* current version from CVS fails build
@ 2003-01-29 19:33 Fred Fish
2003-01-29 19:37 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Fred Fish @ 2003-01-29 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: insight; +Cc: fnf
For the last few days, the latest version from the CVS repository has been
failing to build for me. The error is:
make[2]: Entering directory `/links/build/sourceware/gdb/T-i686-pc-linux-gnu/tix/unix'
/bin/sh: line 1: cd: tk8.4: No such file or directory
This is coming from the following in tix/unix/Makefile:
# CYGNUS LOCAL: Just recur for most targets:
SUBDIR = tk8.4
all test:
@cd $(SUBDIR) && $(MAKE) $@
and there is no tk8.4 subdir.
-Fred
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: current version from CVS fails build
2003-01-29 19:33 current version from CVS fails build Fred Fish
@ 2003-01-29 19:37 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-01-29 19:49 ` Fred Fish
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2003-01-29 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: fnf; +Cc: insight
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 12:35:23PM -0700, Fred Fish wrote:
>For the last few days, the latest version from the CVS repository has been
>failing to build for me. The error is:
>
> make[2]: Entering directory `/links/build/sourceware/gdb/T-i686-pc-linux-gnu/tix/unix'
> /bin/sh: line 1: cd: tk8.4: No such file or directory
>
>This is coming from the following in tix/unix/Makefile:
>
> # CYGNUS LOCAL: Just recur for most targets:
>
> SUBDIR = tk8.4
>
> all test:
> @cd $(SUBDIR) && $(MAKE) $@
>
>and there is no tk8.4 subdir.
tix has been obsoleted so you should just remove the directory.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: current version from CVS fails build
2003-01-29 19:37 ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2003-01-29 19:49 ` Fred Fish
2003-01-29 19:52 ` Keith Seitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Fred Fish @ 2003-01-29 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christopher Faylor; +Cc: fnf, insight
> tix has been obsoleted so you should just remove the directory.
OK, I'll give that a try.
BTW, note that it is still in the modules file:
insight -a naked-gdb-guifull gdb-support \
naked-tcl naked-tk naked-itcl naked-tix naked-libgui
insight+dejagnu -a insight naked-dejagnu naked-expect
-Fred
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: current version from CVS fails build
2003-01-29 19:49 ` Fred Fish
@ 2003-01-29 19:52 ` Keith Seitz
2003-01-29 20:09 ` Fred Fish
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Keith Seitz @ 2003-01-29 19:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fred Fish; +Cc: Chris Faylor, insight
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 11:51, Fred Fish wrote:
> > tix has been obsoleted so you should just remove the directory.
>
> OK, I'll give that a try.
>
> BTW, note that it is still in the modules file:
>
> insight -a naked-gdb-guifull gdb-support \
> naked-tcl naked-tk naked-itcl naked-tix naked-libgui
> insight+dejagnu -a insight naked-dejagnu naked-expect
>
Sadly, I don't think it'll ever go away. Mumble something about someone
wanting to build some obscure version of Insight.
Anyway, with the recent configure changes, I don't see why we can't
whack tix from that at the very least...
Keith
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: current version from CVS fails build
2003-01-29 19:52 ` Keith Seitz
@ 2003-01-29 20:09 ` Fred Fish
2003-01-29 20:41 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Fred Fish @ 2003-01-29 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keith Seitz; +Cc: Fred Fish, Chris Faylor, insight
> Sadly, I don't think it'll ever go away. Mumble something about someone
> wanting to build some obscure version of Insight.
Couldn't we do "cvs rm -f tix" to remove it from the top of the
tree while still keeping it available for previously tagged
checkouts?
-Fred
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: current version from CVS fails build
2003-01-29 20:09 ` Fred Fish
@ 2003-01-29 20:41 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 20:45 ` Mo DeJong
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2003-01-29 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fred Fish; +Cc: Keith Seitz, Chris Faylor, insight
>> Sadly, I don't think it'll ever go away. Mumble something about someone
>> wanting to build some obscure version of Insight.
>
>
> Couldn't we do "cvs rm -f tix" to remove it from the top of the
> tree while still keeping it available for previously tagged
> checkouts?
Hmm,
The reason for not removing it was source navigator. Didn't that
project move its repository?
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: current version from CVS fails build
2003-01-29 20:41 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2003-01-29 20:45 ` Mo DeJong
2003-01-29 20:48 ` Keith Seitz
2003-01-29 20:54 ` Christopher Faylor
2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Mo DeJong @ 2003-01-29 20:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: insight
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 15:41:52 -0500
Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> wrote:
> The reason for not removing it was source navigator. Didn't that
> project move its repository?
Go ahead and remove it. SN was using the tcl/tk modules from sources,
but because of the 8.4 upgrade that will no longer be possible.
cheers
Mo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: current version from CVS fails build
2003-01-29 20:41 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 20:45 ` Mo DeJong
@ 2003-01-29 20:48 ` Keith Seitz
2003-01-29 20:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 20:54 ` Christopher Faylor
2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Keith Seitz @ 2003-01-29 20:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: Fred Fish, Chris Faylor, insight
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 12:41, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> Hmm,
>
> The reason for not removing it was source navigator. Didn't that
> project move its repository?
All the links in the SN page on sources.redhat.com point to sourceforge.
Although the download page (on sourceforge) does mention a CVS
repository at sources.redhat.com, it also mentions one at
sourceforge.net. I suspect that the recent tcl/tk 8.4 upgrade may have
screwed them over. I hope that this was discussed between the groups.
(Alas, I don't recall anything.)
Of course, I still don't understand why insight's module list must
contain tix. We're done with it (at long last).
Keith
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: current version from CVS fails build
2003-01-29 20:41 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 20:45 ` Mo DeJong
2003-01-29 20:48 ` Keith Seitz
@ 2003-01-29 20:54 ` Christopher Faylor
2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2003-01-29 20:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: Fred Fish, Keith Seitz, insight
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 03:41:52PM -0500, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>>>Sadly, I don't think it'll ever go away. Mumble something about someone
>>>wanting to build some obscure version of Insight.
>>
>>
>>Couldn't we do "cvs rm -f tix" to remove it from the top of the
>>tree while still keeping it available for previously tagged
>>checkouts?
>
>Hmm,
>
>The reason for not removing it was source navigator. Didn't that
>project move its repository?
yes.
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: current version from CVS fails build
2003-01-29 20:48 ` Keith Seitz
@ 2003-01-29 20:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 21:00 ` Keith Seitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2003-01-29 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Keith Seitz; +Cc: Fred Fish, Chris Faylor, insight
> On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 12:41, Andrew Cagney wrote:
>
>> Hmm,
>>
>> The reason for not removing it was source navigator. Didn't that
>> project move its repository?
>
>
> All the links in the SN page on sources.redhat.com point to sourceforge.
> Although the download page (on sourceforge) does mention a CVS
> repository at sources.redhat.com, it also mentions one at
> sourceforge.net. I suspect that the recent tcl/tk 8.4 upgrade may have
> screwed them over. I hope that this was discussed between the groups.
> (Alas, I don't recall anything.)
>
> Of course, I still don't understand why insight's module list must
> contain tix. We're done with it (at long last).
The 5.3 branch and earlier haven't done with it. Removing would mean
not being able to fully check out an older version of insight (it would
also break my release process) :-(
The correct way to remove it is, as Fred suggested, cvs rm ....
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: current version from CVS fails build
2003-01-29 20:57 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2003-01-29 21:00 ` Keith Seitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Keith Seitz @ 2003-01-29 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Cagney; +Cc: Fred Fish, Chris Faylor, insight
On Wed, 2003-01-29 at 12:56, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> The 5.3 branch and earlier haven't done with it. Removing would mean
> not being able to fully check out an older version of insight (it would
> also break my release process) :-(
Duh. That's right. I'll get it straight one of these days. :-)
> The correct way to remove it is, as Fred suggested, cvs rm ....
Hmm. Okay. I'll make note to do that by end of the week.
Keith
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-01-29 21:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-01-29 19:33 current version from CVS fails build Fred Fish
2003-01-29 19:37 ` Christopher Faylor
2003-01-29 19:49 ` Fred Fish
2003-01-29 19:52 ` Keith Seitz
2003-01-29 20:09 ` Fred Fish
2003-01-29 20:41 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 20:45 ` Mo DeJong
2003-01-29 20:48 ` Keith Seitz
2003-01-29 20:57 ` Andrew Cagney
2003-01-29 21:00 ` Keith Seitz
2003-01-29 20:54 ` Christopher Faylor
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).