public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>
To: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] gdb: testsuite: use gdb_attach to fix attach-pie-noexec.exp
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2022 07:56:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <324c1d23-d66a-695d-4e70-7026514698dc@polymtl.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1647492213-21824-4-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>



On 2022-03-17 00:43, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> If /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope is 1, when execute the following
> command without superuser:
> 
>   make check-gdb TESTS="gdb.base/attach-pie-noexec.exp"
> 
> we can see the following messages in gdb/testsuite/gdb.log:
> 
>   (gdb) attach 6500
>   Attaching to process 6500
>   ptrace: Operation not permitted.
>   (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/attach-pie-noexec.exp: attach
> 
> It is obviously wrong, the expected result should be UNSUPPORTED in such
> a case.
> 
> With this patch, we can see "Operation not permitted" in the log info,
> and then we can do the following processes to test:
> (1) set ptrace_scope as 0
>     $ echo 0 | sudo tee /proc/sys/kernel/yama/ptrace_scope
>     $ make check-gdb TESTS="gdb.base/attach-pie-noexec.exp"
> (2) use sudo
>     $ sudo make check-gdb TESTS="gdb.base/attach-pie-noexec.exp"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
> ---
>  gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/attach-pie-noexec.exp | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/attach-pie-noexec.exp b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/attach-pie-noexec.exp
> index 4712824..9a1bafe 100644
> --- a/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/attach-pie-noexec.exp
> +++ b/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/attach-pie-noexec.exp
> @@ -59,7 +59,9 @@ set testpid [spawn_id_get_pid $test_spawn_id]
>  
>  gdb_start
>  file delete -- $binfile
> -gdb_test "attach $testpid" "Attaching to process $testpid\r\n.*" "attach"
> +if {![gdb_attach $testpid]} {
> +    return 0
> +}

You can do just "return", I don't think that return value is used
anywhere.

LGTM with that.

Simon

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-17 11:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-17  4:43 [PATCH v2 0/4] gdb: add gdb_attach to fix failed testcases Tiezhu Yang
2022-03-17  4:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] gdb: testsuite: remove attach test from can_spawn_for_attach Tiezhu Yang
2022-03-17 11:50   ` Simon Marchi
2022-03-17  4:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] gdb: testsuite: add new gdb_attach to check "attach" command Tiezhu Yang
2022-03-17 11:51   ` Simon Marchi
2022-03-17 12:02     ` Simon Marchi
2022-03-17 12:29       ` Tiezhu Yang
2022-03-17  4:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] gdb: testsuite: use gdb_attach to fix attach-pie-noexec.exp Tiezhu Yang
2022-03-17 11:56   ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2022-03-17  4:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] gdb: testsuite: use gdb_attach to fix jit-elf.exp Tiezhu Yang
2022-03-17 12:02   ` Simon Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=324c1d23-d66a-695d-4e70-7026514698dc@polymtl.ca \
    --to=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pedro@palves.net \
    --cc=yangtiezhu@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).