public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lancelot SIX <lsix@lancelotsix.com>
To: Zoran Zaric <zoran.zaric@amd.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 23/28] Add support for any location description in CFI
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:58:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211031225757.3kvczlsig7lfyzvu@ubuntu.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211014093235.69756-24-zoran.zaric@amd.com>

Hi,

I have included minor nits below

On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 10:32:30AM +0100, Zoran Zaric via Gdb-patches wrote:
> From: Zoran Zaric <Zoran.Zaric@amd.com>
> 
> One of the main benefits of allowing location description to be on the
> DWARF stack is that now CFI expression based register rules can be
> defined using a location description operations. This allows a register
> of one frame to be saved in any location, including any composite
> location.
> 
> To fully support this feature, the execute_stack_op function in
> dwarf2/frame.c needs to return a single struct value object instead of
> just an address.
> 
> Function put_frame_register_bytes also needs to change to support any
> location description.
> 
> This support is a one of the key features to truly support optimized
> code.
> 
> gdb/ChangeLog:
> 
> 	* dwarf2/frame.c (execute_stack_op): Change to return a struct
> 	value object.
> 	(dwarf2_frame_cache): Change to call new execute_stack_op
> 	definition.
> 	(dwarf2_frame_prev_register): Change to call new execute_stack_op
> 	definition.
> 	* frame.c (put_frame_register_bytes): Add support for writing to
> 	composite location description.
> ---
>  gdb/dwarf2/frame.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  gdb/frame.c        | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c b/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c
> index e17b36e243b..e70dcd5a86e 100644
> --- a/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c
> +++ b/gdb/dwarf2/frame.c
> @@ -236,16 +236,17 @@ register %s (#%d) at %s"),
>      }
>  }
>  
> -static CORE_ADDR
> +static value *
>  execute_stack_op (const gdb_byte *exp, ULONGEST len, int addr_size,
>  		  struct frame_info *this_frame, CORE_ADDR initial,
> -		  int initial_in_stack_memory, dwarf2_per_objfile *per_objfile)
> +		  int initial_in_stack_memory, dwarf2_per_objfile *per_objfile,
> +		  struct type* type = nullptr, bool as_lval = true)
>  {
>    scoped_value_mark free_values;
> -  struct type *type = address_type (per_objfile->objfile->arch (),
> -				    addr_size);
> +  struct type *init_type = address_type (per_objfile->objfile->arch (),
> +					 addr_size);
>  
> -  value *init_value = value_at_lazy (type, initial);
> +  value *init_value = value_at_lazy (init_type, initial);
>    std::vector<value *> init_values;
>  
>    set_value_stack (init_value, initial_in_stack_memory);
> @@ -255,10 +256,15 @@ execute_stack_op (const gdb_byte *exp, ULONGEST len, int addr_size,
>      = dwarf2_evaluate (exp, len, true, per_objfile, nullptr,
>  		       this_frame, addr_size, &init_values, nullptr);
>  
> -  if (VALUE_LVAL (result_val) == lval_memory)
> -    return value_address (result_val);
> -  else
> -    return value_as_address (result_val);
> +  /* We need to clean up all the values that are not needed any more.
> +     The problem with a value_ref_ptr class is that it disconnects the
> +     RETVAL from the value garbage collection, so we need to make
> +     a copy of that value on the stack to keep everything consistent.
> +     The value_ref_ptr will clean up after itself at the end of this block.  */
> +  value_ref_ptr value_holder = value_ref_ptr::new_reference (result_val);
> +  free_values.free_to_mark ();
> +
> +  return value_copy (result_val);
>  }
>  \f
>  
> @@ -989,10 +995,14 @@ dwarf2_frame_cache (struct frame_info *this_frame, void **this_cache)
>  	  break;
>  
>  	case CFA_EXP:
> -	  cache->cfa =
> -	    execute_stack_op (fs.regs.cfa_exp, fs.regs.cfa_exp_len,
> -			      cache->addr_size, this_frame, 0, 0,
> -			      cache->per_objfile);
> +	  {
> +	    struct value *value
> +	      = execute_stack_op (fs.regs.cfa_exp, fs.regs.cfa_exp_len,
> +				  cache->addr_size, this_frame, 0, 0,
> +				  cache->per_objfile);
> +	    cache->cfa = value_address (value);
> +	  }
> +
>  	  break;
>  
>  	default:
> @@ -1190,24 +1200,22 @@ dwarf2_frame_prev_register (struct frame_info *this_frame, void **this_cache,
>        return frame_unwind_got_register (this_frame, regnum, realnum);
>  
>      case DWARF2_FRAME_REG_SAVED_EXP:
> -      addr = execute_stack_op (cache->reg[regnum].loc.exp.start,
> +      return execute_stack_op (cache->reg[regnum].loc.exp.start,
>  			       cache->reg[regnum].loc.exp.len,
> -			       cache->addr_size,
> -			       this_frame, cache->cfa, 1,
> -			       cache->per_objfile);
> -      return frame_unwind_got_memory (this_frame, regnum, addr);
> +			       cache->addr_size, this_frame,
> +			       cache->cfa, 1, cache->per_objfile,
> +			       register_type (gdbarch, regnum));
>  
>      case DWARF2_FRAME_REG_SAVED_VAL_OFFSET:
>        addr = cache->cfa + cache->reg[regnum].loc.offset;
>        return frame_unwind_got_constant (this_frame, regnum, addr);
>  
>      case DWARF2_FRAME_REG_SAVED_VAL_EXP:
> -      addr = execute_stack_op (cache->reg[regnum].loc.exp.start,
> +      return execute_stack_op (cache->reg[regnum].loc.exp.start,
>  			       cache->reg[regnum].loc.exp.len,
> -			       cache->addr_size,
> -			       this_frame, cache->cfa, 1,
> -			       cache->per_objfile);
> -      return frame_unwind_got_constant (this_frame, regnum, addr);
> +			       cache->addr_size, this_frame,
> +			       cache->cfa, 1, cache->per_objfile,
> +			       register_type (gdbarch, regnum), false);
>  
>      case DWARF2_FRAME_REG_UNSPECIFIED:
>        /* GCC, in its infinite wisdom decided to not provide unwind
> diff --git a/gdb/frame.c b/gdb/frame.c
> index 16673258373..3d85d2c7b59 100644
> --- a/gdb/frame.c
> +++ b/gdb/frame.c
> @@ -1532,26 +1532,50 @@ put_frame_register_bytes (struct frame_info *frame, int regnum,
>      {
>        int curr_len = register_size (gdbarch, regnum) - offset;
>  
> +      struct value *value = frame_unwind_register_value (frame->next,
> +							 regnum);
> +
>        if (curr_len > len)
>  	curr_len = len;
>  
>        const gdb_byte *myaddr = buffer.data ();
> -      if (curr_len == register_size (gdbarch, regnum))
> +
> +      /*  Compute value is a special new case.  The problem is that
           ^^
There is one extra space at the start of the comment (and in the
subsequent lines I guess).

Also the comment related to a 'new case'.  From the perspective of
someone reading the comment in frame.c (not in a patch), this just like
a special case.  Maybe rephrase with something like:

	Computed value is a special case.  The computed callback
	mechanism requires a strut value argument, so we need to make
	one.

> +	  the computed callback mechanism only supports a struct
> +	  value arguments, so we need to make one.  */
> +      if (value != NULL && VALUE_LVAL (value) == lval_computed)

Prefer nullptr over NULL.

> +	{
> +	  const lval_funcs *funcs = value_computed_funcs (value);
> +	  type * reg_type = register_type (gdbarch, regnum);

I guess funcs->write could be checked to be non nullptr before
retrieving regtype.  If 'error' is called, reg_type has no use.

> +
> +	  if (funcs->write == NULL)

NULL -> nullptr

> +	    error (_("Attempt to assign to an unmodifiable value."));
> +
> +	  struct value *from_value = allocate_value (reg_type);
> +	  memcpy (value_contents_raw (from_value), myaddr,
> +		  TYPE_LENGTH (reg_type));
> +
> +	  set_value_offset (value, offset);
> +
> +	  funcs->write (value, from_value);
> +	  release_value (from_value);
> +	}
> +      else if (curr_len == register_size (gdbarch, regnum))
>  	{
>  	  put_frame_register (frame, regnum, myaddr);
>  	}
>        else
>  	{
> -	  struct value *value = frame_unwind_register_value (frame->next,
> -							     regnum);
>  	  gdb_assert (value != NULL);
>  
> -	  memcpy ((char *) value_contents_writeable (value) + offset, myaddr,
> -		  curr_len);
> +	  memcpy ((char *) value_contents_writeable (value) + offset,
> +		  myaddr, curr_len);
>  	  put_frame_register (frame, regnum, value_contents_raw (value));
> -	  release_value (value);
>  	}
>  
> +      if (value != NULL)

NULL -> nullptr

Best,
Lancelot.


> +	release_value (value);
> +
>        myaddr += curr_len;
>        len -= curr_len;
>        offset = 0;
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-31 22:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-14  9:32 [PATCH v3 00/28] Allow location description on the DWARF stack Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 01/28] Add new register access interface to expr.c Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 02/28] Add new memory " Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 03/28] Add new classes that model DWARF stack element Zoran Zaric
2021-10-21 23:43   ` Lancelot SIX
2021-10-22 16:38     ` Zoran Zaric
2021-10-22 21:34       ` Lancelot SIX
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 04/28] Add to_location method to DWARF entry classes Zoran Zaric
2021-10-22 21:21   ` Lancelot SIX
2021-10-25 21:23     ` Simon Marchi
2021-11-01 16:01       ` Zoran Zaric
2021-11-01 20:36         ` Simon Marchi
2021-11-01 16:00     ` Zoran Zaric
2021-11-01 17:48       ` Lancelot SIX
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 05/28] Add to_value " Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 06/28] Add read method to location description classes Zoran Zaric
2021-10-25 18:33   ` Lancelot SIX
2021-10-25 21:37     ` Simon Marchi
2021-11-02 14:26       ` Zoran Zaric
2021-11-03 19:03         ` Simon Marchi
2021-11-05 11:58           ` Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 07/28] Add write " Zoran Zaric
2021-10-25 20:21   ` Lancelot SIX
2021-11-03 10:27     ` Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 08/28] Add deref " Zoran Zaric
2021-10-25 22:31   ` Lancelot SIX
2021-11-03 10:51     ` Zoran Zaric
2021-11-03 17:37       ` Simon Marchi
2021-11-05 11:55         ` Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 09/28] Add read_from_gdb_value method to dwarf_location Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 10/28] Add write_to_gdb_value " Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 11/28] Add is_implicit_ptr_at " Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 12/28] Add indirect_implicit_ptr to dwarf_location class Zoran Zaric
2021-10-26 20:52   ` Lancelot SIX
2021-11-03 15:11     ` Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 13/28] Add is_optimized_out " Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 14/28] Add new computed struct value callback interface Zoran Zaric
2021-10-26 22:50   ` Lancelot SIX
2021-11-04 11:32     ` Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 15/28] Add to_gdb_value method to DWARF entry class Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 16/28] Change DWARF stack to use new dwarf_entry classes Zoran Zaric
2021-10-31 17:58   ` Lancelot SIX
2021-11-04 12:43     ` Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 17/28] Remove old computed struct value callbacks Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 18/28] Comments cleanup between expr.h and expr.c Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 19/28] Remove dwarf_expr_context from expr.h interface Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 20/28] Move read_addr_from_reg function to frame.c Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 21/28] Add frame info check to DW_OP_reg operations Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 22/28] Remove DWARF expression composition check Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 23/28] Add support for any location description in CFI Zoran Zaric
2021-10-31 22:58   ` Lancelot SIX [this message]
2021-11-04 15:09     ` Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 24/28] Add DWARF operations for byte and bit offset Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 25/28] Add support for DW_OP_LLVM_undefined operation Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 26/28] Add support for nested composite locations Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 27/28] Add DW_OP_LLVM_extend DWARF operation Zoran Zaric
2021-11-01 21:48   ` Lancelot SIX
2021-11-04 16:26     ` Zoran Zaric
2021-10-14  9:32 ` [PATCH v3 28/28] Add DW_OP_LLVM_select_bit_piece " Zoran Zaric
2021-11-01 22:25   ` Lancelot SIX
2021-11-04 16:39     ` Zoran Zaric
2021-11-05 11:54 ` [PATCH v3 00/28] Allow location description on the DWARF stack Zaric, Zoran (Zare)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211031225757.3kvczlsig7lfyzvu@ubuntu.lan \
    --to=lsix@lancelotsix.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=zoran.zaric@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).