09 15:57 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2009-11-09 23:10 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-10 14:58 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-10 15:36 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2009-11-10 15:51 ` Paul Edwards
2009-11-10 15:56 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2009-12-02 22:03 ` Paul Edwards
2011-08-13 8:34 ` Paul Edwards
2011-08-15 14:32 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-15 15:26 ` Paul Edwards
2011-08-15 17:23 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-16 11:20 ` Paul Edwards
2011-08-16 13:26 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-18 12:15 ` Paul Edwards
2011-08-18 13:14 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-18 14:18 ` Paul Edwards
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-13 4:23 Paul Edwards
2012-04-07 5:45 Paul Edwards
2012-04-08 17:43 ` Ulrich Weigand
2014-02-11 17:01 ` Paul Edwards
2012-04-06 12:49 Paul Edwards
2012-04-06 18:16 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-04-07 4:12 ` Paul Edwards
2012-04-06 5:51 Paul Edwards
2011-08-20 12:15 Paul Edwards
2011-08-22 12:23 ` Ulrich Weigand
2012-04-05 13:32 ` Paul Edwards
2012-04-06 18:13 ` Ulrich Weigand
2011-08-20 10:09 Paul Edwards
2011-08-20 7:44 Paul Edwards
2009-09-22 12:31 Paul Edwards
2009-08-23 8:50 Paul Edwards
2009-08-26 22:13 ` Henrik Sorensen
2009-06-05 12:45 Paul Edwards
2009-06-05 14:33 ` Joseph S. Myers
2009-06-05 14:57 ` Paul Edwards
2009-06-05 15:03 ` Joseph S. Myers
2009-06-05 15:24 ` Paul Edwards
2009-06-05 15:47 ` Joseph S. Myers
2017-03-31 10:34 ` Paul Edwards
2009-09-12 12:41 ` Paul Edwards
2009-06-05 15:21 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-06-05 15:39 ` Paul Edwards
2009-06-05 15:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2009-06-05 15:57 ` Paul Edwards
2009-06-05 20:20 ` Joseph S. Myers
2009-06-05 20:45 ` Paul Edwards
2009-06-06 15:00 ` Paul Edwards
2009-06-15 17:46 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-06-19 0:06 ` Paul Edwards
2009-06-19 12:28 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-07-18 11:28 ` Paul Edwards
2009-07-20 14:27 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-08 12:04 ` Paul Edwards
2009-08-10 21:25 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-11 0:34 ` Paul Edwards
2009-08-11 15:21 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-12 11:52 ` Paul Edwards
2009-08-12 15:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-08-12 16:35 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-12 17:27 ` Paul Edwards
2009-08-12 17:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-08-12 19:46 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-12 20:31 ` Paul Edwards
2009-08-19 12:07 ` Paul Edwards
2009-08-19 12:27 ` Paolo Bonzini
2009-08-20 12:49 ` Paul Edwards
2009-08-20 22:48 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-08-21 2:37 ` Paul Edwards
2009-08-21 16:46 ` Ulrich Weigand
2009-06-05 15:44 ` Joseph S. Myers
2009-06-05 15:52 ` Paul Edwards
2009-09-08 15:55 ` Paul Edwards
2009-09-14 15:32 ` Ulrich Weigand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=EA98AEA16D3E4F2ABEE6F263E06A13A3@Paullaptop \
--to=mutazilah@gmail.com \
--cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=uweigand@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).