* Re: my 6.0 todo list
@ 2003-07-17 16:50 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-07-18 6:41 ` Michal Ludvig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2003-07-17 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mludvig; +Cc: ac131313, gdb
Hi Michal,
> Pretty good. Now I have only 34 unexpected failures here.
Would you say that it's in a releasable state then?
You can send me a gdb.log if you want me to scrutinize it.
(Also wondering if this is any use to Andrew, or if I'm just stepping on
his toes).
Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: my 6.0 todo list
2003-07-17 16:50 my 6.0 todo list Michael Elizabeth Chastain
@ 2003-07-18 6:41 ` Michal Ludvig
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Michal Ludvig @ 2003-07-18 6:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain; +Cc: ac131313, gdb
Michael Elizabeth Chastain told me that:
> Hi Michal,
>
>>Pretty good. Now I have only 34 unexpected failures here.
>
> Would you say that it's in a releasable state then?
Yes it is. Many thanks to MarkK who integrated i386 and amd64 targets!
> You can send me a gdb.log if you want me to scrutinize it.
PLease take the recent logs from: http://tmp.logix.cz/amd/gdb/log/
Michal Ludvig
--
* SuSE CR, s.r.o * mludvig@suse.cz
* (+420) 296.545.373 * http://www.suse.cz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: my 6.0 todo list
[not found] <200307171542.LAA13377@smtp.ott.qnx.com>
2003-07-18 13:00 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2003-07-18 22:54 ` Andrew Cagney
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2003-07-18 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alain Magloire; +Cc: gdb
>
> Are the changes non-backward compatible ?
> Did mi2 ever went out in any official release ?
>
> 5.2.1 & 5.3 was -mi 1
>
> Sorry I did not follows the in/out of MI. Feel free to redirect
> to the appropriate README/NEWS.
>
> I need to audit exactly what, in MI land, changed. If there is something lumpy then the following should happen:
>
> cp mi-*.exp mi2-*.exp to `freeze' mi2.
> increment mi2->mi3 in the mainline.
>
> Andrew
Ok, `I remember'.
Post this release, the varobj interfaces will need to be changed so that
it uses frame-id's, and not simple stack addresses, to identify specific
frames. It will fix some nasty edge cases but at the same time (likely)
break compatibility. The old way was simply wrong :-/
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: my 6.0 todo list
@ 2003-07-18 18:57 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2003-07-18 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ezannoni; +Cc: ac131313, gdb
Elena Z writes:
> I'd like to add this to the list of gcc's we test. I hope I'll get a
> chance to do this soon. There is a public branch that is called
> tree-ssa-20020619-branch.
Okay, I tossed tree-ssa-20020619-branch into my scripts for the current
spin.
I have 128 megabytes of memory, and I've got a 175 megabyte cc1plus
running. It's swapping the crap out of my poor IDE disk!
The command is: xgcc libjava/interpreter.cc. Not that it matters. It's
been running for 90 minutes. I expect that it's spending most of its
time banking on the swap partition.
So, anyone who wants to play with the ssa branch, get a machine with 256
megabytes or more of memory (or maybe a 192 megabyte machine and don't
run X or anything else on it).
tree-ssa is going in the "do not care until after gdb 6.0 is release"
category for me.
Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: my 6.0 todo list
[not found] <200307171542.LAA13377@smtp.ott.qnx.com>
@ 2003-07-18 13:00 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-07-18 22:54 ` Andrew Cagney
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2003-07-18 13:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alain Magloire; +Cc: gdb
>>
>> Just fyi,
>>
>> In addition to the usual stuff I need to clear the following backlog:
>>
>> - m32r revival
>> - annotate 3 commit
>> - mi 2->3 switch (needed?)
>
>
> Are the changes non-backward compatible ?
> Did mi2 ever went out in any official release ?
>
> 5.2.1 & 5.3 was -mi 1
>
> Sorry I did not follows the in/out of MI. Feel free to redirect
> to the appropriate README/NEWS.
I need to audit exactly what, in MI land, changed. If there is
something lumpy then the following should happen:
cp mi-*.exp mi2-*.exp to `freeze' mi2.
increment mi2->mi3 in the mainline.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: my 6.0 todo list
@ 2003-07-17 16:47 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2003-07-17 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ezannoni; +Cc: ac131313, gdb
elena> I didn't have a chance to continue on this, sorry.
Mmmm okay ... anyone want to pick up on this? You need a red hat linux
9 box, about 10 gigabytes of disk space, and a 36 hour script run (on
an 800 MHz Celeron with 128 MB memory, will be less if you have a
faster computer).
elena> I'd like to add this to the list of gcc's we test. I hope I'll get a
elena> chance to do this soon. There is a public branch that is called
elena> tree-ssa-20020619-branch.
I'll throw that on my TODO list. In a week or so the report will pop
out.
gcc just left stage 1, which is the stage where they can import branches
into HEAD. They will be in stage 2 for two months (development on HEAD)
followed by stage 3 for two months (bug fixes on HEAD) followed by
cutting gcc-3_4-branch. Then they go back into stage 1 and SSA can be
imported into HEAD while they prepare gcc 3.4.
That's their road map on paper, anyways.
Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: my 6.0 todo list
2003-07-17 15:46 ` Elena Zannoni
@ 2003-07-17 16:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2003-07-17 16:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Elena Zannoni; +Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain, ac131313, gdb
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 11:54:05AM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote:
> Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes:
> > On my list:
> >
> > gdb backtrace bugs
> > http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1250
> > http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1253
> > http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1255
> >
> > dejagnu build issue
> > http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/708
> >
> > red hat linux 9
> > elena z how is it going?
> >
>
> I didn't have a chance to continue on this, sorry.
>
> It occured to me that there is a potential train about to hit us,
> which is the tree-ssa gcc work. Apparently it is going to produce
> really really heavily optimized code, and I am worried abuot how well
> gdb will cope for this.
>
> I'd like to add this to the list of gcc's we test. I hope I'll get a
> chance to do this soon. There is a public branch that is called
> tree-ssa-20020619-branch.
It isn't till 3.5; by then I hope to have... something... anything...
better able to cope than what we have now. The way my luck's been
going we'll have to wait and see.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: my 6.0 todo list
2003-07-17 14:35 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-07-17 15:37 ` Michal Ludvig
@ 2003-07-17 15:46 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-07-17 16:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Elena Zannoni @ 2003-07-17 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain; +Cc: ac131313, gdb
Michael Elizabeth Chastain writes:
> On my list:
>
> gdb backtrace bugs
> http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1250
> http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1253
> http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1255
>
> dejagnu build issue
> http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/708
>
> red hat linux 9
> elena z how is it going?
>
I didn't have a chance to continue on this, sorry.
It occured to me that there is a potential train about to hit us,
which is the tree-ssa gcc work. Apparently it is going to produce
really really heavily optimized code, and I am worried abuot how well
gdb will cope for this.
I'd like to add this to the list of gcc's we test. I hope I'll get a
chance to do this soon. There is a public branch that is called
tree-ssa-20020619-branch.
elena
> Off the top of my head, my test bed isn't producing any regressions
> besides the backtrace bugs. But I won't swear that it is clean until
> I get out the microscope though.
>
> >From my last "5.3 versus HEAD" report,
>
> MI issues
> how is MI these days?
>
> x86-64 regressions
> how is it these days?
>
> multi-register variables
> fixed!
>
> java regression
> fixed!
>
> gcc HEAD -gstabs+
> The nastiest pr, gcc/10055, got fixed in gcc.
>
> There are other regressions with gcc HEAD with both dwarf-2 and
> stabs+ but this does not stop a gdb release.
>
> I will put out a "5.3 versus gdb_6_0-branch" report next week.
> I've been hoping for some of the backtrace bugs to get fixed first.
>
> Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: my 6.0 todo list
2003-07-16 23:38 Andrew Cagney
@ 2003-07-17 15:42 ` Alain Magloire
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Alain Magloire @ 2003-07-17 15:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: gdb
>
> Just fyi,
>
> In addition to the usual stuff I need to clear the following backlog:
>
> - m32r revival
> - annotate 3 commit
> - mi 2->3 switch (needed?)
Are the changes non-backward compatible ?
Did mi2 ever went out in any official release ?
5.2.1 & 5.3 was -mi 1
Sorry I did not follows the in/out of MI. Feel free to redirect
to the appropriate README/NEWS.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: my 6.0 todo list
2003-07-17 14:35 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
@ 2003-07-17 15:37 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-07-17 15:46 ` Elena Zannoni
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Michal Ludvig @ 2003-07-17 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain; +Cc: gdb, ac131313
Michael Elizabeth Chastain told me that:
> x86-64 regressions
> how is it these days?
Pretty good. Now I have only 34 unexpected failures here.
Michal Ludvig
--
* SuSE CR, s.r.o * mludvig@suse.cz
* (+420) 296.545.373 * http://www.suse.cz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: my 6.0 todo list
@ 2003-07-17 14:35 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-07-17 15:37 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-07-17 15:46 ` Elena Zannoni
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2003-07-17 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ac131313, gdb
On my list:
gdb backtrace bugs
http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1250
http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1253
http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/1255
dejagnu build issue
http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/bugs/708
red hat linux 9
elena z how is it going?
Off the top of my head, my test bed isn't producing any regressions
besides the backtrace bugs. But I won't swear that it is clean until
I get out the microscope though.
From my last "5.3 versus HEAD" report,
MI issues
how is MI these days?
x86-64 regressions
how is it these days?
multi-register variables
fixed!
java regression
fixed!
gcc HEAD -gstabs+
The nastiest pr, gcc/10055, got fixed in gcc.
There are other regressions with gcc HEAD with both dwarf-2 and
stabs+ but this does not stop a gdb release.
I will put out a "5.3 versus gdb_6_0-branch" report next week.
I've been hoping for some of the backtrace bugs to get fixed first.
Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* my 6.0 todo list
@ 2003-07-16 23:38 Andrew Cagney
2003-07-17 15:42 ` Alain Magloire
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2003-07-16 23:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb
Just fyi,
In addition to the usual stuff I need to clear the following backlog:
- m32r revival
- annotate 3 commit
- mi 2->3 switch (needed?)
You'll note that none of these are highly technical.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-07-18 22:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-07-17 16:50 my 6.0 todo list Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-07-18 6:41 ` Michal Ludvig
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-07-18 18:57 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
[not found] <200307171542.LAA13377@smtp.ott.qnx.com>
2003-07-18 13:00 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-07-18 22:54 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-07-17 16:47 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-07-17 14:35 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2003-07-17 15:37 ` Michal Ludvig
2003-07-17 15:46 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-07-17 16:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-07-16 23:38 Andrew Cagney
2003-07-17 15:42 ` Alain Magloire
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).