public inbox for gdb-prs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug gdb/13498] New: save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4
@ 2011-12-14 17:21 l.lunak at suse dot cz
2011-12-14 23:28 ` [Bug gdb/13498] " l.lunak at suse dot cz
` (15 more replies)
0 siblings, 16 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: l.lunak at suse dot cz @ 2011-12-14 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13498
Bug #: 13498
Summary: save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4
Product: gdb
Version: HEAD
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: gdb
AssignedTo: unassigned@sourceware.org
ReportedBy: l.lunak@suse.cz
Classification: Unclassified
When using the gdb-add-index script in order to modify binaries for faster load
in gdb, some operations such as tab completion of function names are noticeably
slower if the binaries have been built with -gdwarf-4. I experience the problem
on openSUSE 11.4 with a git LibreOffice build, using
gdb-weekly-7.3.50.20111213.tar.bz2 snapshot built from source.
Steps to reproduce:
1) Build LibreOffice with -gdwarf-4
(http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Native_Build , --enable-debug
passed to autogen/configure, current git uses -gdwarf-4 by default if
supported, otherwise can be passed manually by invoking make as
'CFLAGS="-gdwarf-4" CXXFLAGS="-gdwarf-4" make')
2) Run LibreOffice, open an empty Writer document, type in something and save
as a .docx document.
3) Attach gdb, type 'break DocxA<tab>', watch the time it took to complete the
name to DocxAttributeOutput. Try repeatedly (second time it's faster).
4) Modify LibreOffice binaries using the gdb-add-index script (for dev-install
build they are in solver/*/lib/, for normal install they are in
basis3.4/program/).
5) Repeat steps 2) and 3), watch the increased time needed to complete the
function name (second completion takes at most 1 second without the saved index
and more than 5 seconds with it, and this is a fast machine).
The problem presumably exists in other scenarios and other codebases, assuming
they are large enough to make the slowness noticeable.
Further information:
- using dwarf4 instead of dwarf2 saves about 30% size of LibreOffice's binaries
when built with debug info
- the problem does not seem to exist when building with -gdwarf-2
- the debug flag passed to gcc/g++ is -ggdb2 (besides the -gdwarf-2/4)
- the .gdb_index sections in the binaries appear to be loaded both with dwarf2
and dwarf4 by gdb, the load time is faster and memory usage is lower
- when examining /proc/<pid>/status of gdb, in the case of .gdb_index and
dwarf4, VmHWM and VmData are almost the same, while in the dwarf2 case the
VmHWM is about 20% larger than VmData (perhaps in the dwarf2 case gdb generates
additional internal data that is not generated in the dwarf4 case and that
causes this?)
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/13498] save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4
2011-12-14 17:21 [Bug gdb/13498] New: save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4 l.lunak at suse dot cz
@ 2011-12-14 23:28 ` l.lunak at suse dot cz
2011-12-15 15:55 ` l.lunak at suse dot cz
` (14 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: l.lunak at suse dot cz @ 2011-12-14 23:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13498
--- Comment #1 from Luboš Luňák <l.lunak at suse dot cz> 2011-12-14 23:27:48 UTC ---
Ok, I think I've figured out where the problem is.
When completing, location_completer() calls also
make_source_files_completion_list(), which calls
map_partial_symbol_filenames(). That one is where most of the time during the
completion is spent - it calls the proper map_symbol_filenames function
depending on the debugging format - for .so's without an index, it's
map_symbol_filenames_psymtab(), for indexed files, it is
dw2_map_symbol_filenames().
The problem is, with dwarf4-based index, dw2_map_symbol_filenames() iterates
over a huge number of filenames, magnitudes more than with dwarf2-based index
or psymtabs (in my case, it's 35M filenames with dwarf4 index, 380k with dwarf4
without index, 720k with dwarf2 index, 220k with dwarf2 without index). All the
time is spent just iterating over them. And the number is so high because there
are many duplicates, as high as 175k duplicates for the most common header
files.
I don't know DWARF or gdb, so I'm not sure what the proper fix should be.
Possibly the save-index functionality should try to eliminate these duplicates.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/13498] save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4
2011-12-14 17:21 [Bug gdb/13498] New: save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4 l.lunak at suse dot cz
2011-12-14 23:28 ` [Bug gdb/13498] " l.lunak at suse dot cz
@ 2011-12-15 15:55 ` l.lunak at suse dot cz
2012-02-15 12:12 ` lionel at mamane dot lu
` (13 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: l.lunak at suse dot cz @ 2011-12-15 15:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13498
--- Comment #2 from Luboš Luňák <l.lunak at suse dot cz> 2011-12-15 15:54:43 UTC ---
It takes so long because dw2_map_symbol_filenames() loops over both
dwarf2_per_objfile::all_comp_units and dwarf2_per_objfile::type_comp_units,
where e.g. LibreOffice's libswlo.so has ~700 of the first and ~16000 of the
second. It appears unnecessary to iterate over type_comp_units, as
all_comp_units should already include all the files encountered during
compilation.
But it turns out gdb performs poorly with DWARF4 in general. In this case
dw2_map_symbol_filenames() could be fixed, assuming what I wrote above is
correct, but there appear to be other inefficiencies (related to .debug_types
too?). E.g. 'break shared<tab>' (trying to complete a filename) is very fast
with DWARF2, but takes very long with DWARF4, with or without the gdb index,
and it also noticeably increases memory usage.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/13498] save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4
2011-12-14 17:21 [Bug gdb/13498] New: save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4 l.lunak at suse dot cz
2011-12-14 23:28 ` [Bug gdb/13498] " l.lunak at suse dot cz
2011-12-15 15:55 ` l.lunak at suse dot cz
@ 2012-02-15 12:12 ` lionel at mamane dot lu
2012-02-16 11:00 ` mjw at redhat dot com
` (12 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: lionel at mamane dot lu @ 2012-02-15 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13498
Lionel Elie Mamane <lionel at mamane dot lu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |lionel at mamane dot lu
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/13498] save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4
2011-12-14 17:21 [Bug gdb/13498] New: save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4 l.lunak at suse dot cz
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-15 12:12 ` lionel at mamane dot lu
@ 2012-02-16 11:00 ` mjw at redhat dot com
2012-02-17 21:48 ` tromey at redhat dot com
` (11 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: mjw at redhat dot com @ 2012-02-16 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13498
Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mjw at redhat dot com
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/13498] save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4
2011-12-14 17:21 [Bug gdb/13498] New: save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4 l.lunak at suse dot cz
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-16 11:00 ` mjw at redhat dot com
@ 2012-02-17 21:48 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2012-02-17 21:52 ` tromey at redhat dot com
` (10 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: tromey at redhat dot com @ 2012-02-17 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13498
Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tromey at redhat dot com
AssignedTo|unassigned at sourceware |tromey at redhat dot com
|dot org |
--- Comment #3 from Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com> 2012-02-17 21:48:26 UTC ---
Thanks for your analysis. It was very helpful.
The LibreOffice build crushed my machine, I'm sure you've heard this
before :), but I was able to reproduce the problem to my satisfaction
just with libooxlo.so. So far I've only built with DWARF-4 and .debug_types
(if you are using a recent Fedora you must also specify -fdebug-types-section).
I can definitely see a slowdown when moving from the non-indexed to the indexed
library (times from "maint time 1", which irritatingly does not work with
-ex options):
No index
(gdb) complete break int_CRYPTO_set_do_dynlock_call
break int_CRYPTO_set_do_dynlock_callback
Command execution time: 0.118982 (cpu), 0.120245 (wall)
(gdb) complete break int_CRYPTO_set_do_dynlock_call
break int_CRYPTO_set_do_dynlock_callback
Command execution time: 0.123981 (cpu), 0.125739 (wall)
Index
(gdb) complete break int_CRYPTO_set_do_dynlock_call
break int_CRYPTO_set_do_dynlock_callback
Command execution time: 4.362337 (cpu), 4.382212 (wall)
(gdb) complete break int_CRYPTO_set_do_dynlock_call
break int_CRYPTO_set_do_dynlock_callback
Command execution time: 3.187515 (cpu), 3.201839 (wall)
With a reasonably simple patch I can get this down to:
(gdb) complete break int_CRYPTO_set_do_dynlock_call
break int_CRYPTO_set_do_dynlock_callback
Command execution time: 1.255809 (cpu), 1.260110 (wall)
(gdb) complete break int_CRYPTO_set_do_dynlock_call
break int_CRYPTO_set_do_dynlock_callback
Command execution time: 0.111983 (cpu), 0.112815 (wall)
... the first completion is still quite slow, but later ones
are fast.
Further investigation and fixes will have to wait until next week.
I'll attach my WIP patch momentarily.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/13498] save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4
2011-12-14 17:21 [Bug gdb/13498] New: save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4 l.lunak at suse dot cz
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-17 21:48 ` tromey at redhat dot com
@ 2012-02-17 21:52 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2012-02-20 13:51 ` l.lunak at suse dot cz
` (9 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: tromey at redhat dot com @ 2012-02-17 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13498
--- Comment #4 from Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com> 2012-02-17 21:51:01 UTC ---
Created attachment 6226
--> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6226
WIP patch
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/13498] save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4
2011-12-14 17:21 [Bug gdb/13498] New: save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4 l.lunak at suse dot cz
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-17 21:52 ` tromey at redhat dot com
@ 2012-02-20 13:51 ` l.lunak at suse dot cz
2012-02-20 19:51 ` tromey at redhat dot com
` (8 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: l.lunak at suse dot cz @ 2012-02-20 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13498
--- Comment #5 from Luboš Luňák <l.lunak at suse dot cz> 2012-02-20 13:48:42 UTC ---
I'd like to point out again the second paragraph in comment #2. It's been a
while since I did this analysis, so I don't remember all the details anymore
and getting into it again would take some time, therefore this is a bit of
guesswork and trying to recall, but as far as I remember:
I think I concluded that this is not a localized problem in
dw2_map_symbol_filenames(), but a design problem with the gdb internal
structures. I had a patch for dw2_map_symbol_filenames() that would have worked
sufficiently for me for that one specific problem, but I went back to dwarf-2
anyway, and IIRC I decided that larger changes were needed that I wasn't
feeling up to.
Specifically, I think I found the bottleneck to be
dwarf2_per_objfile->n_type_units being a large number in general that slows
down more operations than just the one specific example given. As I understand
it dwarf-2 had this number quite low, so it wasn't a problem, but dwarf-4 by
design causes the number to be much higher.
Again, this is just trying to recall things from 2 months ago with my limited
gdb knowledge, so you should verify this yourself, but I suggest first checking
gdb's performance in general when dealing with large dwarf-4-built .so files.
Maybe it'll be necessary to change all accesses to the CU-list (or whatever
it's called exactly) to be more efficient (compact it into less items,
hashtable for access, whatever).
Also, for the save-index case, since gdb creates the index on its own anyway,
it could possibly make sense to prepare it better for the completion case. As I
understand it, gdb always first collects all items for completion and only
afterwards it selects ones eligible for completion, so maybe the index could
also contain a sorted list of (references to) all completion items in the
matching .so, which presumably would take only relatively little space and
would make completion almost instant.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/13498] save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4
2011-12-14 17:21 [Bug gdb/13498] New: save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4 l.lunak at suse dot cz
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-20 13:51 ` l.lunak at suse dot cz
@ 2012-02-20 19:51 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2012-02-20 19:55 ` tromey at redhat dot com
` (7 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: tromey at redhat dot com @ 2012-02-20 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13498
--- Comment #6 from Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com> 2012-02-20 19:51:01 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I think I concluded that this is not a localized problem in
> dw2_map_symbol_filenames(), but a design problem with the gdb internal
> structures. I had a patch for dw2_map_symbol_filenames() that would have worked
> sufficiently for me for that one specific problem, but I went back to dwarf-2
> anyway, and IIRC I decided that larger changes were needed that I wasn't
> feeling up to.
What I did today is look at all the places where we iterate over all
CUs and TUs when using the index. Then I went backward from here to
find the callers and thus construct test cases that may exhibit bad
behavior.
Aside from map_symbol_filenames, which I've already fixed locally,
there were only 2 such methods that could plausibly cause problems:
map_symtabs_matching_filenames and expand_symtabs_matching.
The former had a very bad performance bug in CVS HEAD:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-02/msg00409.html
However, this is pretty new and I don't think it would have shown up
in your tests :-(
The test case for this one, with libooxlo.so is just:
break numberformatsbuffer.cxx:100
In my testing, the latter is slower when type units are present, but
not drastically so. The index speeds things up in both cases:
Normal Index
+-------+-------+
DW3 |0:07.61|0:01.76|
+-------+-------+
DW4 |0:08.80|0:03.45|
+-------+-------+
I plan to look into this one a bit more.
The test case here is:
info function CRYPTO
> Specifically, I think I found the bottleneck to be
> dwarf2_per_objfile->n_type_units being a large number in general that slows
> down more operations than just the one specific example given. As I understand
> it dwarf-2 had this number quite low, so it wasn't a problem, but dwarf-4 by
> design causes the number to be much higher.
Yes, in DWARF < 4, there are no type units.
BTW you might wish to use -gdwarf-4 -fno-debug-types-section.
This gets you some DWARF 4 benefits without type units; it should be
a pure improvement over DWARF[23].
I'm definitely interested if you know of other specific things that are
too slow.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/13498] save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4
2011-12-14 17:21 [Bug gdb/13498] New: save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4 l.lunak at suse dot cz
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-20 19:51 ` tromey at redhat dot com
@ 2012-02-20 19:55 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2012-02-20 20:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: tromey at redhat dot com @ 2012-02-20 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13498
--- Comment #7 from Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com> 2012-02-20 19:54:36 UTC ---
Ok, I found one more slowdown. The test case:
rbreak numberformatsbuffer.cxx:zardoz
Is notably slower for DWARF 4 + index.
I think this is due to the same problem as affected map_symbol_filenames.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/13498] save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4
2011-12-14 17:21 [Bug gdb/13498] New: save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4 l.lunak at suse dot cz
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-20 19:55 ` tromey at redhat dot com
@ 2012-02-20 20:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-21 6:32 ` dje at google dot com
` (5 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-02-20 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13498
--- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-02-20 20:56:16 UTC ---
CVSROOT: /cvs/src
Module name: src
Changes by: tromey@sourceware.org 2012-02-20 20:56:13
Modified files:
gdb : ChangeLog dwarf2read.c
Log message:
PR gdb/13498:
* dwarf2read.c (dw2_expand_symtabs_matching): Only visit a
particular set of file names once.
(dw2_map_symbol_filenames): Likewise.
Patches:
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gdb/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.13847&r2=1.13848
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gdb/dwarf2read.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.613&r2=1.614
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/13498] save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4
2011-12-14 17:21 [Bug gdb/13498] New: save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4 l.lunak at suse dot cz
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-20 20:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-02-21 6:32 ` dje at google dot com
2012-02-21 18:17 ` l.lunak at suse dot cz
` (4 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: dje at google dot com @ 2012-02-21 6:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13498
dje at google dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dje at google dot com
--- Comment #9 from dje at google dot com 2012-02-21 06:31:59 UTC ---
What's there now re. TUs could stand for a bit of reorg.
'tis on my long symtab wishlist.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/13498] save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4
2011-12-14 17:21 [Bug gdb/13498] New: save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4 l.lunak at suse dot cz
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-21 6:32 ` dje at google dot com
@ 2012-02-21 18:17 ` l.lunak at suse dot cz
2012-07-08 19:35 ` dje at google dot com
` (3 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: l.lunak at suse dot cz @ 2012-02-21 18:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13498
--- Comment #10 from Luboš Luňák <l.lunak at suse dot cz> 2012-02-21 18:14:25 UTC ---
I've tried current gdb CVS with the patch mentioned here, and it looks like the
problems caused by the index have been fixed by it, so I guess this bugreport
can be closed.
Attaching gdb to LibreOffice Writer and doing 'break sha<tab>' is still awfully
slow with dwarf-4 though, roughly 30 seconds on a rather fast machine (it
appears the time is spent in dwarf2_psymtab_to_symtab() and below). That is
however with or without the index. With dwarf-2 it is almost instant, but the
difference is that with dwarf-2 the completion list does not include template
instances, which is a majority of the completions. I find this still
unacceptable for dwarf-4 to be usable with something the size LibreOffice.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/13498] save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4
2011-12-14 17:21 [Bug gdb/13498] New: save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4 l.lunak at suse dot cz
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2012-02-21 18:17 ` l.lunak at suse dot cz
@ 2012-07-08 19:35 ` dje at google dot com
2012-07-10 20:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: dje at google dot com @ 2012-07-08 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13498
dje at google dot com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|tromey at redhat dot com |dje at google dot com
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/13498] save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4
2011-12-14 17:21 [Bug gdb/13498] New: save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4 l.lunak at suse dot cz
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2012-07-08 19:35 ` dje at google dot com
@ 2012-07-10 20:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-31 13:08 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
2023-12-31 16:42 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-07-10 20:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13498
--- Comment #11 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-10 20:28:38 UTC ---
CVSROOT: /cvs/src
Module name: src
Changes by: devans@sourceware.org 2012-07-10 20:28:34
Modified files:
gdb : ChangeLog dwarf2read.c
Log message:
PR gdb/13498
* dwarf2read.c (dwarf2_per_objfile): New members n_type_unit_groups,
all_type_unit_groups, type_unit_groups, tu_stats.
(dwarf2_per_cu_data): Move "imported_symtabs" into new union "s".
All uses updated. Add type_unit_group to union "s".
(type_unit_group): New struct.
(IS_TYPE_UNIT_GROUP): New macro.
(abbrev_table): Delete unused member "section".
(dw2_do_instantiate_symtab): Early exit if type_unit_group.
(dw2_get_cu): Assert not used with type_unit_group.
(dw2_get_primary_cu): New function.
(dw2_build_type_unit_groups_reader): New function.
(dw2_build_type_unit_groups): New function.
(dw2_get_file_names): Assert not called on type units.
(dw2_map_symtabs_matching_filename): Call dw2_build_type_unit_groups.
Redo loop to iterate over type unit groups instead of type units.
(dw2_expand_symtabs_matching, dw2_map_symbol_filenames): Ditto.
(read_abbrev_offset): New function.
(init_cutu_and_read_dies): New arg "abbrev_table". All callers
updated.
(create_partial_symtab): New function.
(process_psymtab_comp_unit_reader): Assert not used with type units.
Call create_partial_symtab.
(process_psymtab_type_unit): Delete.
(hash_type_unit_group, eq_type_unit_group): New functions.
(allocate_type_unit_groups_table): New function.
(NO_STMT_LIST_TYPE_UNIT_PSYMTAB): New macro.
(NO_STMT_LIST_TYPE_UNIT_PSYMTAB_SIZE): New macro.
(create_type_unit_group, get_type_unit_group): New functions.
(tu_abbrev_offset): New struct.
(sort_tu_by_abbrev_offset): New function.
(add_type_unit_group_to_table): New function.
(build_type_unit_groups): New function.
(build_type_psymtabs_reader): New function.
(build_type_psymtab_dependencies): New function.
(build_type_psymtabs): Rewrite.
(scan_partial_symbols): Flag an error if a DW_TAG_imported_unit
is seen in a type unit.
(process_queue): Move symtab expansion debugging printfs here.
Call process_full_type_unit for type units.
(compute_symtab_includes): Assert not called for type units.
(process_cu_includes): Don't call compute_symtab_includes for
type units.
(process_full_type_unit): New function.
(process_imported_unit_die): Flag an error if called for type units.
(handle_DW_AT_stmt_list): Delete arg "want_line_info". All callers
updated. Assert not called for type units.
(read_file_scope): Call dwarf2_start_symtab.
(setup_type_unit_groups): New function.
(read_type_unit_scope): Rewrite.
(abbrev_table_read_table): Initialize abbrev_table->offset.
(abbrev_table_free_cleanup): New function.
(dwarf2_start_symtab): New function.
(load_full_type_unit): Assert not called for type unit groups.
Patches:
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gdb/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.14457&r2=1.14458
http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gdb/dwarf2read.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.683&r2=1.684
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/13498] save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4
2011-12-14 17:21 [Bug gdb/13498] New: save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4 l.lunak at suse dot cz
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2012-07-10 20:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-12-31 13:08 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
2023-12-31 16:42 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: ssbssa at sourceware dot org @ 2023-12-31 13:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13498
Hannes Domani <ssbssa at sourceware dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ssbssa at sourceware dot org
--- Comment #12 from Hannes Domani <ssbssa at sourceware dot org> ---
(In reply to Sourceware Commits from comment #11)
> CVSROOT: /cvs/src
> Module name: src
> Changes by: devans@sourceware.org 2012-07-10 20:28:34
>
> Modified files:
> gdb : ChangeLog dwarf2read.c
>
> Log message:
> PR gdb/13498
> * dwarf2read.c (dwarf2_per_objfile): New members n_type_unit_groups,
> all_type_unit_groups, type_unit_groups, tu_stats.
> (dwarf2_per_cu_data): Move "imported_symtabs" into new union "s".
> All uses updated. Add type_unit_group to union "s".
> (type_unit_group): New struct.
> (IS_TYPE_UNIT_GROUP): New macro.
> (abbrev_table): Delete unused member "section".
> (dw2_do_instantiate_symtab): Early exit if type_unit_group.
> (dw2_get_cu): Assert not used with type_unit_group.
> (dw2_get_primary_cu): New function.
> (dw2_build_type_unit_groups_reader): New function.
> (dw2_build_type_unit_groups): New function.
> (dw2_get_file_names): Assert not called on type units.
> (dw2_map_symtabs_matching_filename): Call dw2_build_type_unit_groups.
> Redo loop to iterate over type unit groups instead of type units.
> (dw2_expand_symtabs_matching, dw2_map_symbol_filenames): Ditto.
> (read_abbrev_offset): New function.
> (init_cutu_and_read_dies): New arg "abbrev_table". All callers
> updated.
> (create_partial_symtab): New function.
> (process_psymtab_comp_unit_reader): Assert not used with type units.
> Call create_partial_symtab.
> (process_psymtab_type_unit): Delete.
> (hash_type_unit_group, eq_type_unit_group): New functions.
> (allocate_type_unit_groups_table): New function.
> (NO_STMT_LIST_TYPE_UNIT_PSYMTAB): New macro.
> (NO_STMT_LIST_TYPE_UNIT_PSYMTAB_SIZE): New macro.
> (create_type_unit_group, get_type_unit_group): New functions.
> (tu_abbrev_offset): New struct.
> (sort_tu_by_abbrev_offset): New function.
> (add_type_unit_group_to_table): New function.
> (build_type_unit_groups): New function.
> (build_type_psymtabs_reader): New function.
> (build_type_psymtab_dependencies): New function.
> (build_type_psymtabs): Rewrite.
> (scan_partial_symbols): Flag an error if a DW_TAG_imported_unit
> is seen in a type unit.
> (process_queue): Move symtab expansion debugging printfs here.
> Call process_full_type_unit for type units.
> (compute_symtab_includes): Assert not called for type units.
> (process_cu_includes): Don't call compute_symtab_includes for
> type units.
> (process_full_type_unit): New function.
> (process_imported_unit_die): Flag an error if called for type units.
> (handle_DW_AT_stmt_list): Delete arg "want_line_info". All callers
> updated. Assert not called for type units.
> (read_file_scope): Call dwarf2_start_symtab.
> (setup_type_unit_groups): New function.
> (read_type_unit_scope): Rewrite.
> (abbrev_table_read_table): Initialize abbrev_table->offset.
> (abbrev_table_free_cleanup): New function.
> (dwarf2_start_symtab): New function.
> (load_full_type_unit): Assert not called for type unit groups.
>
> Patches:
> http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gdb/ChangeLog.
> diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.14457&r2=1.14458
> http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gdb/dwarf2read.c.
> diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.683&r2=1.684
Did this coommit fix the issue, and can it be closed?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
* [Bug gdb/13498] save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4
2011-12-14 17:21 [Bug gdb/13498] New: save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4 l.lunak at suse dot cz
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2023-12-31 13:08 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
@ 2023-12-31 16:42 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
15 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: tromey at sourceware dot org @ 2023-12-31 16:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-prs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13498
Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |tromey at sourceware dot org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #13 from Tom Tromey <tromey at sourceware dot org> ---
> Did this coommit fix the issue, and can it be closed?
Based on comment #10, I'd say yes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2023-12-31 16:42 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-12-14 17:21 [Bug gdb/13498] New: save-index makes gdb slow with dwarf4 l.lunak at suse dot cz
2011-12-14 23:28 ` [Bug gdb/13498] " l.lunak at suse dot cz
2011-12-15 15:55 ` l.lunak at suse dot cz
2012-02-15 12:12 ` lionel at mamane dot lu
2012-02-16 11:00 ` mjw at redhat dot com
2012-02-17 21:48 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2012-02-17 21:52 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2012-02-20 13:51 ` l.lunak at suse dot cz
2012-02-20 19:51 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2012-02-20 19:55 ` tromey at redhat dot com
2012-02-20 20:57 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-02-21 6:32 ` dje at google dot com
2012-02-21 18:17 ` l.lunak at suse dot cz
2012-07-08 19:35 ` dje at google dot com
2012-07-10 20:29 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-12-31 13:08 ` ssbssa at sourceware dot org
2023-12-31 16:42 ` tromey at sourceware dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).