public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Ellcey <sellcey@caviumnetworks.com>
To: <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Speed up math/test-tgmath2.c
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 17:22:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1478280156.4630.18.camel@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1477354555.8523.78.camel@caviumnetworks.com>

Ping on this patch to speed up the compilation of math/test-tgmath2.c
when using the latest GCC.

Steve Ellcey
sellcey@caviumnetworks.com


On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 17:15 -0700, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> The test math/test-tgmath2.c takes a long time to compile with newer
> versions of GCC due to variable tracking.  There was some discussion a
> while back about using -fno-var-tracking on this test but that was not
> considered to be the correct solution, it was thought that breaking up
> the test into smaller pieces in order to speed up compilation was a
> better solution.  Here is a patch that does that.  It does not break it
> up into multiple tests but it breaks up the test function into multiple
> functions so that there isn't one single giant function that gives the
> GCC variable tracking phase a fit.
> 
> On a box where the original version takes 18 minutes to compile using a
> pre-release GCC 7.0, the modified version compiles in 3 minutes.  GCC
> 5.4 took about 2.5 minutes on the same machine.
> 
> Original discussion:
> 
> https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-10/msg00430.html
> 
> 
> Does this seem like a reasonable way to speed up this test?
> 
> 
> 2016-10-24  Steve Ellcey  <sellcey@caviumnetworks.com>
> 
>         * math/test-tgmath2.c: Split up test function.
> 
> 
> diff --git a/math/test-tgmath2.c b/math/test-tgmath2.c
> index b376fd6..4d828fe 100644
> --- a/math/test-tgmath2.c
> +++ b/math/test-tgmath2.c
> @@ -89,12 +89,6 @@ enum
>  int count;
>  int counts[Tlast][C_last];
>  
> -int
> -test (const int Vint4, const long long int Vllong4)
> -{
> -  int result = 0;
> -  int quo = 0;
> -
>  #define FAIL(str) \
>    do								
> \
>      {								
> \
> @@ -138,6 +132,11 @@ test (const int Vint4, const long long int
> Vllong4)
>    while (0)
>  #define TEST(expr, type, fn) TEST2(expr, type, type, fn)
>  
> +int
> +test_cos (const int Vint4, const long long int Vllong4)
> +{
> +  int result = 0;
> +
>    TEST (cos (vfloat1), float, cos);
>    TEST (cos (vdouble1), double, cos);
>    TEST (cos (vldouble1), ldouble, cos);
> @@ -155,6 +154,14 @@ test (const int Vint4, const long long int
> Vllong4)
>    TEST (cos (Vcdouble1), cdouble, cos);
>    TEST (cos (Vcldouble1), cldouble, cos);
>  
> +  return result;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +test_fabs (const int Vint4, const long long int Vllong4)
> +{
> +  int result = 0;
> +
>    TEST (fabs (vfloat1), float, fabs);
>    TEST (fabs (vdouble1), double, fabs);
>    TEST (fabs (vldouble1), ldouble, fabs);
> @@ -180,6 +187,13 @@ test (const int Vint4, const long long int
> Vllong4)
>    TEST (fabs (Vcdouble1), double, cabs);
>    TEST (fabs (Vcldouble1), ldouble, cabs);
>  
> +  return result;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +test_conj (const int Vint4, const long long int Vllong4)
> +{
> +  int result = 0;
>    TEST (conj (vfloat1), cfloat, conj);
>    TEST (conj (vdouble1), cdouble, conj);
>    TEST (conj (vldouble1), cldouble, conj);
> @@ -197,6 +211,14 @@ test (const int Vint4, const long long int
> Vllong4)
>    TEST (conj (Vcdouble1), cdouble, conj);
>    TEST (conj (Vcldouble1), cldouble, conj);
>  
> +  return result;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +test_expm1 (const int Vint4, const long long int Vllong4)
> +{
> +  int result = 0;
> +
>    TEST (expm1 (vfloat1), float, expm1);
>    TEST (expm1 (vdouble1), double, expm1);
>    TEST (expm1 (vldouble1), ldouble, expm1);
> @@ -208,6 +230,13 @@ test (const int Vint4, const long long int
> Vllong4)
>    TEST (expm1 (Vint1), double, expm1);
>    TEST (expm1 (Vllong1), double, expm1);
>  
> +  return result;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +test_lrint (const int Vint4, const long long int Vllong4)
> +{
> +  int result = 0;
>    TEST2 (lrint (vfloat1), float, long int, lrint);
>    TEST2 (lrint (vdouble1), double, long int, lrint);
>    TEST2 (lrint (vldouble1), ldouble, long int, lrint);
> @@ -219,6 +248,14 @@ test (const int Vint4, const long long int
> Vllong4)
>    TEST2 (lrint (Vint1), double, long int, lrint);
>    TEST2 (lrint (Vllong1), double, long int, lrint);
>  
> +  return result;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +test_ldexp (const int Vint4, const long long int Vllong4)
> +{
> +  int result = 0;
> +
>    TEST (ldexp (vfloat1, 6), float, ldexp);
>    TEST (ldexp (vdouble1, 6), double, ldexp);
>    TEST (ldexp (vldouble1, 6), ldouble, ldexp);
> @@ -230,6 +267,9 @@ test (const int Vint4, const long long int
> Vllong4)
>    TEST (ldexp (Vint1, 6), double, ldexp);
>    TEST (ldexp (Vllong1, 6), double, ldexp);
>  
> +  return result;
> +}
> +
>  #define FIRST(x, y) (y, x)
>  #define SECOND(x, y) (x, y)
>  #define NON_LDBL_TEST(fn, argm, arg, type, fnt) \
> @@ -307,25 +347,82 @@ test (const int Vint4, const long long int
> Vllong4)
>    NON_LDBL_CTEST (fn, FIRST, Vcdouble2, cdouble, fnt); \
>    NON_LDBL_CTEST (fn, SECOND, Vcdouble2, cdouble, fnt);
>  
> +int
> +test_atan2 (const int Vint4, const long long int Vllong4)
> +{
> +  int result = 0;
> +
>    BINARY_TEST (atan2, atan2);
>  
> +  return result;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +test_remquo (const int Vint4, const long long int Vllong4)
> +{
> +  int result = 0;
> +  int quo = 0;
> +
>  #define my_remquo(x, y) remquo (x, y, &quo)
>    BINARY_TEST (my_remquo, remquo);
>  #undef my_remquo
>  
> +  return result;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +test_pow (const int Vint4, const long long int Vllong4)
> +{
> +  int result = 0;
> +
>    BINARY_CTEST (pow, pow);
>  
> -  /* Testing all arguments of fma would be just too expensive,
> -     so test just some.  */
> +  return result;
> +}
> +
> +/* Testing all arguments of fma would be just too expensive,
> +   so test just some.  */
> +
> +int
> +test_fma_1 (const int Vint4, const long long int Vllong4)
> +{
> +  int result = 0;
> +
>  #define my_fma(x, y) fma (x, y, vfloat3)
>    BINARY_TEST (my_fma, fma);
>  #undef my_fma
> +
> +  return result;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +test_fma_2 (const int Vint4, const long long int Vllong4)
> +{
> +  int result = 0;
> +
>  #define my_fma(x, y) fma (x, vfloat3, y)
>    BINARY_TEST (my_fma, fma);
>  #undef my_fma
> +
> +  return result;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +test_fma_3 (const int Vint4, const long long int Vllong4)
> +{
> +  int result = 0;
> +
>  #define my_fma(x, y) fma (Vfloat3, x, y)
>    BINARY_TEST (my_fma, fma);
>  #undef my_fma
> +
> +  return result;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +test_fma_4 (const int Vint4, const long long int Vllong4)
> +{
> +  int result = 0;
>    TEST (fma (vdouble1, Vdouble2, vllong3), double, fma);
>    TEST (fma (vint1, Vint2, vint3), double, fma);
>    TEST (fma (Vldouble1, vldouble2, Vldouble3), ldouble, fma);
> @@ -337,7 +434,19 @@ test (const int Vint4, const long long int
> Vllong4)
>  static int
>  do_test (void)
>  {
> -  return test (vint1, vllong1);
> +  return test_cos (vint1, vllong1)
> +	 + test_fabs (vint1, vllong1)
> +	 + test_conj (vint1, vllong1)
> +	 + test_expm1 (vint1, vllong1)
> +	 + test_lrint (vint1, vllong1)
> +	 + test_ldexp (vint1, vllong1)
> +	 + test_atan2 (vint1, vllong1)
> +	 + test_remquo (vint1, vllong1)
> +	 + test_pow (vint1, vllong1)
> +	 + test_fma_1 (vint1, vllong1)
> +	 + test_fma_2 (vint1, vllong1)
> +	 + test_fma_3 (vint1, vllong1)
> +	 + test_fma_4 (vint1, vllong1);
>  }
>  
>  /* Now generate the three functions.  */

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-04 17:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-25  0:16 Steve Ellcey
2016-11-04 17:22 ` Steve Ellcey [this message]
2016-11-04 17:26   ` Joseph Myers
2016-11-04 18:06     ` Steve Ellcey
2016-11-04 21:22       ` Joseph Myers
2016-11-04 21:06     ` Steve Ellcey
2016-11-04 21:27       ` Joseph Myers
2016-11-04 22:02         ` Steve Ellcey
2016-11-04 22:06           ` Joseph Myers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1478280156.4630.18.camel@caviumnetworks.com \
    --to=sellcey@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).