[Bug classpath/29304] autoconf should be used in libjava to check for fabs, fabsf and scalbn

[Bug classpath/29304] autoconf should be used in libjava to check for fabs, fabsf and scalbn

[egallager at gcc dot gnu.org]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29304

--- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew John Hughes from comment #3)
> No, this is a Classpath bug. Nothing to do with GCJ.

Does it make sense for Classpath and GCC to continue to share a bugzilla these
days? This is far from the only time I've been confused by it... would it be
possible to split them into 2 separate bug databases?
>From java-prs-return-12233-listarch-java-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Wed Jan 02 21:48:55 2019
Return-Path: <java-prs-return-12233-listarch-java-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 47297 invoked by alias); 2 Jan 2019 21:48:55 -0000
Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <java-prs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-prs-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:java-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 47245 invoked by uid 48); 2 Jan 2019 21:48:54 -0000
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug classpath/29304] autoconf should be used in libjava to check
 for fabs, fabsf and scalbn
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2019 21:48:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: classpath
X-Bugzilla-Component: classpath
X-Bugzilla-Version: 0.15
X-Bugzilla-Keywords:
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution:
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-29304-8172-nVLJRmpLVF@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-29304-8172@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-29304-8172@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-q1/txt/msg00001.txt.bz2
Content-length: 835

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29304

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andrew John Hughes from comment #3)
> > No, this is a Classpath bug. Nothing to do with GCJ.
> 
> Does it make sense for Classpath and GCC to continue to share a bugzilla
> these days? This is far from the only time I've been confused by it... would
> it be possible to split them into 2 separate bug databases?

I am less confused by the sharing because I know the history (I was one of the
folks who prompted the sharing).  I don't think it hurts having the classpath
in GCC's bugzilla and I normally monitor classpath's bug list for accidental
usage there (there was one today but it only happens once every two months so
it is low traffic).
>From java-prs-return-12234-listarch-java-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Fri Dec 20 22:46:29 2019
Return-Path: <java-prs-return-12234-listarch-java-prs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 69829 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2019 22:46:28 -0000
Mailing-List: contact java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <java-prs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:java-prs-subscribe@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-prs/>
List-Post: <mailto:java-prs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:java-prs-help@gcc.gnu.org>, <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: java-prs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 69807 invoked by uid 48); 20 Dec 2019 22:46:28 -0000
From: "redi at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: java-prs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug java/64044] Java emits bogus .class$ decls
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 22:46:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: java
X-Bugzilla-Version: 5.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields:
Message-ID: <bug-64044-8172-3TbbqU8odA@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-64044-8172@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-64044-8172@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2019-q4/txt/msg00000.txt.bz2
Content-length: 137

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64044

--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed by r218018

[Bug classpath/29304] autoconf should be used in libjava to check for fabs, fabsf and scalbn

[howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu]

------- Comment #1 from howarth at nitro dot med dot uc dot edu  2006-10-01 04:17 -------
We will also need to add...

AC_CHECK_LIB([m],[fabsf],[AC_DEFINE([HAVE_FABSF],[1],[libm includes fabsf])])
AC_CHECK_LIB([m],[fabs],[AC_DEFINE([HAVE_FABS],[1],[libm includes fabs])])
AC_CHECK_LIB([m],[scalbn],[AC_DEFINE([HAVE_SCALBN],[1],[libm includes
scalbn])])

to configure.ac in libjava.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29304