From: Steve Ellcey <sellcey@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
Cc: <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Speed up math/test-tgmath2.c
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2016 18:06:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1478282790.4630.26.camel@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611041724170.25235@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>
On Fri, 2016-11-04 at 17:25 +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Nov 2016, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>
> >
> > >
> > > +Â Â return test_cos (vint1, vllong1)
> > > + Â + test_fabs (vint1, vllong1)
> > > + Â + test_conj (vint1, vllong1)
> > > + Â + test_expm1 (vint1, vllong1)
> > > + Â + test_lrint (vint1, vllong1)
> > > + Â + test_ldexp (vint1, vllong1)
> > > + Â + test_atan2 (vint1, vllong1)
> > > + Â + test_remquo (vint1, vllong1)
> > > + Â + test_pow (vint1, vllong1)
> > > + Â + test_fma_1 (vint1, vllong1)
> > > + Â + test_fma_2 (vint1, vllong1)
> > > + Â + test_fma_3 (vint1, vllong1)
> > > + Â + test_fma_4 (vint1, vllong1);
> You don't want to add up test results like that; you should OR themÂ
> together instead, to avoid the potential for test results adding up
> to 77 and wrongly becoming UNSUPPORTED.  (In this case of course
> there aren't enough tests to get to 77, but the principle applies
> that you should avoid the test return being a count of something.)
I'll fix that and resubmit. Â Is there documentation on what do_test
should return? Â I looked at test-skeleton.c but there was nothing in
there about what do_test/TEST_FUNCTION should return for different
results (PASS/FAIL/UNSUPPORTED). Â I didn't see anything in the Wiki
about return values from do_test either.
Steve Ellcey
sellcey@caviumnetworks.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-04 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-25 0:16 Steve Ellcey
2016-11-04 17:22 ` Steve Ellcey
2016-11-04 17:26 ` Joseph Myers
2016-11-04 18:06 ` Steve Ellcey [this message]
2016-11-04 21:22 ` Joseph Myers
2016-11-04 21:06 ` Steve Ellcey
2016-11-04 21:27 ` Joseph Myers
2016-11-04 22:02 ` Steve Ellcey
2016-11-04 22:06 ` Joseph Myers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1478282790.4630.26.camel@caviumnetworks.com \
--to=sellcey@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).