public inbox for gdb-patches@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] gdbsupport: fix array-view compilation with c++11 && _GLIBCXX_DEBUG
@ 2021-11-18 20:41 Simon Marchi
  2021-11-19 20:29 ` Tom Tromey
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Simon Marchi @ 2021-11-18 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gdb-patches; +Cc: Simon Marchi

When building with -std=c++11 and -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG=1, we get some errors
like:

      CXX    unittests/array-view-selftests.o
    In file included from /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/utils.h:25,
                     from /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/defs.h:630,
                     from /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/unittests/array-view-selftests.c:20:
    /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/../gdbsupport/array-view.h: In instantiation of ‘constexpr gdb::array_view<T> gdb::array_view<T>::slice(gdb::array_view<T>::size_type, gdb::array_view<T>::size_type) const [with T = unsigned char; gdb::array_view<T>::size_type = long unsigned int]’:
    /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/unittests/array-view-selftests.c:532:29:   required from here
    /home/smarchi/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/../gdbsupport/array-view.h:192:3: error: body of ‘constexpr’ function ‘constexpr gdb::array_view<T> gdb::array_view<T>::slice(gdb::array_view<T>::size_type, gdb::array_view<T>::size_type) const [with T = unsigned char; gdb::array_view<T>::size_type = long unsigned int]’ not a return-statement
      192 |   }
          |   ^

This is because constexpr functions in C++ can only consist of a single
return statement, so we can't have the gdb_assert in there.  Make the
gdb_assert presence conditional to the __cplusplus version, to enable it
only for c++14 and later.

Change-Id: I2ac33f7b4bd1765ddc3ac8d07445b16ac1f340f0
---
 gdbsupport/array-view.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdbsupport/array-view.h b/gdbsupport/array-view.h
index 6f7e45a979c..edf66559e2d 100644
--- a/gdbsupport/array-view.h
+++ b/gdbsupport/array-view.h
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ class array_view
   }
   constexpr const_reference operator[] (size_t index) const noexcept
   {
-#if defined(_GLIBCXX_DEBUG)
+#if defined(_GLIBCXX_DEBUG) && __cplusplus >= 201402L
     gdb_assert (index < m_size);
 #endif
     return m_array[index];
@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ class array_view
   /* Return a new array view over SIZE elements starting at START.  */
   constexpr array_view<T> slice (size_type start, size_type size) const noexcept
   {
-#if defined(_GLIBCXX_DEBUG)
+#if defined(_GLIBCXX_DEBUG) && __cplusplus >= 201402L
     gdb_assert (start + size <= m_size);
 #endif
     return {m_array + start, size};
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ class array_view
      inclusive.  */
   constexpr array_view<T> slice (size_type start) const noexcept
   {
-#if defined(_GLIBCXX_DEBUG)
+#if defined(_GLIBCXX_DEBUG) && __cplusplus >= 201402L
     gdb_assert (start <= m_size);
 #endif
     return {m_array + start, size () - start};
-- 
2.33.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] gdbsupport: fix array-view compilation with c++11 && _GLIBCXX_DEBUG
  2021-11-18 20:41 [PATCH] gdbsupport: fix array-view compilation with c++11 && _GLIBCXX_DEBUG Simon Marchi
@ 2021-11-19 20:29 ` Tom Tromey
  2021-11-20  4:26   ` Simon Marchi
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Tom Tromey @ 2021-11-19 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches; +Cc: Simon Marchi

>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:

Simon> This is because constexpr functions in C++ can only consist of a single
Simon> return statement, so we can't have the gdb_assert in there.  Make the
Simon> gdb_assert presence conditional to the __cplusplus version, to enable it
Simon> only for c++14 and later.

Seems fine to me.  Thanks.

Tom

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] gdbsupport: fix array-view compilation with c++11 && _GLIBCXX_DEBUG
  2021-11-19 20:29 ` Tom Tromey
@ 2021-11-20  4:26   ` Simon Marchi
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Simon Marchi @ 2021-11-20  4:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tom Tromey, Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches



On 2021-11-19 15:29, Tom Tromey wrote:
>>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Marchi via Gdb-patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org> writes:
> 
> Simon> This is because constexpr functions in C++ can only consist of a single
> Simon> return statement, so we can't have the gdb_assert in there.  Make the
> Simon> gdb_assert presence conditional to the __cplusplus version, to enable it
> Simon> only for c++14 and later.
> 
> Seems fine to me.  Thanks.
> 
> Tom
> 

Thanks, pushed.

Simon

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-11-20  4:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-11-18 20:41 [PATCH] gdbsupport: fix array-view compilation with c++11 && _GLIBCXX_DEBUG Simon Marchi
2021-11-19 20:29 ` Tom Tromey
2021-11-20  4:26   ` Simon Marchi

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).