[PATCH][gcc] libgccjit: introduce gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option

[PATCH][gcc] libgccjit: introduce gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option

[Andrea Corallo]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1887 bytes --]

Hi all,
Second version of the patch addressing David's comment about all-non-failing-tests.h

Adds gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option to the libgccjit ABI and a testcase for it.

Using this interface is now possible to pass options affecting assembler and linker.

Does not introduce regressions running make check-jit

Bests

  Andrea


gcc/jit/ChangeLog
2019-01-16  Andrea Corallo  andrea.corallo@arm.com

* docs/topics/compatibility.rst (LIBGCCJIT_ABI_11): New ABI tag.
* docs/topics/contexts.rst (Additional driver options): New
section.
* jit-playback.c (invoke_driver): Add call to append_driver_options.
* jit-recording.c: Within namespace gcc::jit...
(recording::context::~context): Free the optnames within
m_driver_options.
(recording::context::add_driver_option): New method.
(recording::context::append_driver_options): New method.
(recording::context::dump_reproducer_to_file): Add driver
options.
* jit-recording.h: Within namespace gcc::jit...
(recording::context::add_driver_option): New method.
(recording::context::append_driver_options): New method.
(recording::context::m_driver_options): New field.
* libgccjit++.h (gccjit::context::add_driver_option): New
method.
* libgccjit.c (gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option): New API
entrypoint.
* libgccjit.h (gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option): New API
entrypoint.
(LIBGCCJIT_HAVE_gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option): New
macro.
* libgccjit.map (LIBGCCJIT_ABI_11): New ABI tag.



gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2019-01-16  Andrea Corallo  andrea.corallo@arm.com

* jit.dg/add-driver-options-testlib.c: Add support file for
test-add-driver-options.c testcase.
* jit.dg/all-non-failing-tests.h: Add note about
test-add-driver-options.c
* jit.dg/jit.exp (jit-dg-test): Update to support
add-driver-options-testlib.c compilation.
* jit.dg/test-add-driver-options.c: New testcase.


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option_no_changelog.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff; name="gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option_no_changelog.patch", Size: 12673 bytes --]

diff --git a/gcc/jit/docs/topics/compatibility.rst b/gcc/jit/docs/topics/compatibility.rst
index 38d338b..abefa56 100644
--- a/gcc/jit/docs/topics/compatibility.rst
+++ b/gcc/jit/docs/topics/compatibility.rst
@@ -168,6 +168,12 @@ entrypoints:
 
 ``LIBGCCJIT_ABI_10``
 --------------------
-
 ``LIBGCCJIT_ABI_10`` covers the addition of
 :func:`gcc_jit_context_new_rvalue_from_vector`
+
+.. _LIBGCCJIT_ABI_11:
+
+``LIBGCCJIT_ABI_11``
+--------------------
+``LIBGCCJIT_ABI_11`` covers the addition of
+:func:`gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option`
diff --git a/gcc/jit/docs/topics/contexts.rst b/gcc/jit/docs/topics/contexts.rst
index 95964ca..2f8aeb7 100644
--- a/gcc/jit/docs/topics/contexts.rst
+++ b/gcc/jit/docs/topics/contexts.rst
@@ -546,3 +546,36 @@ Additional command-line options
    .. code-block:: c
 
       #ifdef LIBGCCJIT_HAVE_gcc_jit_context_add_command_line_option
+
+.. function:: void gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option (gcc_jit_context *ctxt,\
+						      const char *optname)
+
+   Add an arbitrary gcc driver option to the context, for use by
+   :func:`gcc_jit_context_compile` and
+   :func:`gcc_jit_context_compile_to_file`.
+
+   The parameter ``optname`` must be non-NULL.  The underlying buffer is
+   copied, so that it does not need to outlive the call.
+
+   Extra options added by `gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option` are
+   applied *after* all other options potentially overriding them.
+   Options from parent contexts are inherited by child contexts; options
+   from the parent are applied *before* those from the child.
+
+   For example:
+
+   .. code-block:: c
+
+      gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option (ctxt, "-lm");
+      gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option (ctxt, "-fuse-linker-plugin");
+
+   Note that only some options are likely to be meaningful; there is no
+   "frontend" within libgccjit, so typically only those affecting
+   assembler and linker are likely to be useful.
+
+   This entrypoint was added in :ref:`LIBGCCJIT_ABI_11`; you can test for
+   its presence using
+
+   .. code-block:: c
+
+      #ifdef LIBGCCJIT_HAVE_gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option
diff --git a/gcc/jit/jit-playback.c b/gcc/jit/jit-playback.c
index 86f588d..b74495c 100644
--- a/gcc/jit/jit-playback.c
+++ b/gcc/jit/jit-playback.c
@@ -2459,6 +2459,10 @@ invoke_driver (const char *ctxt_progname,
   if (0)
     ADD_ARG ("-v");
 
+  /* Add any user-provided driver extra options.  */
+
+  m_recording_ctxt->append_driver_options (&argvec);
+
 #undef ADD_ARG
 
   /* pex_one's error-handling requires pname to be non-NULL.  */
diff --git a/gcc/jit/jit-recording.c b/gcc/jit/jit-recording.c
index 04cc6a6..8ffd0d4 100644
--- a/gcc/jit/jit-recording.c
+++ b/gcc/jit/jit-recording.c
@@ -616,6 +616,8 @@ recording::context::~context ()
   char *optname;
   FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (m_command_line_options, i, optname)
     free (optname);
+  FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (m_driver_options, i, optname)
+    free (optname);
 
   if (m_builtins_manager)
     delete m_builtins_manager;
@@ -1307,6 +1309,31 @@ recording::context::append_command_line_options (vec <char *> *argvec)
     argvec->safe_push (xstrdup (optname));
 }
 
+/* Add the given optname to this context's list of extra driver options.  */
+
+void
+recording::context::add_driver_option (const char *optname)
+{
+  m_driver_options.safe_push (xstrdup (optname));
+}
+
+/* Add any user-provided driver options, starting with any from
+   parent contexts.
+   Called by playback::context::invoke_driver.  */
+
+void
+recording::context::append_driver_options (auto_string_vec *argvec)
+{
+  if (m_parent_ctxt)
+    m_parent_ctxt->append_driver_options (argvec);
+
+  int i;
+  char *optname;
+
+  FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (m_driver_options, i, optname)
+    argvec->safe_push (xstrdup (optname));
+}
+
 /* Add the given dumpname/out_ptr pair to this context's list of requested
    dumps.
 
@@ -1799,6 +1826,17 @@ recording::context::dump_reproducer_to_file (const char *path)
 		     optname);
 	}
 
+      if (!m_driver_options.is_empty ())
+	{
+	  int i;
+	  char *optname;
+	  r.write ("  /* User-provided driver options.  */\n");
+	  FOR_EACH_VEC_ELT (m_driver_options, i, optname)
+	    r.write ("  gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option (%s, \"%s\");\n",
+		     r.get_identifier (contexts[ctxt_idx]),
+		     optname);
+	}
+
       if (m_requested_dumps.length ())
 	{
 	  r.write ("  /* Requested dumps.  */\n");
diff --git a/gcc/jit/jit-recording.h b/gcc/jit/jit-recording.h
index b9c6544..b9f2250 100644
--- a/gcc/jit/jit-recording.h
+++ b/gcc/jit/jit-recording.h
@@ -218,6 +218,12 @@ public:
   append_command_line_options (vec <char *> *argvec);
 
   void
+  add_driver_option (const char *optname);
+
+  void
+  append_driver_options (auto_string_vec *argvec);
+
+  void
   enable_dump (const char *dumpname,
 	       char **out_ptr);
 
@@ -317,6 +323,7 @@ private:
   bool m_bool_options[GCC_JIT_NUM_BOOL_OPTIONS];
   bool m_inner_bool_options[NUM_INNER_BOOL_OPTIONS];
   auto_vec <char *> m_command_line_options;
+  auto_vec <char *> m_driver_options;
 
   /* Dumpfiles that were requested via gcc_jit_context_enable_dump.  */
   auto_vec<requested_dump> m_requested_dumps;
diff --git a/gcc/jit/libgccjit++.h b/gcc/jit/libgccjit++.h
index 5c2bd2d..55aebca 100644
--- a/gcc/jit/libgccjit++.h
+++ b/gcc/jit/libgccjit++.h
@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ namespace gccjit
     void set_bool_use_external_driver (int bool_value);
 
     void add_command_line_option (const char *optname);
+    void add_driver_option (const char *optname);
 
     void set_timer (gccjit::timer t);
     gccjit::timer get_timer () const;
@@ -687,6 +688,12 @@ context::add_command_line_option (const char *optname)
 }
 
 inline void
+context::add_driver_option (const char *optname)
+{
+  gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option (m_inner_ctxt, optname);
+}
+
+inline void
 context::set_timer (gccjit::timer t)
 {
   gcc_jit_context_set_timer (m_inner_ctxt, t.get_inner_timer ());
diff --git a/gcc/jit/libgccjit.c b/gcc/jit/libgccjit.c
index de7fb25..e4f17f8 100644
--- a/gcc/jit/libgccjit.c
+++ b/gcc/jit/libgccjit.c
@@ -2644,6 +2644,25 @@ gcc_jit_context_add_command_line_option (gcc_jit_context *ctxt,
 
 /* Public entrypoint.  See description in libgccjit.h.
 
+   The real work is done by the
+   gcc::jit::recording::context::add_driver_option method in
+   jit-recording.c.  */
+
+void
+gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option (gcc_jit_context *ctxt,
+				   const char *optname)
+{
+  RETURN_IF_FAIL (ctxt, NULL, NULL, "NULL context");
+  JIT_LOG_FUNC (ctxt->get_logger ());
+  RETURN_IF_FAIL (optname, ctxt, NULL, "NULL optname");
+  if (ctxt->get_logger ())
+    ctxt->get_logger ()->log ("optname: %s", optname);
+
+  ctxt->add_driver_option (optname);
+}
+
+/* Public entrypoint.  See description in libgccjit.h.
+
    After error-checking, the real work is done by the
    gcc::jit::recording::context::enable_dump method in
    jit-recording.c.  */
diff --git a/gcc/jit/libgccjit.h b/gcc/jit/libgccjit.h
index e872ae7..beeb747 100644
--- a/gcc/jit/libgccjit.h
+++ b/gcc/jit/libgccjit.h
@@ -325,6 +325,28 @@ gcc_jit_context_add_command_line_option (gcc_jit_context *ctxt,
 
 #define LIBGCCJIT_HAVE_gcc_jit_context_add_command_line_option
 
+/* Add an arbitrary gcc driver option to the context.
+   The context takes a copy of the string, so the
+   (const char *) optname is not needed anymore after the call
+   returns.
+
+   Note that only some options are likely to be meaningful; there is no
+   "frontend" within libgccjit, so typically only those affecting
+   assembler and linker are likely to be useful.
+
+   This entrypoint was added in LIBGCCJIT_ABI_11; you can test for
+   its presence using
+   #ifdef LIBGCCJIT_HAVE_gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option
+*/
+extern void
+gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option (gcc_jit_context *ctxt,
+				   const char *optname);
+
+/* Pre-canned feature-test macro for detecting the presence of
+   gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option within libgccjit.h.  */
+
+#define LIBGCCJIT_HAVE_gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option
+
 /* Compile the context to in-memory machine code.
 
    This can be called more that once on a given context,
diff --git a/gcc/jit/libgccjit.map b/gcc/jit/libgccjit.map
index 2826f1c..16f5253 100644
--- a/gcc/jit/libgccjit.map
+++ b/gcc/jit/libgccjit.map
@@ -170,3 +170,8 @@ LIBGCCJIT_ABI_10 {
   global:
     gcc_jit_context_new_rvalue_from_vector;
 } LIBGCCJIT_ABI_9;
+
+LIBGCCJIT_ABI_11 {
+  global:
+    gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option;
+} LIBGCCJIT_ABI_10;
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/add-driver-options-testlib.c b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/add-driver-options-testlib.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1757bb1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/add-driver-options-testlib.c
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+/* Used by test-add-driver-options.c */
+
+extern int callee_function (void)
+{
+  return 1978;
+}
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/all-non-failing-tests.h b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/all-non-failing-tests.h
index bf02e12..9a10418 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/all-non-failing-tests.h
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/all-non-failing-tests.h
@@ -22,6 +22,9 @@
 #undef create_code
 #undef verify_code
 
+/* test-add-driver-options.c: We don't use this one, since the extra options
+   affect the whole context.  */
+
 /* test-alignment.c */
 #define create_code create_code_alignment
 #define verify_code verify_code_alignment
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/jit.exp b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/jit.exp
index 869d9f6..13e8ab4 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/jit.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/jit.exp
@@ -379,6 +379,19 @@ proc jit-dg-test { prog do_what extra_tool_flags } {
 	append extra_tool_flags " -lpthread"
     }
 
+    # test-add-driver-options.c needs a shared library built from
+    # add-driver-options-testlib.c
+    if {[string match "*test-add-driver-options.c" $prog]} {
+	global srcdir
+	global subdir
+
+	set comp_output [gcc_target_compile \
+			     $srcdir/$subdir/add-driver-options-testlib.c \
+			     "libadd-driver-options-testlib.so" \
+			     "executable" \
+			     "additional_flags=-fPIC additional_flags=-shared"]
+    }
+
     # Any test case that uses jit-verify-output-file-was-created
     # needs to call jit-setup-compile-to-file here.
     # (is there a better way to handle setup/finish pairs in dg?)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-add-driver-options.c b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-add-driver-options.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..74ac168
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/jit.dg/test-add-driver-options.c
@@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+
+#include "libgccjit.h"
+#include "harness.h"
+
+#ifndef LIBGCCJIT_HAVE_gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option
+#error LIBGCCJIT_HAVE_gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option was not defined
+#endif
+
+void
+create_code (gcc_jit_context *ctxt, void *user_data)
+{
+
+  gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option (ctxt, "-L./");
+  gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option (ctxt, "-ladd-driver-options-testlib");
+
+  /* Let's try to inject the equivalent of:
+
+      int caller_function (void)
+      {
+        return callee_function ();
+      }
+  */
+  gcc_jit_type *int_type =
+    gcc_jit_context_get_type (ctxt, GCC_JIT_TYPE_INT);
+
+  gcc_jit_function *caller_func =
+    gcc_jit_context_new_function (ctxt, NULL,
+                                  GCC_JIT_FUNCTION_EXPORTED,
+                                  int_type,
+                                  "caller_function",
+                                  0, NULL,
+                                  0);
+
+  gcc_jit_block *block =
+    gcc_jit_function_new_block (caller_func, NULL);
+
+  gcc_jit_function *callee_func =
+    gcc_jit_context_new_function(ctxt, NULL,
+				 GCC_JIT_FUNCTION_IMPORTED,
+				 int_type,
+				 "callee_function",
+				 0, NULL,
+				 1);
+
+  gcc_jit_block_end_with_return (block, NULL,
+				 gcc_jit_context_new_call(ctxt,
+							  NULL,
+							  callee_func,
+							  0,
+							  0));
+}
+
+void
+verify_code (gcc_jit_context *ctxt, gcc_jit_result *result)
+{
+  typedef int (*my_caller_fn_type) (void);
+
+  CHECK_NON_NULL (result);
+  my_caller_fn_type callee_function_ptr =
+    (my_caller_fn_type)gcc_jit_result_get_code (result, "callee_function");
+  CHECK_NON_NULL (callee_function_ptr);
+
+  int res = callee_function_ptr ();
+
+  CHECK_VALUE (res, 1978);
+}

Late-breaking jit features (was Re: [PATCH][gcc] libgccjit: introduce gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option)

[David Malcolm]

On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 08:40 +0000, Andrea Corallo wrote:
> Hi all,
> Second version of the patch addressing David's comment about all-non-
> failing-tests.h
> 
> Adds gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option to the libgccjit ABI and a
> testcase for it.
> 
> Using this interface is now possible to pass options affecting
> assembler and linker.
> 
> Does not introduce regressions running make check-jit

Thanks; the patch looks good.

[CCing the release managers]

Given that gcc development is now in stage 4, we really shouldn't be
adding new features, but I'm wondering if an exception can be made for
libgccjit?  (this patch purely touches the jit subdirectories).

There's one other late-breaking change, here:
  [PATCH][jit] Add thread-local globals to the libgccjit frontend
    https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-01/msg00227.html
which is nearly ready, but is awaiting copyright assignment paperwork.

Alternatively, should these patches go into a branch of queued jit
changes for gcc 10?

Thanks
Dave


> Bests
> 
>   Andrea
> 
> 
> gcc/jit/ChangeLog
> 2019-01-16  Andrea Corallo  andrea.corallo@arm.com
> 
> * docs/topics/compatibility.rst (LIBGCCJIT_ABI_11): New ABI tag.
> * docs/topics/contexts.rst (Additional driver options): New
> section.
> * jit-playback.c (invoke_driver): Add call to append_driver_options.
> * jit-recording.c: Within namespace gcc::jit...
> (recording::context::~context): Free the optnames within
> m_driver_options.
> (recording::context::add_driver_option): New method.
> (recording::context::append_driver_options): New method.
> (recording::context::dump_reproducer_to_file): Add driver
> options.
> * jit-recording.h: Within namespace gcc::jit...
> (recording::context::add_driver_option): New method.
> (recording::context::append_driver_options): New method.
> (recording::context::m_driver_options): New field.
> * libgccjit++.h (gccjit::context::add_driver_option): New
> method.
> * libgccjit.c (gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option): New API
> entrypoint.
> * libgccjit.h (gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option): New API
> entrypoint.
> (LIBGCCJIT_HAVE_gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option): New
> macro.
> * libgccjit.map (LIBGCCJIT_ABI_11): New ABI tag.
> 
> 
> 
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> 2019-01-16  Andrea Corallo  andrea.corallo@arm.com
> 
> * jit.dg/add-driver-options-testlib.c: Add support file for
> test-add-driver-options.c testcase.
> * jit.dg/all-non-failing-tests.h: Add note about
> test-add-driver-options.c
> * jit.dg/jit.exp (jit-dg-test): Update to support
> add-driver-options-testlib.c compilation.
> * jit.dg/test-add-driver-options.c: New testcase.
> 

Re: Late-breaking jit features (was Re: [PATCH][gcc] libgccjit: introduce gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option)

[Richard Biener]

On February 1, 2019 10:11:12 PM GMT+01:00, David Malcolm <dmalcolm@redhat.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 08:40 +0000, Andrea Corallo wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Second version of the patch addressing David's comment about all-non-
>> failing-tests.h
>> 
>> Adds gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option to the libgccjit ABI and a
>> testcase for it.
>> 
>> Using this interface is now possible to pass options affecting
>> assembler and linker.
>> 
>> Does not introduce regressions running make check-jit
>
>Thanks; the patch looks good.
>
>[CCing the release managers]
>
>Given that gcc development is now in stage 4, we really shouldn't be
>adding new features, but I'm wondering if an exception can be made for
>libgccjit?  (this patch purely touches the jit subdirectories).
>
>There's one other late-breaking change, here:
>  [PATCH][jit] Add thread-local globals to the libgccjit frontend
>    https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-01/msg00227.html
>which is nearly ready, but is awaiting copyright assignment paperwork.
>
>Alternatively, should these patches go into a branch of queued jit
>changes for gcc 10?

Is there anything like an ABI involved? If so we should avoid breaking it all the time. Otherwise JIT is not release critical and thus if you break it in the wrong moment it's your own fault. 

Richard. 

>Thanks
>Dave
>
>
>> Bests
>> 
>>   Andrea
>> 
>> 
>> gcc/jit/ChangeLog
>> 2019-01-16  Andrea Corallo  andrea.corallo@arm.com
>> 
>> * docs/topics/compatibility.rst (LIBGCCJIT_ABI_11): New ABI tag.
>> * docs/topics/contexts.rst (Additional driver options): New
>> section.
>> * jit-playback.c (invoke_driver): Add call to append_driver_options.
>> * jit-recording.c: Within namespace gcc::jit...
>> (recording::context::~context): Free the optnames within
>> m_driver_options.
>> (recording::context::add_driver_option): New method.
>> (recording::context::append_driver_options): New method.
>> (recording::context::dump_reproducer_to_file): Add driver
>> options.
>> * jit-recording.h: Within namespace gcc::jit...
>> (recording::context::add_driver_option): New method.
>> (recording::context::append_driver_options): New method.
>> (recording::context::m_driver_options): New field.
>> * libgccjit++.h (gccjit::context::add_driver_option): New
>> method.
>> * libgccjit.c (gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option): New API
>> entrypoint.
>> * libgccjit.h (gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option): New API
>> entrypoint.
>> (LIBGCCJIT_HAVE_gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option): New
>> macro.
>> * libgccjit.map (LIBGCCJIT_ABI_11): New ABI tag.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>> 2019-01-16  Andrea Corallo  andrea.corallo@arm.com
>> 
>> * jit.dg/add-driver-options-testlib.c: Add support file for
>> test-add-driver-options.c testcase.
>> * jit.dg/all-non-failing-tests.h: Add note about
>> test-add-driver-options.c
>> * jit.dg/jit.exp (jit-dg-test): Update to support
>> add-driver-options-testlib.c compilation.
>> * jit.dg/test-add-driver-options.c: New testcase.
>> 

Re: Late-breaking jit features (was Re: [PATCH][gcc] libgccjit: introduce gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option)

[David Malcolm]

On Sat, 2019-02-02 at 08:26 +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On February 1, 2019 10:11:12 PM GMT+01:00, David Malcolm <dmalcolm@re
> dhat.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 08:40 +0000, Andrea Corallo wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > > Second version of the patch addressing David's comment about all-
> > > non-
> > > failing-tests.h
> > > 
> > > Adds gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option to the libgccjit ABI and a
> > > testcase for it.
> > > 
> > > Using this interface is now possible to pass options affecting
> > > assembler and linker.
> > > 
> > > Does not introduce regressions running make check-jit
> > 
> > Thanks; the patch looks good.
> > 
> > [CCing the release managers]
> > 
> > Given that gcc development is now in stage 4, we really shouldn't
> > be
> > adding new features, but I'm wondering if an exception can be made
> > for
> > libgccjit?  (this patch purely touches the jit subdirectories).
> > 
> > There's one other late-breaking change, here:
> >  [PATCH][jit] Add thread-local globals to the libgccjit frontend
> >    https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-01/msg00227.html
> > which is nearly ready, but is awaiting copyright assignment
> > paperwork.
> > 
> > Alternatively, should these patches go into a branch of queued jit
> > changes for gcc 10?
> 
> Is there anything like an ABI involved? If so we should avoid
> breaking it all the time. Otherwise JIT is not release critical and
> thus if you break it in the wrong moment it's your own fault. 

The two patches each add a new API entrypoint, but libgccjit uses
symbol-versioning to extend the ABI, without bumping the SONAME:
  https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/jit/topics/compatibility.html
So it's not an ABI break as such.

Dave


> Richard. 
> 
> > Thanks
> > Dave
> > 
> > 
> > > Bests
> > > 
> > >   Andrea
> > > 
> > > 
> > > gcc/jit/ChangeLog
> > > 2019-01-16  Andrea Corallo  andrea.corallo@arm.com
> > > 
> > > * docs/topics/compatibility.rst (LIBGCCJIT_ABI_11): New ABI tag.
> > > * docs/topics/contexts.rst (Additional driver options): New
> > > section.
> > > * jit-playback.c (invoke_driver): Add call to
> > > append_driver_options.
> > > * jit-recording.c: Within namespace gcc::jit...
> > > (recording::context::~context): Free the optnames within
> > > m_driver_options.
> > > (recording::context::add_driver_option): New method.
> > > (recording::context::append_driver_options): New method.
> > > (recording::context::dump_reproducer_to_file): Add driver
> > > options.
> > > * jit-recording.h: Within namespace gcc::jit...
> > > (recording::context::add_driver_option): New method.
> > > (recording::context::append_driver_options): New method.
> > > (recording::context::m_driver_options): New field.
> > > * libgccjit++.h (gccjit::context::add_driver_option): New
> > > method.
> > > * libgccjit.c (gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option): New API
> > > entrypoint.
> > > * libgccjit.h (gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option): New API
> > > entrypoint.
> > > (LIBGCCJIT_HAVE_gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option): New
> > > macro.
> > > * libgccjit.map (LIBGCCJIT_ABI_11): New ABI tag.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> > > 2019-01-16  Andrea Corallo  andrea.corallo@arm.com
> > > 
> > > * jit.dg/add-driver-options-testlib.c: Add support file for
> > > test-add-driver-options.c testcase.
> > > * jit.dg/all-non-failing-tests.h: Add note about
> > > test-add-driver-options.c
> > > * jit.dg/jit.exp (jit-dg-test): Update to support
> > > add-driver-options-testlib.c compilation.
> > > * jit.dg/test-add-driver-options.c: New testcase.
> > > 
> 
> 

Re: Late-breaking jit features (was Re: [PATCH][gcc] libgccjit: introduce gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option)

[Jakub Jelinek]

On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 10:18:43AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > Alternatively, should these patches go into a branch of queued jit
> > > changes for gcc 10?
> > 
> > Is there anything like an ABI involved? If so we should avoid
> > breaking it all the time. Otherwise JIT is not release critical and
> > thus if you break it in the wrong moment it's your own fault. 
> 
> The two patches each add a new API entrypoint, but libgccjit uses
> symbol-versioning to extend the ABI, without bumping the SONAME:
>   https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/jit/topics/compatibility.html
> So it's not an ABI break as such.

I'd say it depends on how quickly the copyright paperwork can be done, the
patch can't be added until that is resolved.  While gccjit is not release
critical, it would be nice not to break it late, so say if it can be
committed by end of February/mid March, I guess it is fine, given the
assumption we'd like to release mid April to end of April, if it can't be
done by then, might be better to postpone to GCC 10.

	Jakub

Re: Late-breaking jit features (was Re: [PATCH][gcc] libgccjit: introduce gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option)

[David Malcolm]

On Sat, 2019-02-02 at 16:34 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 10:18:43AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > > Alternatively, should these patches go into a branch of queued
> > > > jit
> > > > changes for gcc 10?
> > > 
> > > Is there anything like an ABI involved? If so we should avoid
> > > breaking it all the time. Otherwise JIT is not release critical
> > > and
> > > thus if you break it in the wrong moment it's your own fault. 
> > 
> > The two patches each add a new API entrypoint, but libgccjit uses
> > symbol-versioning to extend the ABI, without bumping the SONAME:
> >   https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/jit/topics/compatibility.html
> > So it's not an ABI break as such.
> 
> I'd say it depends on how quickly the copyright paperwork can be
> done, the
> patch can't be added until that is resolved.  While gccjit is not
> release
> critical, it would be nice not to break it late, so say if it can be
> committed by end of February/mid March, I guess it is fine, given the
> assumption we'd like to release mid April to end of April, if it
> can't be
> done by then, might be better to postpone to GCC 10.
> 
> 	Jakub

Jakub and Richard: thanks.

I've double-checked the gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option patch and it
looks good (it's a different patch that we're waiting on paperwork
for).

Andrea: are you able to commit this, or should I do this on your
behalf?

Dave

Re: Late-breaking jit features (was Re: [PATCH][gcc] libgccjit: introduce gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option)

[Andrea Corallo]

David Malcolm writes:

> On Sat, 2019-02-02 at 16:34 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 10:18:43AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
>> > > > Alternatively, should these patches go into a branch of queued
>> > > > jit
>> > > > changes for gcc 10?
>> > >
>> > > Is there anything like an ABI involved? If so we should avoid
>> > > breaking it all the time. Otherwise JIT is not release critical
>> > > and
>> > > thus if you break it in the wrong moment it's your own fault.
>> >
>> > The two patches each add a new API entrypoint, but libgccjit uses
>> > symbol-versioning to extend the ABI, without bumping the SONAME:
>> >   https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/jit/topics/compatibility.html
>> > So it's not an ABI break as such.
>>
>> I'd say it depends on how quickly the copyright paperwork can be
>> done, the
>> patch can't be added until that is resolved.  While gccjit is not
>> release
>> critical, it would be nice not to break it late, so say if it can be
>> committed by end of February/mid March, I guess it is fine, given the
>> assumption we'd like to release mid April to end of April, if it
>> can't be
>> done by then, might be better to postpone to GCC 10.
>>
>> 	Jakub
>
> Jakub and Richard: thanks.
>
> I've double-checked the gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option patch and it
> looks good (it's a different patch that we're waiting on paperwork
> for).
>
> Andrea: are you able to commit this, or should I do this on your
> behalf?
>
> Dave

Hi David,
I have no repo write access so if you could push it that would be great.

Thanks a lot

  Andrea

Re: Late-breaking jit features (was Re: [PATCH][gcc] libgccjit: introduce gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option)

[David Malcolm]

On Tue, 2019-02-05 at 21:40 +0000, Andrea Corallo wrote:
> David Malcolm writes:
> 
> > On Sat, 2019-02-02 at 16:34 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 10:18:43AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > > > > Alternatively, should these patches go into a branch of
> > > > > > queued
> > > > > > jit
> > > > > > changes for gcc 10?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Is there anything like an ABI involved? If so we should avoid
> > > > > breaking it all the time. Otherwise JIT is not release
> > > > > critical
> > > > > and
> > > > > thus if you break it in the wrong moment it's your own fault.
> > > > 
> > > > The two patches each add a new API entrypoint, but libgccjit
> > > > uses
> > > > symbol-versioning to extend the ABI, without bumping the
> > > > SONAME:
> > > >   https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/jit/topics/compatibility.html
> > > > So it's not an ABI break as such.
> > > 
> > > I'd say it depends on how quickly the copyright paperwork can be
> > > done, the
> > > patch can't be added until that is resolved.  While gccjit is not
> > > release
> > > critical, it would be nice not to break it late, so say if it can
> > > be
> > > committed by end of February/mid March, I guess it is fine, given
> > > the
> > > assumption we'd like to release mid April to end of April, if it
> > > can't be
> > > done by then, might be better to postpone to GCC 10.
> > > 
> > > 	Jakub
> > 
> > Jakub and Richard: thanks.
> > 
> > I've double-checked the gcc_jit_context_add_driver_option patch and
> > it
> > looks good (it's a different patch that we're waiting on paperwork
> > for).
> > 
> > Andrea: are you able to commit this, or should I do this on your
> > behalf?
> > 
> > Dave
> 
> Hi David,
> I have no repo write access so if you could push it that would be
> great.
> 
> Thanks a lot

I've committed it to trunk as r268563.

Dave