public inbox for glibc-bugs-regex@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug regex/1225] New: unused local variables in regexec.c if _LIBC is not defined
@ 2005-08-21 0:40 eggert at gnu dot org
2005-08-21 0:40 ` [Bug regex/1225] " eggert at gnu dot org
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: eggert at gnu dot org @ 2005-08-21 0:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs-regex
The attached patch is taken from coreutils, which uses it to avoid
unused-local-variable warnings when compiling regexec.c.
--
Summary: unused local variables in regexec.c if _LIBC is not
defined
Product: glibc
Version: 2.3.5
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: regex
AssignedTo: gotom at debian dot or dot jp
ReportedBy: eggert at gnu dot org
CC: glibc-bugs-regex at sources dot redhat dot com,glibc-
bugs at sources dot redhat dot com
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1225
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug regex/1225] unused local variables in regexec.c if _LIBC is not defined
2005-08-21 0:40 [Bug regex/1225] New: unused local variables in regexec.c if _LIBC is not defined eggert at gnu dot org
@ 2005-08-21 0:40 ` eggert at gnu dot org
2005-09-06 18:41 ` drepper at redhat dot com
2006-04-25 18:18 ` drepper at redhat dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: eggert at gnu dot org @ 2005-08-21 0:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs-regex
------- Additional Comments From eggert at gnu dot org 2005-08-21 00:40 -------
Created an attachment (id=603)
--> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=603&action=view)
avoid uninitialized-variable warnings
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1225
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug regex/1225] unused local variables in regexec.c if _LIBC is not defined
2005-08-21 0:40 [Bug regex/1225] New: unused local variables in regexec.c if _LIBC is not defined eggert at gnu dot org
2005-08-21 0:40 ` [Bug regex/1225] " eggert at gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-06 18:41 ` drepper at redhat dot com
2006-04-25 18:18 ` drepper at redhat dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2005-09-06 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs-regex
------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2005-09-06 18:41 -------
This isn't necessarily correct. If, as suggested in another bug, the
__libc_loc_* definitions are moved into a separate file where they are defined
by the project using the code, then there can be locking operations defined.
The correct way to do this is define a macro which indicates locking is used.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1225
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug regex/1225] unused local variables in regexec.c if _LIBC is not defined
2005-08-21 0:40 [Bug regex/1225] New: unused local variables in regexec.c if _LIBC is not defined eggert at gnu dot org
2005-08-21 0:40 ` [Bug regex/1225] " eggert at gnu dot org
2005-09-06 18:41 ` drepper at redhat dot com
@ 2006-04-25 18:18 ` drepper at redhat dot com
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2006-04-25 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: glibc-bugs-regex
------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2006-04-25 18:18 -------
No reply in 6+ months. Closing.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1225
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-04-25 18:18 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-08-21 0:40 [Bug regex/1225] New: unused local variables in regexec.c if _LIBC is not defined eggert at gnu dot org
2005-08-21 0:40 ` [Bug regex/1225] " eggert at gnu dot org
2005-09-06 18:41 ` drepper at redhat dot com
2006-04-25 18:18 ` drepper at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).