From: Luis Machado <luis.machado@arm.com>
To: "gdb@sourceware.org" <gdb@sourceware.org>
Subject: Any concrete plans after the GDB BoF?
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2022 11:47:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83485199-965e-7ff5-1dc8-d027b74b56f7@arm.com> (raw)
Hi,
Having suggested a few topics for the GDB BoF (I noticed they were discussed, to some extent), are there
any concrete plans from the GDB global maintainers (leadership? I don't know how to call it) to address
some of those concerns?
Simon was kind enough to cleanup the patchworks instance, though that is not yet fully integrated into
something we can easily use to do tests/CI. I see the number of unreviewed patches is growing again.
For example, it is not easy to pick a patch to review. You need to locate the entry in your inbox so you
can reply to it.
On formatting, have we considered the benefit of using clang-format for GDB, therefore potentially saving lots of time
in reviews not having to worry about formatting?
Any other topics?
Thanks!
Luis
next reply other threads:[~2022-10-27 10:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-27 10:47 Luis Machado [this message]
2022-10-28 16:16 ` Simon Marchi
2022-10-28 16:51 ` John Baldwin
2022-10-28 16:54 ` Simon Marchi
2022-10-31 9:28 ` Luis Machado
2022-10-31 13:17 ` Simon Marchi
2022-10-31 13:37 ` Joel Brobecker
2022-10-31 14:15 ` Simon Marchi
2022-10-31 17:31 ` Joel Brobecker
2023-02-11 17:13 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-02-12 12:43 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-02-13 11:54 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-02-13 12:52 ` Luis Machado
2023-02-13 14:24 ` Tom Tromey
2023-02-13 14:42 ` Luis Machado
2023-02-13 15:13 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-02-13 15:23 ` Luis Machado
2023-02-14 5:48 ` Joel Brobecker
2023-02-15 14:47 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-02-16 4:14 ` Joel Brobecker
2023-02-16 9:51 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-02-16 10:16 ` Joel Brobecker
2023-02-16 11:58 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-16 13:31 ` Joel Brobecker
2023-02-16 15:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-14 13:07 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-02-14 14:23 ` Pedro Alves
2023-02-14 13:00 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-02-15 14:36 ` Andrew Burgess
2023-02-13 14:05 ` Tom Tromey
2022-12-15 10:17 ` Luis Machado
2023-01-01 22:02 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-01-20 17:30 ` Tom Tromey
2023-01-20 20:30 ` Tom Tromey
2023-01-27 15:50 ` Lancelot SIX
2023-01-27 23:50 ` Tom Tromey
2023-01-30 17:43 ` Lancelot SIX
2023-01-30 18:46 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-01-30 21:08 ` Tom Tromey
2023-02-04 11:36 ` Mark Wielaard
2023-01-31 10:00 ` Lancelot SIX
2022-12-13 2:48 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2023-02-16 8:53 anix
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83485199-965e-7ff5-1dc8-d027b74b56f7@arm.com \
--to=luis.machado@arm.com \
--cc=gdb@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).