Re: [PATCH] Add example to rand.3

["G. Branden Robinson" <g.branden.robinson@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 942 bytes --]

At 2022-12-28T00:33:13+0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote:
> The only problem with arc4random() is the lack of repeatability.  When
> testing a program with random data, you'll need repeatable results.
> For that, rand(3) Just Works.  When you want unpredictable results,
> you just seed it with some really random value, and you're fine.  You
> need to be careful to not introduce bias, but there's nothing better
> in libc.  It would be nice if libc provided a rand_uniform(3) variant
> of rand(3), BTW.

Permit me to counsel against that last proposed name.  In probability
theory "uniform" is already widely and well understood to indicate the
nature of the distribution.  A "uniform" distribution is one in which
each outcome is precisely equally likely.

rand_deterministic() would get the right idea across but is lengthy.

Regards,
Branden

P.S. I asked Bertrand to tag groff 1.23.0.rc2 earlier today.  Happy
     belated Boxing Day.  ;-)

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]