public inbox for glibc-bugs-regex@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug regex/1225] New: unused local variables in regexec.c if _LIBC is not defined @ 2005-08-21 0:40 eggert at gnu dot org 2005-08-21 0:40 ` [Bug regex/1225] " eggert at gnu dot org ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: eggert at gnu dot org @ 2005-08-21 0:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs-regex The attached patch is taken from coreutils, which uses it to avoid unused-local-variable warnings when compiling regexec.c. -- Summary: unused local variables in regexec.c if _LIBC is not defined Product: glibc Version: 2.3.5 Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: regex AssignedTo: gotom at debian dot or dot jp ReportedBy: eggert at gnu dot org CC: glibc-bugs-regex at sources dot redhat dot com,glibc- bugs at sources dot redhat dot com http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1225 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug regex/1225] unused local variables in regexec.c if _LIBC is not defined 2005-08-21 0:40 [Bug regex/1225] New: unused local variables in regexec.c if _LIBC is not defined eggert at gnu dot org @ 2005-08-21 0:40 ` eggert at gnu dot org 2005-09-06 18:41 ` drepper at redhat dot com 2006-04-25 18:18 ` drepper at redhat dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: eggert at gnu dot org @ 2005-08-21 0:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs-regex ------- Additional Comments From eggert at gnu dot org 2005-08-21 00:40 ------- Created an attachment (id=603) --> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=603&action=view) avoid uninitialized-variable warnings -- http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1225 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug regex/1225] unused local variables in regexec.c if _LIBC is not defined 2005-08-21 0:40 [Bug regex/1225] New: unused local variables in regexec.c if _LIBC is not defined eggert at gnu dot org 2005-08-21 0:40 ` [Bug regex/1225] " eggert at gnu dot org @ 2005-09-06 18:41 ` drepper at redhat dot com 2006-04-25 18:18 ` drepper at redhat dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2005-09-06 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs-regex ------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2005-09-06 18:41 ------- This isn't necessarily correct. If, as suggested in another bug, the __libc_loc_* definitions are moved into a separate file where they are defined by the project using the code, then there can be locking operations defined. The correct way to do this is define a macro which indicates locking is used. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1225 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug regex/1225] unused local variables in regexec.c if _LIBC is not defined 2005-08-21 0:40 [Bug regex/1225] New: unused local variables in regexec.c if _LIBC is not defined eggert at gnu dot org 2005-08-21 0:40 ` [Bug regex/1225] " eggert at gnu dot org 2005-09-06 18:41 ` drepper at redhat dot com @ 2006-04-25 18:18 ` drepper at redhat dot com 2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread From: drepper at redhat dot com @ 2006-04-25 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: glibc-bugs-regex ------- Additional Comments From drepper at redhat dot com 2006-04-25 18:18 ------- No reply in 6+ months. Closing. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1225 ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2006-04-25 18:18 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-08-21 0:40 [Bug regex/1225] New: unused local variables in regexec.c if _LIBC is not defined eggert at gnu dot org 2005-08-21 0:40 ` [Bug regex/1225] " eggert at gnu dot org 2005-09-06 18:41 ` drepper at redhat dot com 2006-04-25 18:18 ` drepper at redhat dot com
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).