public inbox for libc-alpha@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
To: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Biener via Gcc <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>,
	GNU C Library <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
	Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>,
	libc-coord@lists.openwall.com
Subject: Re: [libc-coord] Add new ABI '__memcmpeq()' to libc
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 11:12:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210917091219.GL304296@tucnak> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y27vhbel.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 10:08:34AM +0200, Florian Weimer via Gcc wrote:
> > So the compiler would emit a call to __memcmpeq and at the same time
> > emit a weak alias of __memcmpeq to memcmp so the program links
> > when the libc version targeted does not provide __memcmpeq?  Or would
> > glibc through <string.h> magically communicate the availability of the new ABI
> > without actually declaring the function?
> 
> I do not think ELF provides that capability.
> 
> We can add a declaration to <string.h> to communicate the availability.
> I think this is how glibc (and other libcs) communicate the availability
> of non-standard interfaces to GCC.

Yeah, that is what we've done in the past, e.g. in case of stpcpy.

	Jakub


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-17  9:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-16 17:02 Noah Goldstein
2021-09-16 17:55 ` [libc-coord] " Chris Kennelly
2021-09-16 18:31   ` Noah Goldstein
2021-09-16 20:32     ` Chris Kennelly
2021-09-16 20:35       ` Joseph Myers
2021-09-16 20:55         ` enh
2021-09-17  7:43         ` Richard Biener
2021-09-17  8:08           ` Florian Weimer
2021-09-17  8:31             ` Richard Biener
2021-09-17  8:37               ` Florian Weimer
2021-09-17  9:30                 ` Richard Biener
2021-09-17 17:40               ` Noah Goldstein
2021-09-17  9:12             ` Jakub Jelinek [this message]
2021-09-17 16:55               ` Martin Sebor
2021-09-17 14:19           ` Joseph Myers
2021-09-17 14:26             ` Florian Weimer
2021-09-21 19:53               ` Noah Goldstein
2021-09-22 17:46                 ` Christoph Müllner
2021-09-22 18:15                   ` Noah Goldstein
2021-09-16 21:27 ` James Y Knight
2021-09-16 21:42   ` Joseph Myers
2021-09-16 21:50     ` enh
2021-09-16 21:59       ` Noah Goldstein
2021-09-16 22:17       ` Chris Kennelly
2021-09-16 22:36         ` Joseph Myers
2021-09-16 23:24         ` Noah Goldstein
2021-09-18  1:36       ` James Y Knight
2021-10-26 22:47 ` Noah Goldstein

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210917091219.GL304296@tucnak \
    --to=jakub@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweimer@redhat.com \
    --cc=gcc@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
    --cc=libc-coord@lists.openwall.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).