public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
To: Thiago Jung Bauermann <thiago.bauermann@linaro.org>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/16] [gdb/aarch64] Fix register fetch/store order for native AArch64 Linux
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 17:26:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5f63fb04-32c3-e5fe-445e-709c4cdc4f35@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ila9jofh.fsf@linaro.org>

Hi,

On 7/24/23 16:53, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote:
> 
> Hello Luis,
> 
> I'm (slowly) going through your patches. I only found a few small nits
> so far.

Thanks! That will be very helpful.

> 
> Luis Machado via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:
> 
>> @@ -521,28 +522,28 @@ aarch64_fetch_registers (struct regcache *regcache, int regno)
>>        if (tdep->has_tls ())
>>  	fetch_tlsregs_from_thread (regcache);
>>      }
>> +  /* General purpose register?  */
>>    else if (regno < AARCH64_V0_REGNUM)
>>      fetch_gregs_from_thread (regcache);
>> -  else if (tdep->has_sve ())
>> +  /* SVE register?  */
>> +  else if (tdep->has_sve () && regno <= AARCH64_SVE_VG_REGNUM)
>>      fetch_sveregs_from_thread (regcache);
>> -  else
>> +  /* FPSIMD register?  */
>> +  else if (regno < AARCH64_FPCR_REGNUM)
> 
> fetch_fpregs_from_thread reads AARCH64_FPCR_REGNUM, so shouldn't the if
> condition above use '<='?
> 
> Ditto for aarch64_store_registers further below.
> 

Yes, this does look like a mistake when reworking this code.

>>      fetch_fpregs_from_thread (regcache);
>> -
>> -  if (tdep->has_pauth ())
>> -    {
>> -      if (regno == AARCH64_PAUTH_DMASK_REGNUM (tdep->pauth_reg_base)
>> -	  || regno == AARCH64_PAUTH_CMASK_REGNUM (tdep->pauth_reg_base))
>> -	fetch_pauth_masks_from_thread (regcache);
>> -    }
>> -
>> -  /* Fetch individual MTE registers.  */
>> -  if (tdep->has_mte ()
>> -      && (regno == tdep->mte_reg_base))
>> +  /* PAuth register?  */
>> +  else if (tdep->has_pauth ()
>> +	   && (regno == AARCH64_PAUTH_DMASK_REGNUM (tdep->pauth_reg_base)
>> +	       || regno == AARCH64_PAUTH_CMASK_REGNUM (tdep->pauth_reg_base)))
>> +    fetch_pauth_masks_from_thread (regcache);
>> +  /* MTE register?  */
>> +  else if (tdep->has_mte ()
>> +	   && (regno == tdep->mte_reg_base))
>>      fetch_mteregs_from_thread (regcache);
>> -
>> -  if (tdep->has_tls ()
>> -      && regno >= tdep->tls_regnum_base
>> -      && regno < tdep->tls_regnum_base + tdep->tls_register_count)
>> +  /* TLS register?  */
>> +  else if (tdep->has_tls ()
>> +	   && regno >= tdep->tls_regnum_base
>> +	   && regno < tdep->tls_regnum_base + tdep->tls_register_count)
>>      fetch_tlsregs_from_thread (regcache);
>>  }
>>  
>> @@ -592,6 +593,7 @@ aarch64_store_registers (struct regcache *regcache, int regno)
>>    aarch64_gdbarch_tdep *tdep
>>      = gdbarch_tdep<aarch64_gdbarch_tdep> (regcache->arch ());
>>  
>> +  /* Do we need to store all registers?  */
>>    if (regno == -1)
>>      {
>>        store_gregs_to_thread (regcache);
>> @@ -606,22 +608,26 @@ aarch64_store_registers (struct regcache *regcache, int regno)
>>        if (tdep->has_tls ())
>>  	store_tlsregs_to_thread (regcache);
>>      }
>> +  /* General purpose register?  */
>>    else if (regno < AARCH64_V0_REGNUM)
>>      store_gregs_to_thread (regcache);
>> -  else if (tdep->has_sve ())
>> +  /* SVE register?  */
>> +  else if (tdep->has_sve () && regno <= AARCH64_SVE_VG_REGNUM)
>>      store_sveregs_to_thread (regcache);
>> -  else
>> +  /* FPSIMD register?  */
>> +  else if (regno < AARCH64_FPCR_REGNUM)
> 
> Shouldn't it be "regno <= AARCH64_FPCR_REGNUM" here?
> 

Yes. I'll fix those up. Thanks for spotting those.

>>      store_fpregs_to_thread (regcache);
>> -
>> -  /* Store MTE registers.  */
>> -  if (tdep->has_mte ()
>> -      && (regno == tdep->mte_reg_base))
>> +  /* MTE register?  */
>> +  else if (tdep->has_mte ()
>> +	   && (regno == tdep->mte_reg_base))
>>      store_mteregs_to_thread (regcache);
>> -
>> -  if (tdep->has_tls ()
>> -      && regno >= tdep->tls_regnum_base
>> -      && regno < tdep->tls_regnum_base + tdep->tls_register_count)
>> +  /* TLS register?  */
>> +  else if (tdep->has_tls ()
>> +	   && regno >= tdep->tls_regnum_base
>> +	   && regno < tdep->tls_regnum_base + tdep->tls_register_count)
>>      store_tlsregs_to_thread (regcache);
>> +
>> +  /* PAuth registers are read-only.  */
>>  }
>>  
>>  /* A version of the "store_registers" target_ops method used when running
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2023-07-24 16:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-06-30 13:46 [PATCH v3 00/16] SME support for AArch64 gdb/gdbserver on Linux Luis Machado
2023-06-30 13:46 ` [PATCH v3 01/16] [gdb/aarch64] Fix register fetch/store order for native AArch64 Linux Luis Machado
2023-07-24 15:53   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2023-07-24 16:26     ` Luis Machado [this message]
2023-06-30 13:46 ` [PATCH v3 02/16] [gdb/aarch64] refactor: Rename SVE-specific files Luis Machado
2023-06-30 13:46 ` [PATCH v3 03/16] [gdb/gdbserver] refactor: Simplify SVE interface to read/write registers Luis Machado
2023-07-24 16:19   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2023-07-25  9:28     ` Luis Machado
2023-06-30 13:46 ` [PATCH v3 04/16] [gdb/aarch64] sve: Fix return command when using V registers in a SVE-enabled target Luis Machado
2023-06-30 13:46 ` [PATCH v3 05/16] [gdb/aarch64] sme: Enable SME registers and pseudo-registers Luis Machado
2023-07-26 20:01   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2023-07-27  9:01     ` Luis Machado
2023-07-28  1:19       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2023-06-30 13:46 ` [PATCH v3 06/16] [gdbserver/aarch64] refactor: Adjust expedited registers dynamically Luis Machado
2023-06-30 13:46 ` [PATCH v3 07/16] [gdbserver/aarch64] sme: Add support for SME Luis Machado
2023-07-27 19:41   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2023-06-30 13:46 ` [PATCH v3 08/16] [gdb/aarch64] sve: Fix signal frame z/v register restore Luis Machado
2023-07-27 21:52   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2023-07-31 12:22     ` Luis Machado
2023-06-30 13:46 ` [PATCH v3 09/16] [gdb/aarch64] sme: Signal frame support Luis Machado
2023-07-27 22:25   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2023-07-31 12:23     ` Luis Machado
2023-06-30 13:46 ` [PATCH v3 10/16] [gdb/aarch64] sme: Fixup sigframe gdbarch when vg/svg changes Luis Machado
2023-07-28  1:01   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2023-07-31 12:27     ` Luis Machado
2023-06-30 13:46 ` [PATCH v3 11/16] [gdb/aarch64] sme: Support TPIDR2 signal frame context Luis Machado
2023-06-30 13:46 ` [PATCH v3 12/16] [gdb/generic] corefile/bug: Use thread-specific gdbarch when dumping register state to core files Luis Machado
2023-06-30 13:46 ` [PATCH v3 13/16] [gdb/generic] corefile/bug: Fixup (gcore) core file target description reading order Luis Machado
2023-07-28  3:12   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2023-07-31 11:38     ` Luis Machado
2023-09-05  8:28     ` Luis Machado
2023-06-30 13:46 ` [PATCH v3 14/16] [gdb/aarch64] sme: Core file support for Linux Luis Machado
2023-08-03  0:18   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2023-08-03 11:37     ` Luis Machado
2023-08-04 20:45       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2023-06-30 13:46 ` [PATCH v3 15/16] [gdb/testsuite] sme: Add SVE/SME testcases Luis Machado
2023-08-04  0:59   ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2023-08-11 15:42     ` Luis Machado
2023-08-12  0:42       ` Thiago Jung Bauermann
2023-06-30 13:46 ` [PATCH v3 16/16] [gdb/docs] sme: Document SME registers and features Luis Machado
2023-07-01  8:58   ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-07-03  9:52     ` Luis Machado
2023-07-03 12:03       ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-07-03 12:06         ` Luis Machado
2023-07-17 11:40 ` [PING][PATCH v3 00/16] SME support for AArch64 gdb/gdbserver on Linux Luis Machado
2023-07-24  8:15 ` Luis Machado
2023-08-04 21:24 ` [PATCH " Thiago Jung Bauermann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5f63fb04-32c3-e5fe-445e-709c4cdc4f35@arm.com \
    --to=luis.machado@arm.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=thiago.bauermann@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).