* Is GCJ still active? @ 2012-02-05 18:34 孙波翔 2012-02-06 18:18 ` Andrew Haley 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: 孙波翔 @ 2012-02-05 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: java Hi there! Thank you to read the email. I am doing a project(open source) and need to complie some java *.class files to *.dll and *.so files so that this files can run without jre. I found there only have to tools can do it: Jet and GCJ. Jet is not under GPL license. And the latest release of GCJ was on Sep 22, 2009. I need to compile the java files and support JDK 1.7 features. So does GCJ still active and may support JDK 1.7 in future? Or could you suggest some other tools can do it? Thanks again! Waiting for your reply. Sun ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Is GCJ still active? 2012-02-05 18:34 Is GCJ still active? 孙波翔 @ 2012-02-06 18:18 ` Andrew Haley [not found] ` <CABDGE0Us+oVvzVEuuEABqnw+heAwbEzLhWeUdK6g-2LVAHAMHQ@mail.gmail.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Andrew Haley @ 2012-02-06 18:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: java On 02/05/2012 06:33 PM, åæ³¢ç¿ wrote: > I am doing a project(open source) and need to complie some java > *.class files to *.dll and *.so files so that this files can run > without jre. > > I found there only have to tools can do it: Jet and GCJ. > > Jet is not under GPL license. And the latest release of GCJ was on Sep > 22, 2009. I need to compile the java files and support JDK 1.7 > features. So does GCJ still active and may support JDK 1.7 in future? gcj ahas been released several times since then. There is a little development still going on, but at present there are no plans to do a release that supports Java 1.7 features. Andrew. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CABDGE0Us+oVvzVEuuEABqnw+heAwbEzLhWeUdK6g-2LVAHAMHQ@mail.gmail.com>]
* Is GCJ still active? [not found] ` <CABDGE0Us+oVvzVEuuEABqnw+heAwbEzLhWeUdK6g-2LVAHAMHQ@mail.gmail.com> @ 2012-02-06 18:41 ` Harpal Grover 2012-02-06 18:49 ` Andrew Haley 2012-02-06 18:56 ` Joel Dice 0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Harpal Grover @ 2012-02-06 18:41 UTC (permalink / raw) To: GCC On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 02/05/2012 06:33 PM, 孙波翔 wrote: > > > I am doing a project(open source) and need to complie some java > > *.class files to *.dll and *.so files so that this files can run > > without jre. > > > > I found there only have to tools can do it: Jet and GCJ. > > > > Jet is not under GPL license. And the latest release of GCJ was on Sep > > 22, 2009. I need to compile the java files and support JDK 1.7 > > features. So does GCJ still active and may support JDK 1.7 in future? > > gcj ahas been released several times since then. There is a little > development still going on, but at present there are no plans to do > a release that supports Java 1.7 features. > > Andrew. So naturally, the next question then would be: Will there be any capabilities to compile java applications to native binaries using the OpenJDK? If not, who should we contact to convey the ever so popular and growing interest in being able to do this for Linux, OS X and Windows? -- Harpal Grover President Harpal Grover Consulting Inc ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Is GCJ still active? 2012-02-06 18:41 ` Harpal Grover @ 2012-02-06 18:49 ` Andrew Haley 2012-02-06 18:56 ` Joel Dice 1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Andrew Haley @ 2012-02-06 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: java On 02/06/2012 06:41 PM, Harpal Grover wrote: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On 02/05/2012 06:33 PM, åæ³¢ç¿ wrote: >> >>> I am doing a project(open source) and need to complie some java >>> *.class files to *.dll and *.so files so that this files can run >>> without jre. >>> >>> I found there only have to tools can do it: Jet and GCJ. >>> >>> Jet is not under GPL license. And the latest release of GCJ was on Sep >>> 22, 2009. I need to compile the java files and support JDK 1.7 >>> features. So does GCJ still active and may support JDK 1.7 in future? >> >> gcj ahas been released several times since then. There is a little >> development still going on, but at present there are no plans to do >> a release that supports Java 1.7 features. > > > So naturally, the next question then would be: > > Will there be any capabilities to compile java applications to native > binaries using the OpenJDK? Never say never, but I am not aware of any such thing. > If not, who should we contact to convey the ever so popular and > growing interest in being able to do this for Linux, OS X and > Windows? I'm not sure. I suppose the key question is how much mone you are prepared to spend, but that's probably off-topic for this list. There are some areas in which a precompiler like gcj is advantageous, but they are fairly specialized. Andrew. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Is GCJ still active? 2012-02-06 18:41 ` Harpal Grover 2012-02-06 18:49 ` Andrew Haley @ 2012-02-06 18:56 ` Joel Dice 2012-02-07 20:36 ` lucianomanzo 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Joel Dice @ 2012-02-06 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Harpal Grover; +Cc: GCC [-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 1354 bytes --] On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Harpal Grover wrote: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> On 02/05/2012 06:33 PM, åæ³¢ç¿ wrote: >> >>> I am doing a project(open source) and need to complie some java >>> *.class files to *.dll and *.so files so that this files can run >>> without jre. >>> >>> I found there only have to tools can do it: Jet and GCJ. >>> >>> Jet is not under GPL license. And the latest release of GCJ was on Sep >>> 22, 2009. I need to compile the java files and support JDK 1.7 >>> features. So does GCJ still active and may support JDK 1.7 in future? >> >> gcj ahas been released several times since then.  There is a little >> development still going on, but at present there are no plans to do >> a release that supports Java 1.7 features. >> >> Andrew. > > > So naturally, the next question then would be: > > Will there be any capabilities to compile java applications to native > binaries using the OpenJDK? If not, who should we contact to convey > the ever so popular and growing interest in being able to do this for > Linux, OS X and Windows? Avian[1] will do this well enough to run e.g. Eclipse, Tomcat, Jython, etc., but I haven't tested any Swing/AWT apps yet. OpenJDK 6 is supported, and I've just started on a OpenJDK 7 port. * [1] http://oss.readytalk.com/avian/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Is GCJ still active? 2012-02-06 18:56 ` Joel Dice @ 2012-02-07 20:36 ` lucianomanzo 2012-02-07 20:57 ` Joel Dice 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: lucianomanzo @ 2012-02-07 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: java Hi Joel, Congratulations for this excellent project!! If I understend, it's possible to compile java code to binary code? A SWT application runs with avian? Thank you On 06-02-2012 16:56, Joel Dice wrote: > On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Harpal Grover wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 02/05/2012 06:33 PM, åæ³¢ç¿ wrote: >>> >>>> I am doing a project(open source) and need to complie some java >>>> *.class files to *.dll and *.so files so that this files can run >>>> without jre. >>>> >>>> I found there only have to tools can do it: Jet and GCJ. >>>> >>>> Jet is not under GPL license. And the latest release of GCJ was on Sep >>>> 22, 2009. I need to compile the java files and support JDK 1.7 >>>> features. So does GCJ still active and may support JDK 1.7 in future? >>> >>> gcj ahas been released several times since then. There is a little >>> development still going on, but at present there are no plans to do >>> a release that supports Java 1.7 features. >>> >>> Andrew. >> >> >> So naturally, the next question then would be: >> >> Will there be any capabilities to compile java applications to native >> binaries using the OpenJDK? If not, who should we contact to convey >> the ever so popular and growing interest in being able to do this for >> Linux, OS X and Windows? > > Avian[1] will do this well enough to run e.g. Eclipse, Tomcat, Jython, > etc., but I haven't tested any Swing/AWT apps yet. OpenJDK 6 is > supported, and I've just started on a OpenJDK 7 port. > > * [1] http://oss.readytalk.com/avian/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: Is GCJ still active? 2012-02-07 20:36 ` lucianomanzo @ 2012-02-07 20:57 ` Joel Dice 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Joel Dice @ 2012-02-07 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw) To: lucianomanzo; +Cc: java [-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2059 bytes --] On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, lucianomanzo wrote: > Hi Joel, > > Congratulations for this excellent project!! > > If I understend, it's possible to compile java code to binary code? Yes, Avian supports either JIT (just-in-time) or AOT (ahead-of-time) compilation to machine code, or a mix of both. > A SWT application runs with avian? Yes. Please direct any further questions or comments about Avian to avian@googlegroups.com, since they're off-topic for this list. Thanks. > > Thank you > > On 06-02-2012 16:56, Joel Dice wrote: >> On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Harpal Grover wrote: >> >> > On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Andrew Haley <aph@redhat.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > On 02/05/2012 06:33 PM, åæ³¢ç¿ wrote: >> > > >> > > > I am doing a project(open source) and need to complie some java >> > > > *.class files to *.dll and *.so files so that this files can run >> > > > without jre. >> > > > >> > > > I found there only have to tools can do it: Jet and GCJ. >> > > > >> > > > Jet is not under GPL license. And the latest release of GCJ was on >> > > > Sep >> > > > 22, 2009. I need to compile the java files and support JDK 1.7 >> > > > features. So does GCJ still active and may support JDK 1.7 in >> > > > future? >> > > >> > > gcj ahas been released several times since then. There is a little >> > > development still going on, but at present there are no plans to do >> > > a release that supports Java 1.7 features. >> > > >> > > Andrew. >> > >> > >> > So naturally, the next question then would be: >> > >> > Will there be any capabilities to compile java applications to native >> > binaries using the OpenJDK? If not, who should we contact to convey >> > the ever so popular and growing interest in being able to do this for >> > Linux, OS X and Windows? >> >> Avian[1] will do this well enough to run e.g. Eclipse, Tomcat, Jython, >> etc., but I haven't tested any Swing/AWT apps yet. OpenJDK 6 is >> supported, and I've just started on a OpenJDK 7 port. >> >> * [1] http://oss.readytalk.com/avian/ > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-07 20:57 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2012-02-05 18:34 Is GCJ still active? 孙波翔 2012-02-06 18:18 ` Andrew Haley [not found] ` <CABDGE0Us+oVvzVEuuEABqnw+heAwbEzLhWeUdK6g-2LVAHAMHQ@mail.gmail.com> 2012-02-06 18:41 ` Harpal Grover 2012-02-06 18:49 ` Andrew Haley 2012-02-06 18:56 ` Joel Dice 2012-02-07 20:36 ` lucianomanzo 2012-02-07 20:57 ` Joel Dice
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).